Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 80
  1. #26
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    What is a post-season?
    The later part of the season?

  2. #27
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Why is it called the 'regular season', instead of just 'the season'?

  3. #28
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    The later part of the season?
    Nope.

    Post means "After". So Post-season means After the season.

    You're better than this Nono, you and I both know it.

  4. #29
    Believe. jason1301's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    559
    Why are you talking about the Playoffs? Didn't you read the post up there? It says 82 game season, not the Playoffs.

    Please learn to read first.

    Manu has NEVER played 82 games in one season.
    you read too much into it dude, let me tell you something regular season means nothing if you cant win during playoffs. Who cares if Manu hasn't had an 82 game season. He averages 17 playoffs games, thats what matters the most.

    Oh and we are talking who means more to his respective team.

    I would take Manu and his 17 playoff games, over the three games. Thanks but Bynum so far is just garbage.

    Wake up buddy Bynum was never important to this Lakers team to begin with. Potential is all he has, don't act like he is on par with proven vets like Manu.

  5. #30
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Because the Lakers have a better team, that makes you more intelligent?
    Not at all, I"m saying in a basketball sense. People are saying I'm stupid for thinking Bynum can create as much of an impact as Manu.

    It shows that Manu's return did not offset Bynum's return or that Bynum's return did not offset Manu's return. One way or the other, we'll find out who made the bigger impact. If Manu's the savior, he'll put the Spurs over the top. If Bynum's the savior, he'll put the Lakers over the top.

  6. #31
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Nope.

    Post means "After". So Post-season means After the season.

    You're better than this Nono, you and I both know it.
    Sorry, I call a full season both the regular season and playoffs. At the very end, he has played over 82 games every single year of his career except for one, and now it's going to be two. He has actually played over 90 games every year, except two, which makes the whole 'Ginobili is injury prone' argument re ed, and by extension, any comparison with Bynum idiotic at best.
    Who is Bynum? What has he ever done, other than wrestle a $80 million contract?

  7. #32
    Ender's Teacher
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    441
    It's so worthless to have this discussion. Manu is not garbage, and neither is Bynum, and fans of the opposite team are going to argue until they grow wrinkles about who is more important to their team. Agree to disagree and stop name-calling like middle schoolers.

  8. #33
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Sorry, I call a full season both the regular season and playoffs. At the very end, he has played over 82 games every single year of his career except for one, and now it's going to be two.
    You're a stubborn disappointment. No point in arguing with you.

  9. #34
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Manu is not garbage, and neither is Bynum, and fans of the opposite team are going to argue until they grow wrinkles about who is more important to their team.
    Smart man. I agree.

  10. #35
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    You're a stubborn disappointment. No point in arguing with you.
    There's nothing to argue about. You made a point and it proved to be not true.
    And please answer the question. What did Bynum ever do? Has he even played a playoff game yet?

  11. #36
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    But Bynum's overall impact on the team is equivalent to Manu's impact on the team. .

    Bullshiiit

  12. #37
    Believe. jason1301's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    559
    There's nothing to argue about. You made a point and it proved to be not true.
    And please answer the question. What did Bynum ever do? Has he even played a playoff game yet?
    exactly, he can't!

  13. #38
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    We'll find out in the WCF.

  14. #39
    maaaaan mabrignani's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,131
    sure the has been apart of the lakers team for 82 games in a season but he never in his years has been close to ginobili's worst season

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    We'll find out in the WCF.
    Bynum gives only depth to Lakers. He is not an impact. Using Bynum means Mbenga will be bench. Odom and whole Lakers are good enough.

  16. #41
    maaaaan mabrignani's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,131
    We'll find out in the WCF.
    if the fakes make it there

  17. #42
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Bynum gives only depth to Lakers. He is not an impact. Using Bynum means Mbenga will be bench. Odom and whole Lakers are good enough.
    That's exactly it. It's the impact, not Bynum himself. Bynum can score 0 points and still be a huge impact.

    With Bynum back, the Lakers also get Luke Walton, Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujacic back. The Lakers bench has been sucking ever since Bynum went down because the bench lost Ariza + Odom (they both became starters).

    It's the net effect of Bynum's return, it's not about his boxscore.

    Luke will go back to the starting lineup which minimizes his weaknesses. Ariza+Odom will rejoin Farmar/Sasha on the bench which instantly makes the bench a very dangerous unit, not the useless mofo's they are right now.

    Bynum's return changes the Lakers from a 5 man team back to the 10 man team they were before he went down.

    To me, that's a huge impact. Look beyond the boxscore fellas.
    Last edited by Allanon; 03-28-2009 at 08:29 PM.

  18. #43
    Ina world of hype, we win IronMexican's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    24,616
    Because the Lakers have a better team, that makes you more intelligent?
    Glad to see you finally get it

  19. #44
    #FreeGiuseppe BlackSwordsMan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    14,648
    4 rings got

  20. #45
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    Manu is a better player right now than Bynum.

    But Bynum's overall impact on the team is equivalent to Manu's impact on the team. The primary reasons being Defense and the fact that the Lakers bench flat out sucks when Bynum's out.

    Manu brings an instant positive boxscore, Bynum brings back players 6-10 in the Lakers rotation.
    I remember you Allanon that you are on the spurs bandwagon and on the spurs bandwagon we don't say manu impact is equivalent to Bynum impact.

  21. #46
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    I remember you Allanon that you are on the spurs bandwagon and on the spurs bandwagon we don't say manu impact is equivalent to Bynum impact.
    Hey, I said Manu > Bynum and I said that the Spurs will be champs if they beat the Lakers (another thread).

    Ok sir. I'll shut my mouth until the Playoffs out of respect for you.

  22. #47
    Straya AussieFanKurt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,065
    Allanon gets my respect.

  23. #48
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    That's exactly it. It's the impact, not Bynum himself. Bynum can score 0 points and still be a huge impact.

    With Bynum back, the Lakers also get Luke Walton, Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujacic back. The Lakers bench has been sucking ever since Bynum went down because the bench lost Ariza + Odom (they both became starters).

    It's the net effect of Bynum's return, it's not about his boxscore.

    Luke will go back to the starting lineup which minimizes his weaknesses. Ariza+Odom will rejoin Farmar/Sasha on the bench which instantly makes the bench a very dangerous unit, not the useless mofo's they are right now.

    Bynum's return changes the Lakers from a 5 man team back to the 10 man team they were before he went down.

    To me, that's a huge impact. Look beyond the boxscore fellas.
    If that your point of view, I would agree with that. Don`t know Lakers rotation or chemistry, to have own judgement.

  24. #49
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Glad to see you finally get it

  25. #50
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Not at all, I"m saying in a basketball sense. People are saying I'm stupid for thinking Bynum can create as much of an impact as Manu.

    It shows that Manu's return did not offset Bynum's return or that Bynum's return did not offset Manu's return. One way or the other, we'll find out who made the bigger impact. If Manu's the savior, he'll put the Spurs over the top. If Bynum's the savior, he'll put the Lakers over the top.
    The Lakers right now without Bynum are still better than Spurs with Manu, so what does this prove?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •