Reply With Quote
True. but oppression occurs regardless of cons utional protection. what you're really talking about is changing people's at udes; not the law per se. right?
Statement One (Gays want equal rights)
Statement Two (Gays want extra rights)
So what's everybody talking about?
True. but oppression occurs regardless of cons utional protection. what you're really talking about is changing people's at udes; not the law per se. right?
Sex isn't just for fun but with humans it also isn't just for reproduction
We shouldn't allow hetero couples to have anal sex because it destroys the sanctimony of reproduction.
The female is the only gender that can reciprocate a man"s reproductive needs, and vice-versa. To be sexually attracted to someone of the opposite sex is in line with your natural sexual function. Whether or not you procreate is irrelevant to the fact that you are motivated to have sex with someone you could naturally procreate with.
America should just embrace its Puritan past.
Prejudice and oppression are different things -- one operates at an individual level, the other operates at an ins utional level. Personal prejudice would still continue regardless any changes in law (in the immediate future, at least), but systemic oppression would be considerably more difficult.
My long term vision of a perfect world would include changing people's at udes and erasing all individual prejudices, but systemic and ins utional oppression has to be the first to fall in order for that to have even the slightest chance of happening. In the here and now, I think the laws should change in order to represent all people equally, and I really give all about whether or not everyone is happy and comfortable with it. At udes of hate need not be coddled.
According to who?
If I think another man is attractive, not that I'm attracted to him, does that make me gay?
I never really tried to argue against your opinions.
I really answered your questions like 'what age did I find out i was straight' out of politeness because I didn't want you to feel that I was not answering the posts like you stated that I was/wasn't doing.
Don't worry. I won't answer your questions any more.
I'm not sure what you're disputing....can you be more specific?
actually all it took was one post from you.
After all these pages, not only do I not know what point you're trying to make, I am increasingly unconvinced that you know what point you're trying to make.
Not unless you have anal sex with him!
But, if he sucks his , he's still not gay?
Wait a sec, who's sucking who?
You are implying that you are only "in line with your natural sexual function" if you are attracted to someone of the opposite sex. So if someone is attracted to a person of the same sex..you are saying they are not natural by someone's standards and I was curious as to whom. Someone who is powerful enough to determine what is natural to an entire species would be nice to know.
To be fair, Blake, maybe I misunderstood the point you were trying to make, if you were trying to make one at all.
I'm still flattered, though.
Some people feel that you get one free pass on being gay. (i.e. Trying it once.)
If you do it again, then your gay.
(This doesn't seem to apply to women. you can eat all the pussy you want andstill be straight. )
I'm good then.
I never heard of that! I thought it was only if you were being paid a bunch of money.
You, BacktoBasics, are an idiot.
I know you are illiterate so maybe someone can show you just how directly I'm aiming this post.
It's a fact? Prove it.The fact of the matter is that regardless of genetics these are people just like the blacks, mexicans, jews, midgets and whoever else reside in this Country.
All Americans share the same rights.To treat anyone like less of a human being for any reason other than criminal is disgusting. These people want union rights that are equal to that of marriage.
Nobody is being treated like less of a human being.
I have no problem with gay marriage. I have already told you twice now.I don't think they give two s what you call it (even if it does open additional doors for prejudices). They're people just like we are and deserve to be respected for who they are and their opinions. I'm sick of people like Blake excusing bigotry on a basis of technical unproven bull just so they can sleep at night.
Not only can you not read, but you also have memoryhave thei problems.
You are an idiot.
I have no problem with them adding laws to extend extra rights and privileges to the ones we have in place already.You're an inhumane bigot if you feel these people should be treated differently. Its an embarrassment to the advancement of our race and society that people like that exist in modern day America.
This started when you compared slaves back in the 1800s that got whipped, beaten, captured, sold, bought, and treated the same as cattle to sexuals of today that have and run their own TV networks, shows, movies and can legally walk down any street in America and hold hands with each other.
Maybe someone can help you read this as I am directing this to you, BacktoBasics:
You are an idiot.
I know some guys who refuse to acknowledge that they think another man is attractive. You don't have to be gay to know that Brad Pitt, Hugh Jackman, Denzel Washington are studs.
No problem.
I still think you are an idiot for calling out the Surgeon General of the United States, but that's a different matter.
It was something my ex boyfriend told me once
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
