Gov. Palin's speech tonight.

[midgetonadonkey]

I thought it was refreshing for a Republican to grow a pair and actually fight back against the freaking media and Obama the untouchable.

Props Sarah.

Don't you remember the last RNC where the old wrinkled dude gave a really angry speech against Kerry and the Democrats? All the Republicans do is give angry, negative speeches.

[midgetonadonkey]

Class as always.

Real class is staying home to take care of the re kid you had. Not putting it on a nanny and bring it out when the camera makes for a good photo op.

[T Park]

Don't you remember the last RNC where the old wrinkled dude gave a really angry speech against Kerry and the Democrats? All the Republicans do is give angry, negative speeches.

You mean like Obama's angry negative speech?

Oh wait hes different....

[T Park]

Real class is staying home to take care of the re kid you had. Not putting it on a nanny and bring it out when the camera makes for a good photo op.

Ah so, barefoot and pregnant. No woman belongs in the white house.

Any other sexist ideas you wanna bring to the forefront?

[Viva Las Espuelas]

Real class is staying home to take care of the re kid you had. Not putting it on a nanny and bring it out when the camera makes for a good photo op.

i guess that's better then when biden left behind his family after they lost his MOM in less than a month. also taking a, now $98 train trip ONE WAY, everyday like every other american does.

your dems are so funny

[T Park]

i guess that's better then when biden left behind his family after they lost his MOM in less than a month. also taking a, now $98 train trip ONE WAY, everyday like every other american does.

your dems are so funny

200 bucks each way.

But hes just like every american....

[midgetonadonkey]

i guess that's better then when biden left behind his family after they lost his MOM in less than a month. also taking a, now $98 train trip ONE WAY, everyday like every other american does.

your dems are so funny

Did they have to care for her dead body?

It's more expensive to care for a re than a dead person.

[T Park]

Did they have to care for her dead body?

It's more expensive to care for a re than a dead person.

Wow thats a groundbreaking news story.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

Did they have to care for her dead body?

It's more expensive to care for a re than a dead person.

rings are also expensive.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

200 bucks each way.

But hes just like every american....

of course. it took palin 4 months to "abandon" her family. it took biden less than a month.

[T Park]

of course. it took palin 4 months to "abandon" her family. it took biden less than a month.

I agree with Giuliani on one thing.

How come no one questions the men when they run for office, if THEY are abandoning their family?

Hypocrits.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

I agree with Giuliani on one thing.

How come no one questions the men when they run for office, if THEY are abandoning their family?

Hypocrits.

first of all it's hypocrites.

the dems are so "women focused" yet they wanna put the woman as the sole child up bringer. i don't find that very "progressive".

[whottt]

Don't you remember the last RNC where the old wrinkled dude gave a really angry speech against Kerry and the Democrats? All the Republicans do is give angry, negative speeches.

That guy was a Democrat


Zell Miller.

[T Park]

first of all it's hypocrites.

the dems are so "women focused" yet they wanna put the woman as the sole child up bringer. i don't find that very "progressive".

Why has the NOW organization not supported her?

I mean, shes furthering women's place in the world!

Oh yeah, they are a opinionated political hack organization...

[PixelPusher]

Why has the NOW organization not supported her?

I mean, shes furthering women's place in the world!

Oh yeah, they are a opinionated political hack organization...

Shame on women for not mindlessly voting for anyone with a vagina!

[T Park]

Shame on women for not mindlessly voting for anyone with a vagina!

What a shocker, the lib misses the point.

My point is, why don't they support the woman whos going for vice President?

Support the woman whos furthering the sake of women?

I mean is that NOT the point of NOW, to help further the sake of women?

[T Park]

BTW, on top of that, how come NOW hasn't defended Sarah pahlin from this bull blogging media crap about leaving the family behind and stuff?

I mean, are they NOT in favor of women doing MORE!? Are they not in favor of the woman showing strength, showing that they are more than just baby makers?

[PixelPusher]

What a shocker, the lib misses the point.

My point is, why don't they support the woman whos going for vice President?

Support the woman whos furthering the sake of women?

I mean is that NOT the point of NOW, to help further the sake of women?

Shame on feminists for not living down to your one-dimensional stereotypes of them. Issues? Values? Why, oh why don't they just vote for whoever sports a vagina?

[mrsmaalox]

What a shocker, the lib misses the point.

My point is, why don't they support the woman whos going for vice President?

Support the woman whos furthering the sake of women?

I mean is that NOT the point of NOW, to help further the sake of women?

The main reason is her pro life stance. She also calls herself a feminist. Feminist and pro-life don't match. NOW is not going to ever support a pro choice candidate, because that does not help "further the sake of women."

[mrsmaalox]

BTW, on top of that, how come NOW hasn't defended Sarah pahlin from this bull blogging media crap about leaving the family behind and stuff?

I mean, are they NOT in favor of women doing MORE!? Are they not in favor of the woman showing strength, showing that they are more than just baby makers?

They didn't defend Hilary either. No inconsistency there.

[whottt]

Shame on feminists for not living down to your one-dimensional stereotypes of them. Issues? Values? Why, oh why don't they just vote for whoever sports a vagina?

You miss the point entirely...it's not just that she's a woman. It's that she's a badass woman.


She's no token, fail to notice to your own detriment. Keep in mind...you are a hardcore Democrat and heavily biased. And surely you realize that right...you are heavily biased in favor of the Democratic Party. There is nothing she could say that would get your vote. I mean were you expecing to like her speech? I wasn't expecting you to.

[T Park]

Shame on feminists for not living down to your one-dimensional stereotypes of them. Issues? Values? Why, oh why don't they just vote for whoever sports a vagina?

Its one dimensional for them to support a woman that has a chance to break barriers?

Clearly.

Keep reaching.

[DisgruntledLionFan#54,927]

Its one dimensional for them to support a woman that has a chance to break barriers?

Clearly.

Keep reaching.

You've completely missed the point.

[T Park]

The main reason is her pro life stance. She also calls herself a feminist. Feminist and pro-life don't match. NOW is not going to ever support a pro choice candidate, because that does not help "further the sake of women."

Feminist I always thought was the woman on the poster from the 1940s that were chipping in to help with the war effort? Feminism wanting to show yes we can go and be vie president, and if something happens, leader of the free world? They can't ONCE, say "we don't agree with everything she says, but we are proud to support a WOMAN running for office"

[T Park]

You've completely missed the point.

You've completely missed my point.

Square dance everyone.