Reply With Quote
The Building 7 Chronicles.
Whhoooooohhhoooooo.. Sccaaaaaaarrrryyyyyy..
New Information on the Death of 911 Eyewitness Barry Jennings
April 16, 2009
By Jack Blood
Barry Jennings, a key 9/11 eyewitness who was an emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority, passed away last August 2008 at age 53 from undisclosed cir stances. Mr. Jennings was an eyewitness to the devastation of the World Trade center towers on September 11th 2001.
On the morning of 911 Barry Jennings with Michael Hess, (one of Rudy Giuliani’s highest ranking appointed officials, New York city’s corporation counsel), entered the famed Building 7.
It was just after the first attack on the North tower, but before the second plane hit the South Tower, when Barry Jennings escorted Michael Hess to the World Trade Center Tower 7. Mr. Jennings recalls a large number of police officers in the lobby of WTC 7 when they arrived. The two men went up to the 23rd floor, but could not get in, so they went back to the lobby and the police took them up in the freight elevator for a second try. When they arrived on level 23, at the Office of Emergency Management (FEMA),) they found it had been recently deserted, “coffee that was on the desk, smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half eaten sandwiches”.
At that point he made some phone calls, and an un-named individual told them to “leave, and leave right away”. Jennings and Hess then proceeded to the stairs, and made it to level 6, when there was an explosion, and the stairwell collapsed from under their feet, Mr. Jennings was actually hanging, and had to climb back up. They made it back up to level 8, where Barry Jennings had a view of the twin towers, both buildings were still standing. This is an important detail, as many debunkers have used Mr. Jennings statements out of context to claim the damage came to WTC 7 from the towers collapsing, not the case according, to Mr. Jennings.
When they made it to the lobby, Mr. Jennings found it destroyed and littered with dead bodies. He said it looked like, “King Kong had came through it and stepped on it, (it was) so destroyed, I didn’t know where I was. So destroyed that they had to take me out through a hole in the wall, that I believe the fire department made to get me out.” Shortly after he made it out, he was seen on several news channels telling his story.
Mr. Jennings was admittedly confused as to why Building 7 had to come down at all, and does not accept the official reason that the noises he heard were from a fuel oil tank, “I know what I heard, I heard explosions”.
Jennings testimony was recorded by Loose Change for the Final Cut version of the extremely popular do entary, but was edited out at the final stage due to Jennings misgivings about losing his job, and endangering his family.
The BBC later interviewed Jennings for a “911 debunking special” and Jennings seemed to retract the testimony given to Loose Change. Subsequently the creators of the film released the original interview to protect their own credibility.
Barry Jennings passed away shortly thereafter and coincidentally just a few days before the long awaited NIST report on Building 7 was released to the public. It is quite possible that Jennings would have exposed the cover story of NIST, and their overall excuse that the 47 story building was the first and only skyscraper felled by fire. He never got that chance.
New Information
Yesterday, April 15th 2009 I was contacted by “Loose Change” director, and narrator Dylan Avery who said that he had recently begun investigating the death of Barry Jennings, and had found some new information relating to his death.
It seems that there is a very good possibility that Jennings’ death could have been due to foul play. Though the investigations are on going, initial findings are somewhat alarming. The conclusion is still forthcoming, but I was shocked by what I heard.
It seems that Dylan had hired a private investigator to look into Jennings death which remains shrouded in mystery. His motive was simply to bring some closure to the life of Barry Jennings, and in doing so to honor the memory of this brave American. The Investigator ended up referring the case to Law enforcement before refunding his pay, and told Dylan never to contact him again. Very unusual to say the least. Dylan also paid a visit to the Jennings home. He found it vacant and for sale.
Personally, something is really beginning to stink here. Why would a highly paid PI refuse to continue his investigation? Why did he refer the matter to police? He is not talking. What is he afraid of. Was he warned to cease and desist? If so by whom?
These are some of the new questions revolving around the Jennings case.
In every major cover up from the JFK assassination to Iran Contra, we can see one common thread. The untimely death of eyewitnesses. Barry Jennings was not only an important and most credible eyewitness, but he openly refuted much of the government, and media version of events. He was a liability.
Clip from Dylan Avery on DEADLINE LIVE today where he tells the story (4/16/2009)
http://edwardrynearson.wordpress.com...arry-jennings/
Emergency Coordinator Barry Jennings gives his explosive account from inside WTC7 hours before its collapse on 9/11.
http://edwardrynearson.wordpress.com...arry-jennings/
The Building 7 Chronicles.
Whhoooooohhhoooooo.. Sccaaaaaaarrrryyyyyy..
so brave that he began to retract what he was saying.
if his testimony was so damaging, why did it take almost 7 years to get to him?
it wasn't the first 99 threads that galileo has started on conspiray theories, but it was this 100th that finally made me a believer.
For those interested....
LinkJennings and Hess then proceeded to the stairs, and made it to level 6, when there was an explosion, and the stairwell collapsed from under their feet, Mr. Jennings was actually hanging, and had to climb back up. They made it back up to level 8, where Barry Jennings had a view of the twin towers, both buildings were still standing
This would imply that there were explosions in WTC7 before debunkers say the damage was caused by the collapsing twin towers...
The WTC7 Videos RG doesn't want you to see..
Let's cut the bull ....
When that came out it was the video YOU didn't want to see. You and the other twoofers denied that damage existed. Now it's your smolking gun?
Yes, let's cut the bull and read what you think really happened on 9/11.Let's cut the bull ....
Funny you left out the symmetrical damage too...When that came out it was the video YOU didn't want to see. You and the other twoofers denied that damage existed. Now it's your smolking gun?
I never left out the symmetrically appearing damage. No one ever left it out. I posted the pictures several times. The pictures speak for themselves -- the damage looks symmetrical and reinforces all the eyewitness accounts you tried to deny as well.
I can see how you want to lie about it now, because you twoofers were flat out denying the damage when these pictures first came out. You guys were saying it was photoshopped.
....but is WTC7 symmetrical building damage from collapsing debris?
Hey check out my post from October 2007!
Yes, it's certainly the video we didn't want us to see!And last (for now) but not least, two video stills showing tremendous damage to the south side of 7 WTC caused by the collapse of the north tower:
Here's the video from which the first still was taken:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_3uUQt8bu6k
and the second:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...16413&hl=en-CA
pffff....And last (for now) but not least, two video stills showing tremendous damage to the south side of 7 WTC caused by the collapse of the north tower:
....look at front roof-line of WTC7. As the building falls, this roof-line stays pretty much parallel to the ground from start to finish. Also look at the roof-line on the right side of WTC7. It stays parallel to the ground as the building falls too.
The fact that the roof-lines fall parallel means that the collapse of WTC7 started precisely simultaneously beneath every beam supporting both roof-lines. Because gravity causes objects to accelerate as they fall, an object that begins falling first will always stay ahead of an object that begins falling after-wards.
As seen by the roof-lines, the entire structure begins falling at the same time.
This can ONLY mean that the resistance holding the entire structure up vanished instantly.
Or, here's another way to look at it...
There was absolutely no angular momentum involved in the collapse. A simple look at the video above shows that. The angular momentum would result only from one section of the building failing before another section. Think back to WTC2's tilt before it collapsed.
WTC7's roof-line showed no tilt, therefore there was no angular momentum. Therefore every supporting beam by definition HAD to fail simultaneously.
What's really interesting about this is that the NIST's preliminary explanation for WTC7's collapse is the exact opposite of their explanation for the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2. The NIST said in WTC1 and WTC2 that the heat caused the horizontal beams to basically sag, pulling in the vertical beams that supported the building.
For WTC7, the NIST is saying that the some vertical beams failed first, and this somehow caused the horizontal beams to fail simultaneously, which then somehow caused the simultaneous collapse of every other remaining vertical beam in the building.
No wonder it's taken over 5 years the the NIST STILL doesn't have a final report on why WTC7 collapsed the way it did. There most current "theory" is total b.s. Asymmetrical damage by definition would cause asymmetrical failures, not simultaneous universal failures....
Hey, I gave another link to the video we didn't want us to see in April 2007 (second link)!
Very quickly. Not instantly. After the column 79 failed, the redistribution of forces and resulting failures happened very quickly.
Now you are admitting WTC2 tilted?Or, here's another way to look at it...
There was absolutely no angular momentum involved in the collapse. A simple look at the video above shows that. The angular momentum would result only from one section of the building failing before another section. Think back to WTC2's tilt before it collapsed
You really need to keep track of your arguments.
Too bad it fell toward the south. That can be seen in videos from the right angle and in the resulting debris pile. So there was angular momentum.WTC7's roof-line showed no tilt, therefore there was no angular momentum. Therefore every supporting beam by definition HAD to fail simultaneously.
WTC7 was built over an electrical substation, so its structure was different. The damage was different.What's really interesting about this is that the NIST's preliminary explanation for WTC7's collapse is the exact opposite of their explanation for the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2. The NIST said in WTC1 and WTC2 that the heat caused the horizontal beams to basically sag, pulling in the vertical beams that supported the building.
For WTC7, the NIST is saying that the some vertical beams failed first, and this somehow caused the horizontal beams to fail simultaneously, which then somehow caused the simultaneous collapse of every other remaining vertical beam in the building.
As you show in your own linked video, the east penthouse collapsed first. Pretty asymmetrical.No wonder it's taken over 5 years the the NIST STILL doesn't have a final report on why WTC7 collapsed the way it did. There most current "theory" is total b.s. Asymmetrical damage by definition would cause asymmetrical failures, not simultaneous universal failures....
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 04-18-2009 at 12:03 AM. Reason: better clarity
Hey check out my post from October 2007!
Yes, it's certainly the video we didn't want us to see!
Why'd you switch screen names?
I don't know, galileo......just for fun I guess
Are you saying I'm Blake?
That can be debunked pretty quickly if he's not posting over a proxy server. I'm not.
I know there are some like mouse that change screen names after they get owned, but after 40,000 posts and thousands of ownings over posters such as dan, I doubt he feels the need to waste time using a troll.....
20 (10 members & 10 guests)
Blake, PixelPusher, ChumpDumper, MaNuMaNiAc, Nbadan, rold50, Viva Las Espuelas, tim_duncan_fan, MannyIsGod, Crookshanks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
