Some Numbers on Duncan, Russell, Jordan, & Shaq

[lefty]

Interesting

[stretch]

Duncan > Russell

Yes.

Duncan > Jordan

No.

[Galileo]

Well that all ofcourse doesn'r change the fact that Russell was he reason Celtics were dynasty.
He was the one who got them winning.

btw. all those all-stars and HOF's credited from being in the winning team which ofcouse not making them worse then they were.

we have gone full circle. Duncan wins at the same rate as Bill Russell.

[Galileo]

Yes.



No.

Russell > Jordan?

[Galileo]

Yes.



No.

Bulls '93

57 wins, 25 losses, MJ 3rd in MVP vote

Bulls '94, no MJ

55 wins, 27 losses, Pippen 3rd in MVP vote

MJ = 2 wins

[stretch]

Bulls '93

57 wins, 25 losses, MJ 3rd in MVP vote

Bulls '94, no MJ

55 wins, 27 losses, Pippen 3rd in MVP vote

MJ = 2 wins

Bulls without Jordan = 0 rings

Bulls with Jordan = 6 rings

6 Rings > 4 Rings

Jordan > Duncan

Fail.

[stretch]

Russell > Jordan?

ing no.

Shaq, Robinson, Hakeem, Kareem, Duncan, Wilt > Russell

[Galileo]

Bulls without Jordan = 0 rings

Bulls with Jordan = 6 rings

6 Rings > 4 Rings

Jordan > Duncan

Fail.

Celtics with Russell = 11 rings (would have been 12, but Russell got injured in the '58 finals)

11 rings > 6 rings

2 NCAA championships > 1

13 total championships > 7

58 wins per 82 games > 51 wins per 82 games

Big Men > Little Men

Russell > Jordan

Fail.

[Galileo]

ing no.

Shaq, Robinson, Hakeem, Kareem, Duncan, Wilt > Russell

If Jordan was so great, why Sam Bowie drafted before him?

[Thomas82]

If Jordan was so great, why Sam Bowie drafted before him?

I know, right? Let's not forget that Michael Jordan never had a winning record in his 5 years without Scottie Pippen, and a 1-9 playoff record.

[smrattler]

I like it!

All of it!

All the god stuff anyway!

[Thomas82]

If Jordan was so great, why Sam Bowie drafted before him?

What's up with Portland and their big man jinx? First Bill Walton, then Sam Bowie, and now Greg Oden.