Obama - Fascist and hater of the US Cons ution

[LnGrrrR]

good point -- in a nuts - Obama wants to alter the cons ution to ENFORCE STATE and FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RIGHTS instead of protecting you - the private citizen from THE government. He is more concerned on what the State and more specifically the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD and MUST do for you.

Uhmm... you mean, he's for amending the Cons ution instead of court-mandated rulings? I thought that was the conservative position?

[ChumpDumper]

What you just posted had nothing at all to do with changing the cons ution. I know you aren't smart enough to follow your own thoughts, but that's not my problem. Why don't you find a Beck article about the supreme court and plagiarize that?

[implacable44]

What you just posted had nothing at all to do with changing the cons ution. I know you aren't smart enough to follow your own thoughts, but that's not my problem. Why don't you find a Beck article about the supreme court and plagiarize that?

Look Keith - I can't help you if you can't help yourself. Now pay attention or mommy will spank you and send you to your room where you can nominate some Sen. Stevens as worst person of the day -- and completey ignore Charlie Rangel and Sen. Todd who should be in prison but walk free with no recourse for worse transgressions.

You asked me a question - I answered it. About changing the cons ution - you want to play semantics - but should the supreme court decide in favor of one of these cases -- I imagine New York Gun laws will be the next to come under fire -- and should one of the conservative justices be replaced -- the decision will come back in favor of and the consitution as we have understood "the right to bear arms" will have been changed.

back to Obamarx and the things he said about the cons ution and it only containing "negatives".

or we could discuss his relationships and how he surrounds himself and has surrounded himself with Marxist people for 25+ years.

[clambake]

Look Keith - I can't help you if you can't help yourself. Now pay attention or mommy will spank you and send you to your room where you can nominate some Sen. Stevens as worst person of the day -- and completey ignore Charlie Rangel and Sen. Todd who should be in prison but walk free with no recourse for worse transgressions.

You asked me a question - I answered it. About changing the cons ution - you want to play semantics - but should the supreme court decide in favor of one of these cases -- I imagine New York Gun laws will be the next to come under fire -- and should one of the conservative justices be replaced -- the decision will come back in favor of and the consitution as we have understood "the right to bear arms" will have been changed.

back to Obamarx and the things he said about the cons ution and it only containing "negatives".

or we could discuss his relationships and how he surrounds himself and has surrounded himself with Marxist people for 25+ years.

are you worried?

[ChumpDumper]

I just find your constant changing of the subject amusing.

You plagiarizing Beck: "Obama wants to change the cons ution!"

Any reasonable person: "It's very difficult to change the cons ution, so even if he wanted to change it radically there is almost now chance it would actually happen."

You, trying to think for yourself for once: "Supreme Court justices will change the cons ution!"

Any reasonable person: "Their decisions don't change the cons ution."

You, feeling exposed: "See, I proved Obama wanted to change the cons ution!"

Any reasonable person: "That did nothing of the sort."

You, losing it: "Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaggh! Marx! Olbermann! Ed Begley Jr.! Spanking!"

[JoeChalupa]

This thread is so freakin' lame.

[implacable44]

I just find your constant changing of the subject amusing.

You plagiarizing Beck: "Obama wants to change the cons ution!"

Any reasonable person: "It's very difficult to change the cons ution, so even if he wanted to change it radically there is almost now chance it would actually happen."

You, trying to think for yourself for once: "Supreme Court justices will change the cons ution!"

Any reasonable person: "Their decisions don't change the cons ution."

You, feeling exposed: "See, I proved Obama wanted to change the cons ution!"

Any reasonable person: "That did nothing of the sort."

You, losing it: "Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaggh! Marx! Olbermann! Ed Begley Jr.!"

Oh you really are re ed. I didn't know they let computers in the facility. It all makes sense now.

[ChumpDumper]

Oh you really are re ed. I didn't know they let computers in the facility. It all makes sense now.

Hey, at least I know what amendments and line item vetos are. Hopefully someone emails you Glenn Beck's definitions of each.

[Shastafarian]

of course there is also the line item veto power the President holds which also can effectively change an amendment (proposed).

I must've missed something...What the are you talking about?

[ChumpDumper]

I must've missed something...What the are you talking about?

He doesn't know. He gets lost when he stops reading someone else's script.

[implacable44]

are you worried?

No not at all -- I hope Obama gets in and makes Rashid Khalidi, William Ayers, Sarkozy -- can all have appointments in his cabinet .. and Rev. Wright can be ambassador to the UN. It will be wonderful. - and we can all become citizens of the world and be taxed accordingly.

[clambake]

I must've missed something...What the are you talking about?

he's spewing the machine that's been generated to make him feel better about a purchase he's already made.

it's designed for him.

[Anti.Hero]

Most you should be ashamed for not even questioning Obama for yourselves.


Why do you think he is so articulate in 2001, then stutters and stammers in 2008? It's because he is trying so hard to hide his true intentions while on the big stage.

[smeagol]

"Please don't take my guns away . . .!"

[Shastafarian]

He doesn't know. He gets lost when he stops reading someone else's script.

Does he really think a line item veto (which must be GRANTED, it is not held) gives the president power to change an amendment?

[ChumpDumper]

Does he really think a line item veto (which must be GRANTED, it is not held) gives the president power to change an amendment?

To say nothing of the fact that if an amendment has enough votes to pass it is already veto-proof.

AND the fact that even if Obama could veto a line in an amendment, that would mean he's trying NOT to change the cons ution in that respect.

So it's ignorant AND stupid.

[ChumpDumper]

Most you should be ashamed for not even questioning Obama for yourselves.


Why do you think he is so articulate in 2001, then stutters and stammers in 2008? It's because he is trying so hard to hide his true intentions while on the big stage.

Thanks, Kreskin. I enjoy psychic political commentary.

[Centaur of the Sun]

I love hearing Beck, Limbaugh, and Hannity talking points.

Love it, love it, love it.

[Shastafarian]

To say nothing of the fact that if an amendment has enough votes to pass it is already veto-proof.

AND the fact that even if Obama could veto a line in an amendment, that would mean he's trying NOT to change the cons ution in that respect.

So it's ignorant AND stupid.

Ah so he's being rather superficial in his term "change". If the line-item veto power is given to the President, then he can alter it. Gotcha.

[ElNono]

Most you should be ashamed for not even questioning Obama for yourselves.

Why do you think he is so articulate in 2001, then stutters and stammers in 2008? It's because he is trying so hard to hide his true intentions while on the big stage.

Link to psychology study you based your conclusion on?

[Anti.Hero]

www.emperorhasnoclothes.com

[ElNono]

www.youreallfools.com

Figures...

[Anti.Hero]

www.emperorhasnoclothes.com

[ChumpDumper]

www.iamasoreloserwhomakes up.com

[Anti.Hero]

Sore loser? Is this a sporting event? It's America who has lost.

At 22, I have a greater grasp of reality than you kool-aid drinkers.


my edited link was ownage. Too bad elnono caught my ninja edit.