Why is it called the 'regular season', instead of just 'the season'?
The later part of the season?
Why is it called the 'regular season', instead of just 'the season'?
Nope.
Post means "After". So Post-season means After the season.
You're better than this Nono, you and I both know it.
you read too much into it dude, let me tell you something regular season means nothing if you cant win during playoffs. Who cares if Manu hasn't had an 82 game season. He averages 17 playoffs games, thats what matters the most.
Oh and we are talking who means more to his respective team.
I would take Manu and his 17 playoff games, over the three games. Thanks but Bynum so far is just garbage.
Wake up buddy Bynum was never important to this Lakers team to begin with. Potential is all he has, don't act like he is on par with proven vets like Manu.
Not at all, I"m saying in a basketball sense. People are saying I'm stupid for thinking Bynum can create as much of an impact as Manu.
It shows that Manu's return did not offset Bynum's return or that Bynum's return did not offset Manu's return. One way or the other, we'll find out who made the bigger impact. If Manu's the savior, he'll put the Spurs over the top. If Bynum's the savior, he'll put the Lakers over the top.
Sorry, I call a full season both the regular season and playoffs. At the very end, he has played over 82 games every single year of his career except for one, and now it's going to be two. He has actually played over 90 games every year, except two, which makes the whole 'Ginobili is injury prone' argument re ed, and by extension, any comparison with Bynum idiotic at best.
Who is Bynum? What has he ever done, other than wrestle a $80 million contract?
It's so worthless to have this discussion. Manu is not garbage, and neither is Bynum, and fans of the opposite team are going to argue until they grow wrinkles about who is more important to their team. Agree to disagree and stop name-calling like middle schoolers.
You're a stubborn disappointment. No point in arguing with you.
Smart man. I agree.
There's nothing to argue about. You made a point and it proved to be not true.
And please answer the question. What did Bynum ever do? Has he even played a playoff game yet?
Bullshiiit
exactly, he can't!
We'll find out in the WCF.
sure the has been apart of the lakers team for 82 games in a season but he never in his years has been close to ginobili's worst season
Bynum gives only depth to Lakers. He is not an impact. Using Bynum means Mbenga will be bench. Odom and whole Lakers are good enough.
if the fakes make it there
That's exactly it. It's the impact, not Bynum himself. Bynum can score 0 points and still be a huge impact.
With Bynum back, the Lakers also get Luke Walton, Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujacic back. The Lakers bench has been sucking ever since Bynum went down because the bench lost Ariza + Odom (they both became starters).
It's the net effect of Bynum's return, it's not about his boxscore.
Luke will go back to the starting lineup which minimizes his weaknesses. Ariza+Odom will rejoin Farmar/Sasha on the bench which instantly makes the bench a very dangerous unit, not the useless mofo's they are right now.
Bynum's return changes the Lakers from a 5 man team back to the 10 man team they were before he went down.
To me, that's a huge impact. Look beyond the boxscore fellas.
Last edited by Allanon; 03-28-2009 at 08:29 PM.
Glad to see you finally get it![]()
I remember you Allanon that you are on the spurs bandwagon and on the spurs bandwagon we don't say manu impact is equivalent to Bynum impact.
Hey, I said Manu > Bynum and I said that the Spurs will be champs if they beat the Lakers (another thread).
Ok sir. I'll shut my mouth until the Playoffs out of respect for you.![]()
If that your point of view, I would agree with that. Don`t know Lakers rotation or chemistry, to have own judgement.
The Lakers right now without Bynum are still better than Spurs with Manu, so what does this prove?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)