Hypothetical: Would you trade Duncan for Lebron or Dwight

[Blake]

If I am so dumb, where were you to rip on all the other conversations I have been a part of?

what does you being dumb have anything to do with me ripping you for other conversations you've had in this forum?

You're being dumb for starting this thread and if this is how you post, then why in the world would I want to read any of your other crap?

Point is, to come in an act like an emo d-bag because you personally do not like a thread makes you weak.

you don't know what emo dbag or weak means.

Someone comes in and calls your thread stupid and you get all bent out of shape and take it personal.

weak emo.

As already explained to you, if you don't like it, do not post.

I don't like it, it sucks, but I'll go ahead and post, thanks.

Just move along. No need to be an a-hole and ruin the thread.

Tim thinks you're an a-hole for starting this thread.

If everyone else is in agreement, then the thread will fall off the page.

So once again, shhhhhhh.

so you admit your thread is stupid and now you want it to die?

it's ok, everyone starts a stupid thread every now and then. Just man up, admit it and maybe you can save a little face and maybe you can save yourself from looking dumber than you already do.

[DPG21920]

what does you being dumb have anything to do with me ripping you for other conversations you've had in this forum?

You're being dumb for starting this thread and if this is how you post, then why in the world would I want to read any of your other crap?



you don't know what emo dbag or weak means.

Someone comes in and calls your thread stupid and you get all bent out of shape and take it personal.

weak emo.




I don't like it, it sucks, but I'll go ahead and post, thanks.



Tim thinks you're an a-hole for starting this thread.



so you admit your thread is stupid and now you want it to die?

it's ok, everyone starts a stupid thread every now and then. Just man up, admit it and maybe you can save a little face and maybe you can save yourself from looking dumber than you already do.

No, I don't think the thread is dumb. If others did, no one would post. But instead of allowing it to die, you keep posting and making yourself look like an idiot.

Shhhhhhhhh.

[DPG21920]

cue the weak....

or the you dont know...

You don't seem to get the joke.

I don't think you know what self owning means.






weak

weak

you don't know what emo dbag or weak means.



weak emo.




I don't like it, it sucks, but I'll go ahead and post, thanks.

So carry on...

[Blake]

No, I don't think the thread is dumb.

trust me, the thread is dumb

If others did, no one would post.

no, that's not true. They come in post a 'no' with no discussion and get out because it's dumb.

But instead of allowing it to die, you keep posting and making yourself look like an idiot.

Shhhhhhhhh.

naw, I'm starting to like this thread now.

I think you should start a thread about trading Manu now.

[Blake]

So carry on...

you keep saying shhh and let it die but here you are on the merry go round with me.

what, you can't get off?

self-owned again

[Blake]

oh yeah.....about that picture you dug up

weak

[DPG21920]

He does not "man" the paint. He has most definitely lost a step. He is not bad, do not get me wrong, but he is no where near the caliber of Duncan with regards to anchoring the defense.

He's a lot better than Oberto. He has scored double-digits since he entered the league and made 2 all-star games. He also blocks shots much better than any Spur outside of Duncan.

Have you not noticed that the Cavs have been turning their whole team over and the 7'3" giant still stands?

He is a solid player, but are you trying to say the Big Z, Ben Wallace and Anderson is much better than KT, Oberto and Bonner?

No. It would be a slap in the face to Duncan. Dude took less money on his last contract; Dude stayed in San Antonio and let them rebuild while they were the oldest team in the league when he could have walked to Orlando and played with an All-NBA First Teamer in Grant Hill, while making tons of money in endorsements being back on the East coast.... not to mention the 12 years of service, 4 les, 1 new arena, etc. that he brought this team. I would never approve of any Spurs trade involving Tim unless he specifically asked for it.

I was leaning yes for Lebron no for Howard when I read this post. I'm fully in the no camp now.

They're a good team with a few players doing things that they don't normally do......

Kinda reminds me of the Celtics last year.

No to the Duncan for whoever stuff

On the other hand, as good as he is, i don't see the cavs or the magic giving up james or howard for timmy

Maybe it's a little less impossible with the cavs, because of all the 2010 thing

If I was the GM I would have to ask Duncan how he feels about it. I'd do it only if he wanted to go.

For Lebron, yes
For Howard, not so sure I would.

I wouldnt trade Tim for anybody in the NBA. Are LBJ or Kobe better players? Maybe at their positions. Is DH a better big man than Tim? I dont think so right now. Tim has paid his dues for this franchise and deserves to retire a Spur, just like David Robinson.

trust me, the thread is dumb



no, that's not true. They come in post a 'no' with no discussion and get out because it's dumb.



naw, I'm starting to like this thread now.

I think you should start a thread about trading Manu now.

Here is a selection of yes and no answers that are more than just "no" and out. So there goes that argument.

I am not on the merry go round with you. I want this thread to keep going because it interest me to have this sort of conversation from time to time. You are the only one with any reason for the thread to die, yet you keep posting and making sure that it stays at the top. That my joke of a human is self ownage.

Shhhh.

[DPG21920]

weak sums up my online life

[DPG21920]

what does you being dumb have anything to do with me ripping you for other conversations you've had in this forum?

You're being dumb for starting this thread and if this is how you post, then why in the world would I want to read any of your other crap?
.

If this is how I post what makes you want to read this crap and not others? Why do you choose to jump in on this and not the other crap?

[Blake]

Here is a selection of yes and no answers that are more than just "no" and out. So there goes that argument.

here's another "no."

They came in gave their "no" said a few more words and got out. Maybe one poster kept it going for a little while but then realized how stupid you are and ejected.

I am not on the merry go round with you.

yes you are, dumbass. what do you think this is?

you apparently don't know the definition of merry go round.

I want this thread to keep going because it interest me to have this sort of conversation from time to time.

it interests you to trade Duncan? You're a jackass.

You are the only one with any reason for the thread to die, yet you keep posting and making sure that it stays at the top.

where have I said I want this thread to die?
Just because I think this thread is dumb as sh1t doesn't mean I want it to die.

That my joke of a human is self ownage.

Shhhh.

doesnt get it
says shhh but is still on the merry go round
self owned again

[DPG21920]

here's another "no."

They came in gave their "no" said a few more words and got out. Maybe one poster kept it going for a little while but then realized how stupid you are and ejected.



yes you are, dumbass. what do you think this is?

you apparently don't know the definition of merry go round.





it interests you to trade Duncan? You're a jackass.



where have I said I want this thread to die?
Just because I think this thread is dumb as sh1t doesn't mean I want it to die.





doesnt get it
says shhh but is still on the merry go round
self owned again

shhhhh, girl.

[Blake]

If this is how I post what makes you want to read this crap and not others?Why do you choose to jump in on this and not the other crap?

No wonder you want to trade Duncan. Your line of reasoning is all focked up. Just because I respond to the crap you post in this thread, why in the world would I want to respond to all the other crap in all your other threads.

I don't have the time nor do I care enough to search through all your other sh1t.

I only have the time for this sh1tty thread.

self owned again, calling his other posts crap

[Blake]

shhhhh, girl.

girl?? that's all you've got left?

merry go round ownage

[DPG21920]

girl?? that's all you've got left?

merry go round ownage

last word

[Blake]

last word

what last word? you mean self-ownage?

[DPG21920]

[Blake]

you're an idiot.

Keep bumping the thread you want to die

self owned again

[DPG21920]

you're an idiot.

Keep bumping the thread you want to die

self owned again

Quote where I said I want the thread to die? you don't know.

[DPG21920]

1200 views

[Blake]

Quote where I said I want the thread to die? you don't know.

shhhhh....

owned yet again

you must enjoy getting bent over

dpg stuck on the merry go round

[Blake]

1200 views

dpg = 1100 views
blake = 50
others 50

but you are in "discussions with other posters"

dumbass

[DPG21920]

Beat it, hippie.

You bring crap to the table.

and your thread still sucks

Get the f out of here with this crap.

You're either an idiot or a troll. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just being an idiot.

self owned, dumbass.
Move along, dip .

yes you are, dumbass. what do you think this is?
You're a jackass.

How is my logic "focked" up? I say the merry-go-round is that I started a thread that you don't like, that might go away if you stop posting, but you won't. I say I enjoy the some of the conversation in here I like the thread.

You say, you are on the merry-go-round, , self owned. Repeat.

[DPG21920]

I am on repeat

[2slowman]

The reason I would think about it is trading an asset past its peak but with a few more years of value for one with similar potential value for a decade or more might be good for the long term.

The reasons I would quickly decide not to:

1. Jerry Krause tried to do this with the Bulls, and they still haven't recovered.
2. Team chemistry is underrated, and Tim is key to that.
3. We owe Tim far more than we can ever repay him. What he wants, he gets.
4. Why no for Lebron: I still think the best way to build a team is inside out. If we get Lebron, we can't afford the type of inside player that I think should be our cornerstone.
4a. Why no for Howard: Howard's game is based on athleticism, so it will peak earlier and not run as long. So the trading old for new doesn't carry as much weight for me in regards to Howard.

I love to watch both Howard and Lebron, and would love to see them in a Spurs jersey. I park those thoughts in the same garage with my hopes that David will return in his prime, that it would be fun to have Iceman back, that in his day, I really enjoyed having Sean on the team, and that we should get Malik back and have him contribute more even than he used to. Not gonna happen.

My 2c.

As a side note, I don't mind this thread on occasion as long as there are not too many of them. Its good to think.

[DPG21920]

owned yet again

you must enjoy getting bent over

dpg stuck on the merry go round

The reason I would think about it is trading an asset past its peak but with a few more years of value for one with similar potential value for a decade or more might be good for the long term.

The reasons I would quickly decide not to:

1. Jerry Krause tried to do this with the Bulls, and they still haven't recovered.
2. Team chemistry is underrated, and Tim is key to that.
3. We owe Tim far more than we can ever repay him. What he wants, he gets.
4. Why no for Lebron: I still think the best way to build a team is inside out. If we get Lebron, we can't afford the type of inside player that I think should be our cornerstone.
4a. Why no for Howard: Howard's game is based on athleticism, so it will peak earlier and not run as long. So the trading old for new doesn't carry as much weight for me in regards to Howard.

I love to watch both Howard and Lebron, and would love to see them in a Spurs jersey. I park those thoughts in the same garage with my hopes that David will return in his prime, that it would be fun to have Iceman back, that in his day, I really enjoyed having Sean Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_ on the team, and that we should get Malik back and have him contribute more even than he used to. Not gonna happen.

My 2c.

As a side note, I don't mind this thread on occasion as long as there are not too many of them. Its good to think.