It's funny how all of a sudden Bonner is being noticed by everyone, from fans to sports writers, and even posters on ST!!!![]()
It's funny how all of a sudden Bonner is being noticed by everyone, from fans to sports writers, and even posters on ST!!!![]()
Its nice to see them shots go in. As for Manu I really liked his approach to the game. He ended up with 8 assists and only 1 turnover. And thats a perfect game for Manu when his shot isnt falling or he's in a slump. As long as he doesnt push to hard and turn the ball over like he has a tendacy to do from time to time. It can really help this ball club. If you cant help your team at least dont hurt them while your on the court. Got away with playing small ball tonight. And I can live with that considering the type of game it was. Get them wins.....
Jason Terry is known far and wide as a dirty player who majors in tackling opposing players, and and minors in nut shots.
He's referring to Terry flagrantly fouling TP in the 4th.
What's funny? He's performing well and earning more minutes. He hasn't done much in a Spurs uniform up until this point.
Players don't usually get noticed for doing nothing, right?
Sports radio here in Dallas today is great. One broadcaster on the Ticket said that as long as the Spurs have Duncan, Ginobili, Parker and Pop that they will always be contenders and will never be counted out.
The general consensus is that the Mavs played about as well as they could and still couldn't win.
Bull .
I guess you haven't been listening to the Ticket last night after the game and this morning.
How can anyone say they played about as well as they possibly could have with one of their top scorers out due to injury?
![]()
Yeah, Shank is a P1.
No . I hadn't even thought about playing the "Smokey in a boot" card.
yet another reason to have the mavs.
mav fans their owner and franchise
SPurs would have won in regulation by double digits had Stony or house played
Like they did in December when both guys played?
Suckhouse is never going to play for us again.
But let's play the IF IF IF IF IF IF game...
If Kidd doesn't tip the ball into his own basket...
you guys have your own lists of ifs.
u mean november. different teams back then
mavs actually hurt spurs with JJ-Kidd-Terry trio of guards. had stackhouse played, it would have been easier for spurs
It's easy. The statement is that the players the Mavs had available to them last night played about as well as they could have played. That statement is independent of any discussion of who did not play for them last night.
Different teams? Then you'd be implying the Mavs have regressed if they could go from beating the Spurs by 18 to losing by 7 in double OT. How is that possible?
Why would you even bring up Stackhouse? It's clear we're talking about Howard. Stackhouse is irrelevant.
well I stick to my opinion. Mavs are better w/out Howard. many mav fans agree BTW
no we just put bowen on him![]()
Spurs were fortunate? The Mavs were fortunate Pop didn't sic Bruce on Barea sooner. He got a little too full of himself trying to go one on one and Bowen shut his ass down.
Yeah, they sound defeated! One guy was laughing about Channel 21 showing the commercial calling this "The Rivalry"! He said, "what rivalry? Spurs always win! Where is the rivalry?"
Bowen did better on Barea than Hill or Parker did, but he didn't shut JJ down. The Spurs had to use Bowen on Jet and Dirk. Barea got past Bruce on a baseline drive, although Bruce was hoping help would come sooner from Tim. Tim was late, but Barea is just so quick - even for Bruce. The Spurs had to employ the sag on him and then he would just kick it out to the perimeter scorers and slashers. JJ's pretty good.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)