I was just about to ask this because I don't really watch college ball.
Fleming: 6'8.25 with 7'5.25 wingspan and 9'1 standing reach.
Coward: 6'5.25 with 7'2.25 wingspan and 8'10 standing reach.
Fleming is a year younger.
Fleming shot 39% from 3pt on 4.5 attempts this year. Idk if it's a fluke or legit improvement because he shot 32% on 3 attempts a year before.
Coward was at 40% on 5 attempts and was always a legit shooter.
Apparently Fleming has no handles whatsoever and would be an exclusively spot up shooter or cutter on offense. But with his size, do we even need more considering our roster?
As I said, I got no clue, maybe Coward and Bryant have higher all-round potential, but I'd honestly be happy with any 3-D wing that turns out to be a servicable player.
If we're talking player comps, I'd say that it would be great if we could get a Jaden McDaniels level player with #14.

Reply With Quote
