
objectively better… no

describing keldon as somebody who will have appeal at the deadline as a “functioning expiring contract” even though he is objectively not expiring and owed 17.5 mil fully guaranteed in 26-27 (same as his salary this season, not declining, for what it’s worth)
the plan would be to not be saddled with and committed to an overpaid player who is already on his way out of the rotation. Even as an expiring a year from now, unless Keldon has some incredible year in his projected decreased role, he’s going to cost some capital to offload
If you just want to say a keldon for Collins dead is bad because you think keldon is better, just say that. But not objective, and keldon is not a functioning expiring contract
