Besides, are those numbers among all voters, or of likely voters? The likely voter results have less liberals weighing in!
Palin was a member of a secession party which stated "Alaska First, Alaska Always". By putting Alaska ahead of America, she is a traitor.
...yeah I blued that text, but in reality the logic follows the diatribe spewed forth by Republicans for the past 6 years non-stop, day in and day out, without end. So all the resident Republicans get your ing asses in here and explain to me why the above statement is wrong.
Besides, are those numbers among all voters, or of likely voters? The likely voter results have less liberals weighing in!
I guess the obvious comment would be if you have no problem with states rights, you have no problem with this.
If you're some nanny stater who thinks the federal government could and should take care of everything from giving you a home and a 42" plasma to wiping your ass in the morning while you read the comics, you probably have a problem with it.
boutons getting desperate. Bimbo cutie?
How is she a bimbo? Obama's mom is the one who had a kid at 18.
So only "nanny staters" would have a problem with states wanting to secede from the U.S.? I guess real Americans are in favor of secession.Does that even make sense?
![]()
Real Americans are against communists like Obama.
"States Rights" is about the Cons utional balance of powers between the States and the Federal Government within this Nation.
If you break yourself off from this nation, you are no longer part of this nation. "States", "Rights" and "Cons ution" are then rendered meaningless.
So I'll ask again, how is secession not an act of treason?
Lincoln was a liberal who played video games in his mom's basement all day. Jefferson Davis was the real patriotic American.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...ters ialskip
Damn you, liberal USA Today
Real Americans also don't go to Black surgeons, so we know how valid their opinions are....
Read how treason is defined in the cons ution:
It is the demonrats who commited treason by "giving aid and comfort" to our enemies.Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
You cannot even infer that from the wiki definition of treason.
Her son is in Iraq...
Seriously idiot...are you really so stupid you needed someone to explain that to you?
Considering "aid and comfort to the enemy" has been dumbed down by Republicans to "anything that would make al-Qaeda smile", the definition of treason still would hold because al-Qaeda would jump for joy seeing America broken apart by seceding States.
Unless things changed, USA Today is probably the most neutral paper in print with a large circulation.
Note that the poll was among registered voters. Not likely voters! It makes a different as liberals are less reliable getting to the polls. In fact, they are less reliable period!
I don't think Sarah Palin is a traitor (which is why I blued the text...see how that works?). I just enjoy shoving old talking points back down their throats.
Now that's really a stretch.
The way demonrats gave aid and comfort was through saying we were losing, and other words that effectively increased the enemies moral. It was completely uncalled for. Our news reports inspired by democrat political figures focused so much on leaving because of the deaths we incurred that they would step up the violence. Unknown extra soldiers have died because of the anti-American rhetoric spewed by demonrats.
Obama does drugs....daily.
I wonder how many died because of Republican rhetoric....![]()
More bull .
By your ty logic seceeding from the union would "inspire" al-Qaeda to step up the violence because "The Great Satan is weakening from within! We must strike while the iron is hot!"
Has it ever occured to you that al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups might, just might, have their own independent agenda?
But you didn't shove any old talking points down anyones throats...you contrived some lame ass scenario out of two different time periods.
Seriously...why don't you guys wait until she actually opens her mouth before becoming experts on her...
Does she really scare ya'll that bad?
Look at it this way...she's a of a lot eaiser on the eyes than Cheney is.
That's not a very high threshold. I'm not saying Biden meets it (he's got some bad plugs), but it's not a high threshold.
So then you are against us? Get the out then you unpatriotic a-hole!!
I heard that during Christmas while McCain was a POW he associated and prayed with one of his commie vietnamese captors. What was up with that!?!?
Not as many that have died for being sent to an unnecessary war in the first place.
Not that I defend the incursion into Iraq, but Clinton's incursions into Somalia and Bosnia were unnecessary either. We can also question LBJ's incursion into Vietnam or Woodrow Wilson's questionable entrance into WWI. The Democrats will always holler about Bush, but they will do the same thing down the road.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)