let her live the lie B2B.
Man I must have been zoned out. I just had to go back and fix two typos. Thanks for reposting that.
In all seriousness she my not have anything to worry about but since this women didn't even bother approaching her before she started talking to her husband I'd have red flagged that in a heartbeat.
i dont know.. but angel and bo are slowly but surely making me want to use the ignore feature for the first time.
B2B, I'm sure Sly has learned quite a bit, but you didn't address the entire issue: what to do with his daughter's hair?
Once she was off the market I put her on ignore.
I kid, I kid.
I'm hoping her next hair cut she wants the Dora look again. That was so easy, I'm going to buy her some more Dora dvds.B2B, I'm sure Sly has learned quite a bit, but you didn't address the entire issue: what to do with his daughter's hair?
excellent!!
Well when I was a teenager I learned how to do nails and hair because I knew that women would eat that up. I had an Asian friend. It would give me an edge. Since its a little late for that I like the suggestion that was mentioned early about getting with a hairdresser and having her/him give Sly suggestions and tips for things they could both do together.B2B, I'm sure Sly has learned quite a bit, but you didn't address the entire issue: what to do with his daughter's hair?
Since there is a lack of female presence I would most definitely take her to have her hair done frequently. Giving her a young ladies day of pampering on a regular basis will hopefully keep her from growing up feeling that she was robbed of that sort of thing.
Damn B2B you can do nails? I just had a vision: quit your job, I'll be your pimp!! We'll offer manicures, pedicures and "other services"! You could be like Warren Beatty in that old hairdo/gigolo movie! I know zillions of women who would love an at home "pedicure" and pay well for it too
For research
But you said you'd have a hard time doing that if his female friend were single, so that trust is still conditional.That is why you have to know that you can trust your SO, which I do.
There are tons of reasons that a friendship can be threatening to a relationship, and tons of ways it can get messy, but it all has to do with the people involved and not the friendship itself. Insecurity, jealousy, mistrust, and control all = bad. Friendship = good.
Must you provoke?
I'm normally very entertained by BacktoBasics, even/especially when we disagree, but I must admit disappointment with this line of taunting. You completely missed the opportunity to suggest "Misty" was a man and tie it all in to the gay bashing rhetoric.
For shame.
Isn't intimacy necessary to be considered a SO?
And people always will disappoint. Always.
Trust is overrated.
But isn't trust necessary for complete intimacy?
The way I see it, trust isn't about having faith that your partner will never up, never make a mistake, or never piss you off. Trust is about having faith that your partner will at least be honest about their shortcomings, or knowing that they'll fess up when they've made a mistake. I've always seen lying about ing someone else as a MUCH bigger violation of my trust than the actual ing, for example.
I'm of the belief that you shouldn't say anything if you cheat. That's your cross to bear and the guilt is yours to keep.
Of course, other variables come to play such as the strength of the relationship and the severity of the cheating.
Nothing is absolute.
Yeah you're right. I know that my friends who have been cheated on were really glad that the guys never told them. It's much better to hear lab results over the phone from your gynecologist.
I can see the benefit of keeping quiet in the case of a drunken one-night stand that was a complete mistake and something you'd never do again. I don't advocate it, necessarily, but can understand the thought process -- why rock the boat if you know, REALLY know, that you won't be making that mistake again. EDIT: Since Jekka brought it up, knowing that you didn't pick up any ickies from said mistake would also be a necessary condition to keeping it quiet.
When I think of trust, however, it usually has more to do with the stuff that leads up to the cheating. I've been cheated on before, and I've been hurt by it, but more because it was a sign that the person I was with didn't trust or respect me enough to bring up the issues they had with the relationship before they went looking for something else. That's the kind of trust that I think is important, and also the kind of trust that's really hard to find. Tell me when I'm pissing you off, tell me when I'm being too clingy, tell me if that hot girl who hit on you in the club was a temptation -- no one wants to hear that , and it will possibly lead to an argument, but it's a of a lot better than hearing about it after it's too big of a problem to solve.
That's why the friend thing seems like such a non-issue to me. I would hope for, and I would work towards, a relationship in which I would know whether or not there was cause for alarm. I wouldn't have to suspect. Or wonder.
That would be another variable, Jekka.
To put simply: Someone who has enough trust in you, themselves and the relationship that they wouldn't hold back when communicating their thoughts about you, themselves, the relationship, etc.
A rarity, indeed.
Hence the fact I'm currently single.
While is not logical that I took comfort in the fact that Katie is married,the truth of the situation is that I did.
I don't think anyone is immune to at least experiencing occasional feelings of jealousy.
Personally, if I didn't care enough to feel at least a little possesive/protective when it comes to Bo, I don't think it would be worth our dating.
Know what I mean?
I know what you mean, but I don't agree.
I knew when I left for work this morning this thread was gonna blow up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
