Page 66 of 133 FirstFirst ... 165662636465666768697076116 ... LastLast
Results 1,626 to 1,650 of 3318
  1. #1626
    I love J.T. smeagol's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Post Count
    11,756
    Why did Bush just sit there reading a children's book after he heard of the attack?
    Because he was clearly part of the conspiracy . . .

  2. #1627
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Why did Bush just sit there reading a children's book after he heard of the attack?
    Well, some of those words were kinda hard. It took a while.

  3. #1628
    Believe. GoGatos.'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    199
    ^


    I guess Chump and RandomGuy are to busy looking for Google answers.

  4. #1629
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Why did Bush just sit there reading a children's book after he heard of the attack?
    Bush just sat there after being informed of the first plane. On that morning the first bit of news we heard was one plane hitting one building, everybody including myself, thought it was a terrible accident.

    After being told of the second plane, everybody knew, including the president that it wasn't an accident, but rather it was an attack.


    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in521718.shtml
    “I thought it was an accident,” says Mr. Bush. “I thought it was a pilot error. I thought that some foolish soul had gotten lost - and made a terrible mistake.”

    Mr. Bush was told about the first plane just before sitting down with a class of second graders. He was watching a reading drill when, just after 9 a.m., United Flight 175 exploded into the second tower.

    There was the sudden realization that what had seemed like a terrible mistake was a coordinated attack on the nation - live on TV.

    Back in the Florida classroom, press secretary Ari Fleischer got the news on his pager. The president’s chief-of-staff, Andy Card, stepped in.

    “A second plane hit the second tower; America is under attack,” Card told the president. What was Mr. Bush's reaction?

    “I saw him coming to recognition of what I had said,” recalls Card. “I think he understood that he was going to have to take command as commander-in-chief, not just as president.”What was going through Bush’s mind when he heard the news?

    “We’re at war and somebody has dared attack us and we’re going to do something about it,” recalls Mr. Bush. “I realized I was in a unique setting to receive a message that somebody attacked us, and I was looking at these little children and all of the sudden we were at war. I can remember noticing the press pool and the press corps beginning to get the calls and seeing the look on their face. And it became evident that we were, you know, that the world had changed.”

    Mr. Bush walked into a classroom set up with a secure phone. He called the vice president, pulling the phone cord tight as he spun to see the attack on TV. Then he grabbed a legal pad and quickly wrote his first words to the nation.

    "Ladies and gentlemen, this is a difficult moment for America,” he said in the speech. “Today, we’ve had a national tragedy. Two airplanes have crashed into the World Trade Center in an apparent terrorist attack on our country.”

    It was 9:30 a.m. As he spoke, Mr. Bush didn’t know that two more hijacked jets were streaking toward Washington. Vice President Cheney was in his office at the White House when a Secret Service agent ran in.

    “He said to me, ‘Sir, we have to leave immediately’ and grabbed, put a hand on my belt, another hand on my shoulder and propelled me out the door of my office,” recalls Cheney. “I’m not sure how they do it, but they sort of levitate you down the hallway. You move very fast.”

  5. #1630
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    ^


    I guess Chump and RandomGuy are to busy looking for Google answers.
    Pfft. Please don't confuse me actually spending some quality time with my family for me tirelessly trying to search for the answer to a conspiraquestion.

    I spent all of 4 minutes on my answer, although I did read the whole article after I posted the excerpt. It was interesting.

  6. #1631
    A VERY BAD man
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    2,126
    Let the flaming begin.

    Either the conspiracy theorists are right about a massive organized evil conspiracy, or they are wrong.
    If it runs that deep it's pointless to discuss. May as well talk about UFO's.

  7. #1632
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I ask yet again, for the 23rdnd time a simple yes or no question.

    ARE THERE ANY EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS OF VISIBLE EXPLOSIVE DEVICES IN THE TWIN TOWERS?

    We all know the answer, but only one side lacks the honesty to answer the question.

    I have answered a simple, honest question, and now would like a simple honest answer.

  8. #1633
    THANK YOU BASED NEAL ClingingMars's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    4,729
    the very fact that people who believe this are alive is proof that it isn't true. why hasn't the gov't killed you yet, since you discovered their secret plot?

    - Mars

  9. #1634
    All worked up Agitator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    160
    I ask yet again, for the 23rdnd time a simple yes or no question.

    ARE THERE ANY EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS OF VISIBLE EXPLOSIVE DEVICES IN THE TWIN TOWERS?

    We all know the answer, but only one side lacks the honesty to answer the question.

    I have answered a simple, honest question, and now would like a simple honest answer.
    Could you possibly make that text bigger, Mr. Math-equation?

    I skimmed this thread and am amazed that it is one of the longest ones in this forum.

  10. #1635
    Keith Jackson mookie2001's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    13,278
    if theyre an eyewitness wouldnt they have to be visible?

  11. #1636
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    Another Air Traffic Controller Supports 9/11 Truth

    Andrew Kornkven, an Air Traffic Controller from Minnesota for over 15 years, will come out of the woodwork tonight, and announce his support for 9/11 Truth on Dr. Kevin Barrett's radio show. Although Kornkven has written before on 9/11, he has never revealed to the public that he is an ATC.

    Andy was my roommate in college during the 1980s at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and I was the best man at his wedding in 1999.

    Dr. Barrett's radio show is tonight from 8 P.M. to 10 P.M. central time, April 22.

    Listen live here, or look for archives:

    http://www.wtprn.com/

    Kornkven has already written several excellent essays regarding 9/11:

    andrewkornkven's blog
    http://www.911blogger.com/blog/253

    "Mayday! Mayday!"-- What Really Happened in the pit of United 93?
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/13376

    David Ray Griffin Burrows Further Down the Rabbit Hole of No-Phone-Calls-From-the-Planes
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/11860

    Are the Hijackers-- the Real Ones-- Still Alive and With Us Today?
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/8961

    Sex, Lies, and Phone Calls: The Ted and Barbara Story
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/5679

    Phone Calls From the Planes: Surprising New Evidence
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/5583

    Poll: Do you think the thirty or so calls made from the planes on 9/11 are real or faked?
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/5431

    Phone Calls Analysis
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/4190

    The Elephant in the Room
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/3355

    My book review for "Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11"-- rejected by Amazon.com!
    http://www.911blogger.com/node/2479

    Its interesting to note, that on September 11, 2001, Kornkven was not scheduled to work that day.

  12. #1637
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Another Air Traffic Controller Supports 9/11 Truth
    Did this guy see some visible explosive devices in the world trade center towers?

  13. #1638
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Which is precisely about how long it took for the buildings to collapse.

    Maybe that air traffic controller can tell us how fast the buildings fell down

  14. #1639
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Let’s do a quickie, common sense thought experiment to help understand what the “controlled demolition” theory is trying to say.

    The controlled demolition theory rests on the following assumption: “the building was too strong to have collapsed from simple gravity”

    Put another way “the building could easily absorb the energy of the falling section and not fully collapse”

    Does this pass the common sense muster?

    Let’s take an average guy off the street. He can hold a 100 pound bag over his head for a few minutes. Say he is balancing it on his head to make things simple. In terms of physics this means he is providing a force equal to gravity in order to hold this bag motionless.

    This is what the lower 80 stories did for the upper 30 stories for 30 years before 9-11.

    Now, one story is about 12.32 feet. The thirty floors started falling through the damaged sections, and at least one damaged, weakened floor gave way.

    Take that bag away from our average guy and hold it 12.32 feet over his head. Now drop it on his head. What happens?

    Ouch is right.

    Let’s see how many pounds of force will be applied by that bag to the guy’s head.

    KE is measured in joules. KE= ½* mass * velocity *velocity
    First let’s convert to metric for ease of calculation.
    Mass=45.36 kg http://manuelsweb.com/kg_lbs.htm
    H = 12.32 feet = 3.65 meters http://www.saudia-online.com/conversion%20Table.htm
    Ending velocity of bag= 8.45 meters/s http://tutor4physics.com/calculators.htm

    KE= ½(45.36)(8.45)(8.45) = 1619 joules
    Convert 1619 Joules back to food/pounds force a.k.a. weight = 598 http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/ccenrgy.htm

    For the controlled demolition theory to be correct the guy’s head must be able to apply almost 598 foot/pounds of force to stop the bag after such a fall.

    Is this reasonable? I think we can safely, and without the possibility of jail time for seriously injuring some poor test subject, conclude that it is not.

    Maybe “Galileo” would like to put this theory’s primary assumption to the test with a 100 bag of bull ?

    The original Galileo was actually instrumental in noting that the rate of falling objects is not dependant on mass http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Smass.htm . Perhaps our modern, more re ed, version of the real scientist can contribute something to science and prove that his head can hold, even for a split second, an eleven hundred pound object.

    Dan, or anyone else, please feel free to recheck my calculations here. I might have deliberately made a mistake just to see if you are really following along…
    Maybe that air traffic controller did some math...

  15. #1640
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121


    Meet the creators of "Loose Change".
    \

    Maybe that air traffic controller met these guys

  16. #1641
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121


    Meet Alex "Armageddon is coming in april of 2008" Jones
    Maybe that air traffic controller met Alex Jones...

  17. #1642
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121


    WTC fires were fully sufficient to cause the collapse.
    Maybe he could explain how hot the fires really were...

  18. #1643
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Maybe that controller speaks english better than "Galileo"

    I'd like to see anyone that owns a building anywhere in the world turn off the fire alarms, then watch the building fall down a few hours later, then go on national TV and say "Pull it", and not be investigated for arson.

    PULL IT!!

    WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=0
    Except that he said "THEY" made the decision. Not "I made the decision" to pull it.

    Let's look at everything the man said.

    Debunking website[/URL] ]"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

    The conspiracy theorists (hereafter referred to as “CTs”) believe that Silverstein was ordering the FDNY to demolish, or to allow to be demolished, building 7.

    In my experience, the CTs are in such a hurry to get to the “pull it” phrase that they neglect to read the statement carefully. While I will provide much evidence in this paper that’s intended to convince the most hardcore CT, all that’s really necessary is to apply a bit of logic to the Silverstein statement, so I’ll start by doing that.

    “...and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.'”
    Let’s use some logic. Was Silverstein saying,

    “We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to blow up my building,”

    or was he saying,

    “We’ve had such terrible loss of life that it would be wise to withdraw firefighters to prevent further loss of life”?

    Be honest, CTs. Which statement makes sense, and which is completely absurd?

  19. #1644
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    One of the co-conspirators who was obviously ordered to lie to the media the afternoon of 9/11:

    Maybe that air traffic controller met these co-conspirators and got them to confess...

  20. #1645
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Jason Bermas of Loose Change Disparages the FDNY at Ground Zero

    Contents
    Main 9/11 Links Page


    I have never encountered anyone in any sphere of endeavor as thoroughly misinformed as Jason Bermas, another “9/11 Truth Movement” leader, the most defiantly outspoken of Loose Change’s three creators, and its chief “researcher.” On the subject of 9/11, he seems to be completely incapable of getting anything right. Bermas has apparently spent a lot of time watching Alex Jones videos.

    In my compilation Loose Change Creators Speak, Bermas mentions 18 conspiracy theories in a single interview, not because he’s reciting a list of them, but because that’s the way he talks. The following is a bit of an “aside,” but I think it’s important to show just how twisted the thinking of the leaders of the “9/11 Truth Movement” can be. Here is a sample of Bermas’ lunacy (pun intended):

    “I contend that we may have been to the Moon, not with rocket technology, but with something else and it's secret. Definitely not the Apollo landings – they're a joke.”

    “I really do feel like the evidence is there that these guys [U.S. political and religious leaders] are in the occult.”

    On politician John Kerry: “This guy practices the occult. He had to in order to get into Skull & Bones [the not-so-secret Yale University club whose membership rolls were published by the school when Kerry was a member]. What ELSE is he capable of?”

    Radio host: “And the 9/11 attack itself, is that the European group, or is that more the Americans, like Bush and Cheney?”

    Bermas: “These guys in America are able to become billionaires, but they're not the multi-trillionaires that are in countries, basically with a free license to print money. So their power [the Americans' power] can only go so far.”

    Host: “So you see it [The people behind the 9/11 attacks] as more of a European-type thing?”

    Bermas: “Absolutely. I mean when you look at how bizarre some of these rituals are, and where these things come from...Helmut Schmidt, for instance, former German Chancellor, talks about all the things he used to do, all these Germanic death cults, and he talks about, you know, Bohemian Grove being a sex event and loving the rituals there, it's su ious to me, man! I mean, I can see that with my own eyes. [I would like to read his eyewitness accounts! –MR] ...You look at things like the Montauk Project, and Boys' Town, and they definitely used, you know, drug addicts, sexual deviants. It's mind control! It's absolute mind control.”

    “There was a report out in the past couple of days [on Alex Jones’ website, of course] that the government has been actually recruiting pastors and ministers to go around and say, you know, if something like the bird flu hits, it'll be good to go with, like, FEMA into camps and all these other federally-regulated areas, and they're actually being paid to say this stuff. And taking inoculations, and that is SCARY!”

    “Unfortunately, in this country if there is another major event, and if it is incrementalized and larger than the last one, they could declare martial law at any moment, and have forced inocu-lations, and who's to say what they put in your body?”

    “Believe it or not, TIVO was working on a brain chip, so that with your TIVO box there it would record what you want, when you want it, and it will base it on your brain patterns.”




    Prophetic logo according to Jason Bermas?


    If Bermas and other 9/11 “Truth” leaders are so obviously divorced from reality, why am I spending my time doing this? Why not leave them alone to bark at the moon and be laughed at by sensible people?

    Answer: because they have been effective at spreading their message. Millions and millions of people have viewed at least part of Loose Change, which is freely available on the internet. I get several emails a week thanking me for my Loose Change Viewer Guide (a major revision – with twice the information and better sourcing – is in the works), because for a time they had bought Loose Change’s propaganda. In August, that guide, which I don’t advertise, had a peak viewer ship of over 30,000 people in one day. That means many, many more people are out there with this stuff rattling around in their heads. Now I understand the meaning of “viral video.”

    Even people who aren’t taken in by the more extreme claims of the 9/11 Denier Movement can find themselves thinking that there must be some evidence of US government involvement in the attacks, based on the sheer volume of conspiracist claims. I have yet to see any such evidence, and it’s not for lack of trying.


    Back to Jason Bermas at Ground Zero.


    As mentioned above, the purpose of the protest at Ground Zero on 9/11/06 was to get the attention of the mainstream media. Two days earlier, on 9/09/06, the Loose Change guys and Alex Jones visited Ground Zero. Their cameramen filmed the visit. You can watch it here. It begins with a preamble by Jason Bermas:

    "You can just imagine just the flurry of people who are going to be here in memoriam of all those that died on September 11th. Really, we’re gearing up, we’re giving out 10,000 DVDs, we’ve got 1,100 shirts. We’re really gonna make our presence known. Finally the mainstream media is going to have to stop attacking us and start reporting on us fairly, and that’s really our goal."

    Bermas then strolls past, and comments on, the large bronze relief of 9/11 firefighting operations, which is on the side of Firehouse 10, across Liberty Street from the World Trade Center.


    Jason Bermas outside Firehouse 10. He forgot.




    At 40:33 in the same video, speaking at Ground Zero on the same day, Bermas expresses his opinion of the low character of FDNY firefighters, in answer to a question by Abby Scott:


    “The firefighters ARE paid off.”


    Remember, this video is promoted by the creators of Loose Change. They’re proud of it


    Months later, after I brought attention to his statement, Jason Bermas posted the following bizarre explanation on the Loose Change Blog:

    I would just like to apologize for the comment I made to one Abby Scott on September 9th of this past year. I made the MISTAKE of saying that the firefighters were paid off, I did not mean this, and am convinced some sort of Jedi Mind trick was pulled on me.

    I was discussing how if you have a government job and want to keep it, aka Controlled Demolition Inc. you keep your mouth shut. It then moved to the firefighters and some how I said "The firefighters are paid off", and then cited how many of them discussed the bombs in the days after. I DO NOT BELIEVE THE FIREFIGHTERS WERE PAID OFF! I hold them as heroes in the highest regard, and I truly believe that they were threatened in the aftermath of the event that not only traumatized a country, but still affect their lives deeply to this very day. Many of these men have families, and would do anything to keep them safe. I also believe many of them do not, and can not think the worst of their country. I know it was very difficult for me.


    So, Mr. Bermas believes, not that the firefighters were paid to keep quiet about what they know, but that they are being threatened to keep quiet. He does not present any evidence to back this absurd claim. He also seems to be implying that the respected firm Controlled Demolitions Inc. was somehow involved in this conspiracy.

    Did the 9/11/06 Ground Zero protest achieve its goal of garnering massive media attention? Dylan Avery, writer and director of Loose Change:

    "And shame on the mainstream media in general for participating in what can only be de-scribed as a media blackout. Those that did mention it marginalized it dramatically.

    We are not conspiracy theorists by any stretch.

    We are a growing body of concerned Americans who have both investigated the events and experienced them first-hand, and we are absolutely convinced that our government is hid-ing the truth from us, whatever the truth may be."

    Dylan Avery, posting on the Loose Change blog, October 3, 2006: “I find it extremely telling that this article from Mexico gives us more coverage [of 9/11] than anything we experienced from American Mainstream Media combined.”

    I believe Mr. Avery is complaining about the lack of positive mainstream media coverage, not about the lack of coverage such as that hilariously dished out by Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone on Sept. 26, 2006:

    "I challenge a 9/11 Truth leader like Loose Change writer Dylan Avery to come up with a detailed, complete summary of the alleged plot – not the bits and pieces, but the whole story, put together – that would not make any fifth grader anywhere burst out in convulsive laughter."

    You can watch a two-part debate between Bermas and Avery of Loose Change, versus myself and Ronald Wieck, on the TV show Hardfire. Part 1 Part 2.



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Next: Alex Jones Vilifies the FDNY and Larry Silverstein at Ground Zero
    Maybe he thinks the firefighters were paid off...

  21. #1646
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Before we continue examining conspiracist misrepresentations about WTC 7, it's important that we understand what the official version of events is. Here's a summary, from the NIST report.

    Essential Reading: NIST NCSTAR 1-8 Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: The Emergency Response Operations. (PDF)

    Excerpt: Summary of World Trade Center Building 7 Emergency Response.

    • The building had sustained damage from debris falling into the building, and they were not sure about the structural stability of the building.

    • The building had large fires burning on at least six floors [fires were visible on at least 16 floors]. Any one of these six fires would have been considered a large incident during normal FDNY operations.

    • There was no water immediately available for fighting the fires.

    • They didn’t have equipment, hose, standpipe kits, tools, and enough handie talkies for conducting operations inside the building.

    At approximately, 2:30 p.m., FDNY officers decided to completely abandon WTC 7, and the final order was given to evacuate the site around the building. The order terminated the ongoing rescue operations at WTC 6 and on the rubble pile of WTC 1. Firefighters and other emergency responders were withdrawn from the WTC 7 area, and the building continued to burn. At approximately 5:20 p.m., some three hours after WTC 7 was abandoned the building experienced a catastrophic failure and collapsed.

    Here’s a much-reprinted quote from FDNY Chief of Operations Daniel Nigro:

    "The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC 7] building. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building’s integrity was in serious doubt."[Fire Engineering magazine, 10/2002]

    In another interview, Chief Nigro said,

    "The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was [that] the collapse [Of the WTC towers] had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, 7 World Trade Center collapsed completely."http://tinyurl.com/g8c6y


    In 2007, "Ref" of the JREF forum and 9/11 Guide contacted Chief Nigro for clarification of some points. Here's the reply he received:

    Regarding WTC 7: The long-awaited US Government NIST (National Ins ute of Standards and Technology) report on the collapse of WTC 7 is due to be published at the end of this year (although it has been delayed already a few times [ adding fuel to the conspiracy theorists fires!]). That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail. Early on the afternoon of September 11th 2001, following the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, I feared a collapse of WTC 7 (as did many on my staff). The reasons are as follows:

    1 - Although prior to that day high-rise structures had never collapsed, The collapse of WTC 1 & 2 showed that certain high-rise structures subjected to damage from impact and from fire will collapse.

    2. The collapse of WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7.

    3. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels.

    4. numerous fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack them.

    For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.

    Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.

    Regards, Dan Nigro
    Chief of Department FDNY (retired) Source

    That’s certainly straightforward. Building 7 was severely damaged and had severe, uncontrollable fires, and the FDNY withdrew its firefighters to protect their safety.
    Maybe that air traffic controller, you know, talked to someone involved in the actual WTC decision making process...

  22. #1647
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    The Air Traffic controller will not be discussing the WTC, sorry. He will be sharing his expert knowledge of commercial aircraft and the FAA.

  23. #1648
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    If we allowed waterboarding, I bet we could get Cheney to admit he was complicit in 9/11.

  24. #1649
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    The Air Traffic controller will not be discussing the WTC, sorry. He will be sharing his expert knowledge of commercial aircraft and the FAA.
    Maybe if I asked HIM a simple question a couple of dozen times, he could answer it.

  25. #1650
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    133
    are There Any Eyewitness Accounts That Dinosaurs Existed?



    are There Any Eyewitness Accounts That Oj Killed His Wife?






    are There Any Eyewitness Accounts That Randomguy Has A Life?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •