Aldridge for Amare would be more than I could have imagined. If Kerr squeezed Bayless out of that, it would really be something.
I agree, I am the commish and I am the same way, I was speaking more hypothetically based on how dumb it is.
Aldridge for Amare would be more than I could have imagined. If Kerr squeezed Bayless out of that, it would really be something.
Portland would be dumb to do that.....Oden would eventually get tired of being barked at by Amare.
Portland would be absolutely insane to do that deal. I would much rather have Aldridge than Amare. Aldridge is just as good as Amare in my opinion, is younger and has more upside, and is a better character guy as well. They dismantled the JailBlazers because of chemistry and character issues. I love their foundation of Oden, Aldridge and Roy. If I were Pritchard, it would take A LOT for me to alter or break that up, and I certainly wouldn't do it for Amare.
I love this deal for the Mavericks. The Blazers would wreck their core - Amare is a loser, plain and simple. Insanely talented, but a loser. He has all the tools to be a good defender but has never committed himself on that end. He's the type of guy who has no shame in padding his stats in garbage time. And Aldridge would not mean the difference between the Suns either barely missing the playoffs/going out in the first round and winning a le.
I like seeing Western compe ors get worse. It helps the Spurs in that regard too.
Actually, Kevin McHale made the decision not to trade KG to the Suns. He didn't want KG to be in the Western Conference and wanted Al Jefferson more than Amare.
what are the suns looking for though.. talent that fits them to make a championship run or expiring contracts? would make more since to me if they are looking to add talent for a run because an expiring wouldnt make sense since they have nash and shaq approaching the end.
The rumor now is Amare 4 Rudy Gay, Warrick, and Darko. I would do that right now. Gay is about as good as it gets as far as young pieces they can get for Amare.
if boozer says he opts out which says he will
I would trade boozer for amare
I would do that trade in a heartbeat
Portland would be nuts to do that trade. And it does not necessarily make Phoenix closer to a championship team.
Especially if they somehow got Conley involved.
Why was Nash spared?
It's obvious the Suns are getting ready to rebuild or do they really think they can trade a major piece (granted amare is dumber than a doorknob) and still compete this year?
It's pretty obvious to me that Shaq's game and Nash's game are incompatible.
If they're going into rebuilding mode, do it from scratch.
Nash is a pretty good PG but judging by his age and ability to play in only one speed (granted he's probably the best in the league at that speed) and not to mention the most pathetic D I've ever seen, it only makes sense to keep Nash if you want to go back to Dantoni style offense, which they probably won't do.
The irony being thier defense was better under D'Antoni then with Porter.
The reason Nash isn't being shopped is because the Suns don't have a point guard waiting to take over. The Suns only trade Nash if they can get a young point guard in return.
Ergo, my question: Why was Nash spared?
If he's not on the trading block, there will be no deals with young PG for Nash.
Better to put him up and say "I got Steve freaking Nash here to trade for a decent young PG."
I would think even Nash is there for the taking if the right player is offered.
Jason Kidd?
I bet New York jumps all over one of these two deals...
Nash to the Knicks for Lee/2nd/Rose... Knicks get their true PG, reunite him with D'Antoni, and don't hinder their 2010 salary CAP by doing so.
or, even better...
Nash to Knicks for Lee/Robinson or Chandler/Jeffries... Knicks get Nash and actually get to dump significant money in the process. With Nash and Duhon, the novelty act that is Robinson isn't necessary, so he's the likeliest of he and Chandler to be traded. The Suns would own his restricted rights and could match any reasonable offer. The Knicks would be willing to part with a quality package like Lee and Robinson because Phoenix takes Jeffries 7 million 2010-11 salary off their books, freeing it up for all the stars they'll be after that offseason. By including Robinson, they also save the likely MLE-salary he'll cost them to keep, or by including Chandler, they'll save two million and his extension going forward.
I think if the Suns really pushed, they could snatch Lee (whom the Knicks have no real interest in keeping as he's not a D'Antoni guy), Robinson and Chandler, though it may cost them Barbosa and require them to take on Rose as well.
Nash/Barbosa for Lee/Robinson/Chandler/Jeffries/Rose works and makes sense for each team.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)