As long as there is a contract, they owe him money. If they feel Manu should not play for the Argie NT, and Manu plays, then they can trade him. It has not been the case in the past. Manu has played in a couple of summers, and has not played in others, such as the last summer when he felt his body needed a rest.
He will decide if he is fit or not to play this year in Beijing, depending if he is is healthy or not. He is a big boy and can decide for himself. He is also a pretty responsible athlete, and has proven this through the years.
That is understood, but the NT is the NT team. Nobody has the right to stop a man from representing his country.
And?
His amazing regular season was the reason the Spurs ever made it to the playoffs.
NEXT
And how do you know this? When did you get your medical degree?
Agreed.
Opinions are like assholes.
I remeber back in 2004, after Manu had a terrible game, you were of the same opinion, that Manu had to be traded. Boy were you wrong!
I'm with you. It is a business. Again, if Manu does something the Spurs are totally against, they should trade him. They can't force them not to do it.
All I'm saying is that Manu is a responsible, grown up individual. He listens to what Pop says and he reacts accordingly. But he also loves his country and knows this will be the last time he can play in the Olympics.
At the end of the day, trust he will make the right choice.
WTF? Everybody gets injured. When has Manu been injured in another key moment (ie, playoffs) that has cost us? Youn have no ing memory.
Manu is as productive playing bench minutes as any other AS playing 40 minutes. Who the cares he plays bench minutes. IIRC Duncan and Parker missed plenty of games during the regular season.
Manu had an ankle injury which was totally random. It had nothing to do with the way he plays the game. Your argument about him being a bench player or being constantly injured is bull .