That's ed. It defeats the purpose of having a majority in the first place.
Your side didn't negotiate with our minority in 2010 or 2013, so why should we have to deal with your lousy minority now?
End the filibuster. It has literally no purpose. Neither party is ever getting to 60 senators again, well the GOP theoretically could by 2030 but it's a very narrow path that would require them to win almost all of the swing state senate elections, largely against (D) in bents. With the 2024 elections ushering-out the last of the legacy red-state (D) Senators [Brown, Tester, Manchin], the (D)s are realistically capped at a highest potential of 52 senate seats [the GOP is theoretically capped at 62 + the seat in Maine] (24 states went to Trump by >10% and the country is far too polarized beyond repair to ever elect say, another Democrat for U.S. Senate in a state like North Dakota or Montana, or another Republican for U.S. Senate in a state like Vermont or Massachusetts) so their path to any majority is very narrow and relies on running the table in all of the Biden states + picking off a senate seat or two in NC which is tough but not out of reach I guess...?!?? It's not 2006 anymore... for U.S. Senate, and any federalized election in general, polarization is king.
The point is, the majority makes the laws, not the minority. Elections have consequences. If you want your way, flip the majority, plain and simple. 51/100 votes is a majority and should be enough to pass whatever. And unlike with the U.S. House which has gotten out of control with bat crazy like Prop 50 where you can draw spaghetti districts across a population-rich state to rig the majority (like Pritzker's bat map in Illinois and what Spanberger has been hawking lately in Virginia), in the Senate it's very simple: win the majority of states. And the Dems have been increasingly lousy at appealing to non-urban voters in the past few decades, so it's their fault that they can't come close to sniffing Senate seats or ECV votes in most rural states these days.

Reply With Quote
