Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 134
  1. #101
    Maaaaaannnn fuck.... E20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    15,142
    When did Pop do that?
    2003.

    Most people before the season started predicted the Spurs do finish like 8th or 7th. They didn't consider David Robinson to be great or an impact player he was old and injured. He only averged 20 MPG that season and the rest of the Spurs team were old players or young rookies.

  2. #102
    Hunker down you hairy Dawgs! romad_20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    1,062
    He retired for one (1) year. But you're right, Andrew Bynum was immediately a Top 5 bigman out of high school. He didn't need any coaching or development to become good. And Derek Fisher is a first-ballot Hall-of-Famer. Who wouldn't win with him?


    To give credit where credit is due, Kareem is the one who's been coaching Bynum. It's well do ented.

    No one address my comments of Pop being better out of a timeout, better defensive coach and preparing his players 1-12 better. Jackson is also a prick to his own players, personality and motivation has to come into play as well.

    I also made a point earlier in the thread that Pop has had Duncan, but has not had a second player the caliber of Pippen, Kobe and Shaq.

  3. #103
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    2003.

    Most people before the season started predicted the Spurs do finish like 8th or 7th. They didn't consider David Robinson to be great or an impact player he was old and injured. He only averged 20 MPG that season and the rest of the Spurs team were old players or young rookies.
    You don't consider Manu Ginobili or Tony Parker to be great players?

  4. #104
    Maaaaaannnn fuck.... E20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    15,142
    You don't consider Manu Ginobili or Tony Parker to be great players?
    In 2003? No.
    In 2003, Parker and Manu weren't even close to as good as they are now. Manu was a rookie who had only one decent playoff series ... against the Lakers. Parker was a 20-year-old point guard who was inconsistent, as is to be expected for a guy who should have been a sop re in college. You could make a case for Parker being the second best player on that team (although that's likely not the case), however Ginobili was probably the sixth or seventh best player on that team. Totally different than '05 and '07.

    These aren't even my words, I stole this from timvp in this thread: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...t=98855&page=5

    But I would have said something along those lines.

  5. #105
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    however Ginobili was probably the sixth or seventh best player on that team.
    David Robinson would have spittle all over his monitor if he read that.

  6. #106
    Saytowns Fawtbox King lebomb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    10,747
    No kidding.....Pop does not get the respect he deserves as a coach because he makes subtle adjustments to his squad and keeps on winning championships. We really only kept the big 3......that were drafted and developed through the Spurs system. Also, look at what Pop did with Bruce Bowen??!!! PJ would have never developed or even used a player like him.

    Im sorry, I just dont think PJ has had to do what Pop has. There is noway PJ could have had the same success with the Spurs as Pop has. I think he would have bailed out after a year or so.

  7. #107
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    I'm a bitter hater. Phil Jackson could lead blind Armenian orphans to an NBA le and I'd still call him a gravy-trainer.

  8. #108
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    No kidding.....Pop does not get the respect he deserves as a coach because he makes subtle adjustments to his squad and keeps on winning championships. We really only kept the big 3......that were drafted and developed through the Spurs system. Also, look at what Pop did with Bruce Bowen??!!! PJ would have never developed or even used a player like him.

    Im sorry, I just dont think PJ has had to do what Pop has. There is noway PJ could have had the same success with the Spurs as Pop has. I think he would have bailed out after a year or so.
    Gregg Popovich gets no love because he coaches the San Antonio Spurs, he does not suffer fools, he coaches the San Antonio Spurs, he avoids the spotlight, and he coaches the San Antonio Spurs.

    Not every coach is right for every team. Pop would struggle if he had to coach an egomaniac like Michael Jordan, Shaq, or Kobe Bryant. PJ's Jedi mind tricks wouldn't work on a guy like Tim Duncan.

  9. #109
    Hunker down you hairy Dawgs! romad_20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    1,062
    I'm still waiting on someone to tell me how many coaches under Phil have become successful, or what impact the creator of the triangle offense working with him for 20years has had. Or what he's done without 2 superstar (not just allstar) players on his team.

    I'm sounding like a hater, but I don't think rings=best coach.

  10. #110
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    I'm still waiting on someone to tell me how many coaches under Phil have become successful, or what impact the creator of the triangle offense working with him for 20years has had. Or what he's done without 2 superstar (not just allstar) players on his team.

    I'm sounding like a hater, but I don't think rings=best coach.
    Pau Gasol is not a superstar, but rather only an All-Star; so I'd say the best Phil Jackson has done without 2 superstars is to make it to the NBA Finals.

  11. #111
    Maaaaaannnn fuck.... E20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    15,142
    David Robinson would have spittle all over his monitor if he read that.
    1. Tim Duncan
    2/3 David robinson/Tony Parker(interhchangable)
    4/5 Stephen Jackson/Malik Rose(Interchangeable)
    6/7 Rookie Manu Ginobili/ Speedy Claxton.



    The 2003 Spurs were composed of a monster Tim Duncan, an aging and injured David Robinson, a bunch old, past their prime vets who could just shoot jumpers, 3 inconsistent rookies 1 of them being hot headed, and Malik Rose as the 6th man. 1 Great player, 1 former great, but aging/injured, a bunch of unproven rookies and aging vets.

  12. #112
    Hunker down you hairy Dawgs! romad_20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    1,062
    Pau Gasol is not a superstar, but rather only an All-Star; so I'd say the best Phil Jackson has done without 2 superstars is to make it to the NBA Finals.

    I agree with that point, so if he doesn't win it? Byron Scott has coached his way to the finals, Doc Rivers coaching in the finals right now shows what can happen if you've got enough talent on the team. Phil has had a top 10 player of all time on all of his championship teams(6 times with the GOAT) and two of them on the teams from 2000-2002. He lost to Pop in 2003 when Pop had a much less talented roster. He lost to Detroit and had 4, count them 4, Hall of Fame players.

    Phil is a great coach and indeed might be a better coach than Pop but it's not just some open and shut case. I think Pop has a good arguement for the best coach in the league right now.

  13. #113
    Ina world of hype, we win IronMexican's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    24,616
    toss up between pop and phil, either way you're in a good spot.

  14. #114
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    Phil is a great coach and indeed might be a better coach than Pop but it's not just some open and shut case. I think Pop has a good arguement for the best coach in the league right now.
    I don't think it's an open and shut case either. There are some things Pop definitely does better. I merely argue against the idea that Pop is obviously better because Phil Jackson is an overrated gravy-trainer.

  15. #115
    Hunker down you hairy Dawgs! romad_20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    1,062
    I don't think it's an open and shut case either. There are some things Pop definitely does better. I merely argue against the idea that Pop is obviously better because Phil Jackson is an overrated gravy-trainer.
    I totally agree.

    BTW are the girls in the above sig of age, jeez.

  16. #116
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    61
    Pop is not the best coach in the league.

    Phil Jackson... Jerry Sloan... then Pop. Don't get bias now.
    phil jax= nothing but a GRAVY TRAINER!! when he was playing in the NBA, ever since he's been coaching the NBA, even in his personal life!! phil is NOT the best coach BY FAR, sorry!!

  17. #117
    Maaaaaannnn fuck.... E20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    15,142
    Doc Rivers > Phil Jackson

  18. #118
    WooooWeeee!!!! Pucho!!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    270
    toss up between pop and phil, either way you're in a good spot.
    First of all, nice pic , but no, I'd have to disagree it seems that Phil has been runnin the same stuff since the jordan days, which makes him more of a situational coach meaning the situation has to be rite (must have a prolific sg). Pop has evolved his system, tweaking it with every addition. The system he ran with david and tim is somewhat different from that which he runs now (more guard play, small ball).

  19. #119
    Believe. underdawg's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,281
    Pau Gasol is not a superstar, but rather only an All-Star; so I'd say the best Phil Jackson has done without 2 superstars is to make it to the NBA Finals.
    I disagree - Gasol (up until the finals) has played like a superstar. He's been undefendable for the most part in the playoffs. There's been nothing done by Phil to make that happen - Gasol hangs out by the rim and get's dunks and tip-ins. What magical strategy did Phil employ to make that happen? If you think for a second that Gasol hasn't been one of the best big men in the playoffs, you are suffering from denial. Fact is that Phil has had nothing to do with the gifts he's been given for players. Is that his offense that he's running? Are you going to tell me that he's come up with a masterplan on defense? Please tell me why and how Phil is such a great coach.

  20. #120
    Believe. mikekim's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    530
    yeah...IronMexican...time for a sig change.

    I'll have to agree with what some have said in here. They're different coaches for different teams/situations. Phil is a "superstars' coach." I see him as having more of a psychological/motivator skill-set, along with his coaching ability, which is pretty damn good.

    Pop, I think, is clearly a better "X's and O's" coach. He knows the game and can get the better plan out there than Phil. He doesn't put up with any of the crap from players though. And that's where he falls short to Phil. He doesn't have the skill, or concern, to coax talent out of his players. The "relational" aspect. And like it or not, that is a significant part of coaching.

    Pop is the better pure basketball coach. Phil is not as good at pure-basketball, X's and O's...but he has Tex Winter to help him on that. And he's a much better motivator and diplomat as a coach.

    Of course, I have tons more respect for Pop. While I have had issues with his no-nonsense, "my way or the highway" approach....it's refreshing to see a team that doesn't pander or bend to these millionaire athletes. I like the mature, professional team culture that's come out of it.

  21. #121
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    its probably phil right now, and hes got the medal to prove it.

  22. #122
    Saytowns Fawtbox King lebomb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    10,747
    THAT!!!!! Phil is NOT a better coach than Pop. Especially after that asswhoopin he absorbed last night. What a joke!!!! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

  23. #123
    Veteran ManuTim_best of Fwiendz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    8,897
    Phil Jackson EXPOSED! lol!!11lollzzz!

  24. #124
    Spurs love forever RobinsontoDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Post Count
    3,000
    I also think that Ironmexican should change the sig.... those girls look no older that 14

  25. #125
    Believe. ballhog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    2,921
    Pop is not a whiner like Phil.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •