seems like you are the one with the can opener
...which is exactly the argument I dont want to have. I referenced the smell, not the smoke, for this very reason.
right over my head....Unless of course you're on a boat in upstate NY.
seems like you are the one with the can opener
Doesn't matter. See above your post.
On October 2, 2005 the Ethan Allen, a tour boat operating in Lake George, New York, capsized. Twenty of the 48 people aboard died in the accident.right over my head....
http://www.ntsb.gov/pressrel/2006/060628.htm
You again. Try and stay with the thread. The smell of smoke, not the smoke itself.
What I'd like to know, is whatever happened to the old addage, "if you don't have anything nice to say, keep your ing mouth shut you obnoxious prick .... your fat mouth isn't any less repulsive than her fat ass or him smelling like a wet nasty ashtray" ?
Or something like that.![]()
Agreed, thus the reason I said "as long as youre not saying it to the person for no good reason", to paraphrase.
But get real for a second, some over-weight beast talks some to you or busts on you in some way, the first thing out of your mouth is going to start or end with "fat ".
Actually, ing is usually the first thing out of my mouth. I've been the fat and the smoking ... so those aren't anything I'd ever use as an insult to anyone. Call it empathy, compassion ... whatever. Knowing how much it ing sucks to be the butt end of the bull . That's real.
ing or ing are nice, non-gender/race/weight/height/whatever specific insults that don't allude to anything other than *them* being obnoxious/rude/selfish/inconsiderate/whatever else...![]()
stay with the poster. lionfan said it not me.
although I'd like to know exactly how smokers aren't treated as fairly as obese people
That's odd considering I didn't make the original post and you were going to post that same type of response regardless of what I wrote.
oh ok. Next time just post my response for me and save me the trouble
In any case, the bigger you get, the harder it is to do anything about it ... because of the actual physical limitations put on your muscles, bones & joints, not to mention your heart, lungs and everything else when you get to be so big.
There's got to be a point, though, where the other people living with them need to start bringing them some salads instead of cheeseburgers. They are committing manslaughter or assisted suicide at the very least, IMO.
The Litmus Test:
Which group qualifies under the ADA of 1990?
a. Smokers
b. Obese people
c. Anorexic people
d. none of the above
Choose between societal level of tolerance, in that which below group is tolerated more than the others:
a. Smokers
b. Obese people
c. Anorexic people
d. none of the above
Of the below scenarios, which is most likely to garner the appropriate attention of voters/government to require a law against its occurence?
a. Smokers smoking in public places
b. Obese people taking up too much space in public places
c. Anorexic people being...well, anorexic
d. none of the above
I could go on, and on, and on, and on...
I should since you're pretty easy to read, Blake.
Could you imagine the prosecution's argument at trial?
While I see what youre saying, under that sort of logic, a family member who knows about a drug addiction of a loved one is guilty as well.
And the drug dealer is guilty as well.
The worst someone would face is negligence, but even thats an extreme stretch of the law, IMO. But I am no lawyer.
Oh, no ... I know it would be ridiculous, but seriously, I don't get these people. We watch those shows about those kinds of people all the time. Most of them are bed-bound, and loved ones BRING them the . WTF? You'd think there has to be some kind of crime there.![]()
Yeah, I can see your point. But that is more an ethical violation than a lawful one. Unless of course said family member is forcing them to eat unhealthy or force-feeding it directly. Now I would think we were in murder/manslaughter territory.
But again, this would also include spouses who directly contribute to their spouses' alcoholism. , I personally know of a case where a spouse wouldnt let the glass get half empty in an attempt to....help along the inevitable "drink himself to death".
Really, theyre just complicit with someone's will to die. When you cant get out of bed anymore, whether thru lack of discipline or personal degredation, you signed your own death warrant.
LMAO fat people
lame.
plenty of 'healthy enough' smokers and plenty of smokers walking around with an oxygen tank.
It's also pretty easy for a smoker to put out his cigarette in a public place. Pretty hard for a fat guy to drop a couple hundred lbs in a public place.
lemme know when you need a forklift to get your smoking ass out of bed and then you might have an argument.
Nobody feels sorry for you because it's a fast fix to get rid of the smoke. Put out cigarette. Done.
Yeah, but what about anorexic people? They dont count now?
With the percentage of morbidly obese growing at an alarming rate, it's only a matter of time before legislation is introduced to curb the growing waistlines in the US.
thats ing re ed just give them a god damn treadmill and duck tape their hands to it!!
I don't really know much about anorexic people and what their status is with the ADA. Maybe they have a real gripe.
Smokers don't have any gripes. Just because you light up a cigarette on occasion doesn't mean you should get the handicap plates.
foods no. certain ingredients probably.
Do you see the circular, exclusionary point here, yet?
(lol, btw, I dont want handicap stickers)
Also, a lot of these people have enablers that help them pay for the food.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)