Admitting to my nerdiness, I always wonder if the standings would be different if this was a ulative total league (roto) and not a head-to-head league. We're almost halfway through the regular season now and I had a minute, so I thought it was worth trying to figure out.
As of today, these are the standings in the league:
1. Downtown's Diablos 68-31-1 .685
2. Screwballs2 59-34-7 .625
3. Bashers 58-40-2 .590
4. DominicanRepublicans 56-39-5 .585
5. Ooooh That Snell! 53-42-5 .555
6. Round Trippers 49-47-4 .510
7. T Pork's Porkers 42-49-9 .465
8. Roid Rage 43-52-5 .455
9. Sons of Thunder 35-56-9 .395
10. Bexar Blaze 36-58-6 .390
11. Atrain's Army 34-59-7 .375
12. ThemBoogieKnights 33-59-8 .370
If we were doing this as a roto league (descending points in each category (12 for best and 1 for worst) and split points for ties), the standings would look pretty similar:
1. 87 -- Screwballs2
1. 87 -- Downtown's Diablos
3. 84 -- Dominican Republicans
4. 81 -- Bashers
5. 76.5 -- Round Trippers
6. 73 -- Oooh That Snell!
7. 58 -- TPark's Porkers
8. 56 -- Them Boogie Knights
9. 55.5 -- Roid Rage
10. 41.5 -- Sons of Thunder
11. 41 -- Bexar Blaze
12. 39.5 -- Atrain's Army
Obviously, the strategies that certain owners might use could be different if we were playing this season as a roto season, so the results are hardly conclusive of anything, but as a preliminary observation, it certainly seems like the scoring format makes little difference in terms of assessing the quality of the teams.