Reply With Quote
You wouldn't recognize the truth if it slapped you across your brow with a wet carp!
When one can only see roughly 1/4 of a structure, it's pretty stupid to draw conclusions about the entire structure from it.
Misquoting and lying about the misquoting have nothing to do with any kind of truth.Finding out exactly "why" it was done has nothing to do with scientific truth.
You wouldn't recognize the truth if it slapped you across your brow with a wet carp!
Perhaps, but the same goes for you in regards to reality.
What is your scientific evidence proving it was a controlled demolition?
The collapse had all the scientific characteristics of a controlled demolition.
You keep using that word. I do not think you know what it means.
Don't be a lazy .
You said he was lying, you show me how.
Unless of course, you just read it somewhere and sucked it up as gospel without thinking for yourself, which is what we all know you did.
The collapse had none of the scientific characteristics of a controlled demolition.
You are ignorant of respectable structural engineers and you apparently are also ignorant of the reports of pools of molten steel at the scene.
Regardless, finding out "why" would explain why Silverstein committed a "crime".
You wouldn't recognize the truth if it shot you out of it's womb, let you suck on it's teets for 3 years and gave you a car when you were 18.
You remind me of a defense attorney trying to defend a guilty client.
Or a chess player behind who tries to complicate to game with unexpected pawn moves.
I'm sorry, but your obfuscations are not fooling anyone. You have failed.
You remind me of a defense attorney trying to save his client accused of murder and you show the jury a video of Farenheit: 9/11.
You have provided nothing except some internet footage of something that means nothing. Your middle name is failed. Galfailedleo.
Wow! You are clever.
Wow! You aren't.
it's even funnier reading my own fail joke the 2nd time.
So showing actual quotes from the people involved is "obfuscating", whereas making claims about what someone said, but not providing the original quotes is not.
Gotcha.
Galileo said he likes to eat kittens for breakfast.
Don't ask me to show where he said that, just take my word for it.
Try this one:
Galifaileo
I cannot understand how detached from reality someone must be in order to get so thoroughly crushed in a debate that they stop even attempting to provide evidence for their own argument, but still believe every single lie that comes out of their mouth.
It really is fascinating. As a psychologist, I'd love to do a little research on truthers to see how how happens. Perhaps 9/11 was such a traumatic event that they refuse to allow their brains to rationally encode the information into their memory? It's extremely interesting, because every truther I've met or talked to is exactly the same.
naw, mine's much worse than that.....
I usually know better.....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions