Reply With Quote
Performed a nut dunk on Yao, but from a flatfooted position. He probably has a poster of it in his room. Now Hill will need 3(or at least 2, how many times did he finish against Yao?).
The kid is definitely fearless and a tough son to boot.
Summer league to me was nothing more than "paralysis by analysis."
When he gets the Spurs' system down, and it becomes second nature to him, a lot of doubters are going to be pleasantly suprised.
Here's to "Havoc" Hill.
Performed a nut dunk on Yao, but from a flatfooted position. He probably has a poster of it in his room. Now Hill will need 3(or at least 2, how many times did he finish against Yao?).
Because this front office is and I'm sick of it. Do you know what they got in return for Beno? A second round draft pick. LOL A SECOND ROUND DRAFT PICK!!!! </Tommy Heinsohn>
He put a two handed dunk (basically from a stand still) right into Yao's grill!
I'm done.
ya.. im in disbelief of this fool.. just wow... beno's sack is so far down his throat.. I hope george gets the chance to thrash that scrub
im convinced your not a spurs fan.
George Hill, Efficiency Rating 6.60. Sorry, but he hasn't been able to 'thrash' Sebastian Telfair, let alone Beno Udrih.
He will tomo at 8/7 central.
And if Beno schools him, then he can brag about beating an NBA player in his 6th game.
I didn't sleep for 2 days after the Spurs lost to the Mavericks in game 7.
Are you sure your name isn't WhiteSupremacist? The two players you seem to be sticking up for today are both white. I don't know if that's a coincidence or not?
I won't brag about anything, because one game doesn't mean much, and players can have bad games.He will tomo at 8/7 central.
And if Beno schools him, then he can brag about beating an NBA player in his 6th game.
Tim Duncan is my favorite player.
then you also enjoyed our 4 championships, yes? the league does not revolve around us, there are 29 other front offices competing for that same championship. its impossible for us to be the only team improving every year, you have to take the good with bad.
I enjoyed them. Do I think there should have been more, without being a homer whatsoever? Absolutely.
I agree you have to take the good with the bad. However, there has only been bad and no good. Sorry, signing Roger Mason as the only 'major' addition the past 3 years doesn't cut it. No way in .
Well they certainly waited long enough to determine that Beno wasn't going to give any effort.
Yes, being 4-6 is something I'm sure Beno's proud of.
I'm not sure if you just don't bother to read my posts or what, but let me say it again: Nobody ever questioned whether or not he could put up numbers; his stats per 48 haven't changed from SA to Sacramento as far as I know. If given the opportunity, he'll produce everything but a winning record. If he just can't play defense, as you stated above, then why would the Spurs want him anyway?
So you start off the above post saying your argument was team related and then you go into individual stats. George has a higher winning percentage as a starter. Beno has a losing record as a starter in Sacramento. Next.
Hill shot 62 percent on the night and had 17 points, 5 assists, 6 rebounds, 0 turnovers in 36 minutes and won in regulation. Beno shot 44 percent and had 18 points, 4 assists, 4 rebounds, 2 turnovers in 41 minutes and his team lost in overtime. Hill was starting the fifth game of his career against the Rockets on the second night of a back to back. Beno was starting his 66th game against the Suns without Steve Nash on two days rest. Obviously your definition of "impressive" needs some work.
Since Beno just got done losing to a point guard starting his first NBA game, that should make him feel good.He will tomo at 8/7 central.
And if Beno schools him, then he can brag about beating an NBA player in his 6th game.
i like that you want everything to be perfect, be try to be more realistic, you'll be less stressed.
also i want to say this, you make it sound like the spurs didnt go out and try and improve this team. the spurs tried and they tried hard. but like i said, there are 29 other frontoffices trying to improve their teams too.
Waited long enough? How is that, when he wasn't getting any consistent playing time? lol Makes no sense.
I would be, with that team.Yes, being 4-6 is something I'm sure Beno's proud of.
Why would they want Barry then? Or Finley? Neither of them could play defense, yet they both got more playing time than Beno. And to answer your question more directly, for Beno's offensive skills. Clearly this team cannot score for .
I'm not sure if you just don't bother to read my posts or what, but let me say it again: Nobody ever questioned whether or not he could put up numbers; his stats per 48 haven't changed from SA to Sacramento as far as I know. If given the opportunity, he'll produce everything but a winning record. If he just can't play defense, as you stated above, then why would the Spurs want him anyway?
That's like saying "Rondo had a better record than Tony Parker last season, so he is better.". Again, it just doesn't make sense... at all. lolSo you start off the above post saying your argument was team related and then you go into individual stats. George has a higher winning percentage as a starter. Beno has a losing record as a starter in Sacramento. Next.
That's fine. The fact of the matter is, his team scored 77 points with him as the starting point guard.Hill shot 62 percent on the night and had 17 points, 5 assists, 6 rebounds, 0 turnovers in 36 minutes and won in regulation.
I'm not sure why you're highlighting overtime and regulation, like it adds a ton of minutes to the equation. lolBeno shot 44 percent and had 18 points, 4 assists, 4 rebounds, 2 turnovers in 41 minutes and his team lost in overtime.
Again, not really sure why you would add "second night of a back to back" when it's about 8 games into the season and he is about 20-years-old.Hill was starting the fifth game of his career against the Rockets on the second night of a back to back.
The Rockets were also without their starting point guard.Beno was starting his 66th game against the Suns without Steve Nash on two days rest. Obviously your definition of "impressive" needs some work.
Yeah, 4 les in 10 years really blows.
I mean, . Why can't we be the Chicago Bulls or the Boston Celtics? Why is our Front Office so incredibly incompetent that they can't completely dominate a league of 29 other organizations spending millions of dollars to do the same thing?
Why? Because .4, the Dirk Foul, and Manu's Ankle happened. And those are all things the front office couldn't control.
But yeah, it really sucks to be a Spurs fan, and I'm sure you could run things better.
ing ingrates.
OK, but how do you know that they tried hard? Have you been there for the negotiations? Of course, you could use the very same argument and flip it back at me. The difference is, I have results to back my su ions. That's what it boils down to. If you don't get things done, obviously you weren't trying hard enough.
Are you telling me the Spurs couldn't have packaged together a better deal for Artest than what the Rockets gave up? And by the way, this is just one example, I could list off many other front office -ups.
When you should have more, yes, it does.
You can control getting outcoached by a rookie head coach. You can control inserting Michael Finley into the power forward spot for the FIRST TIME THE ENTIRE YEAR.Why? Because .4, the Dirk Foul, and Manu's Ankle happened. And those are all things the front office couldn't control.
Oh, I have no question I could run things better. Absolutely no doubt in my mind, whatsoever.But yeah, it really sucks to be a Spurs fan, and I'm sure you could run things better.
Sounds like you better fill out an app there, fella.
They'll call if a position is available.
that would be a logical fallacy. if thats what you are basing things on, no need for any of this to continue.
and now theres REALLY no reason for this to continue...
Oh, and Pop played the Small Ball card well before the 2006 WCF, so you only halfway addressed one of my three arguments. But once again, I'm pretty sure Pop didn't tell Manu to foul Dirk.
And I'm really sure Avery didn't tell Dirk to get fouled, either.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions