Reply With Quote
You think I give a if the ers who endorsed torture are democrats? What the ?
I don't care.
She lied ten seconds into her first answer. A bald-faced, verifiable lie.
Guess she wanted to get the fail out of the way.
The apple didn't fall far from the tree.
You think I give a if the ers who endorsed torture are democrats? What the ?
No, but your hero does.
i don't have a hero.
do you?
what did she lie about?I don't care.
She lied ten seconds into her first answer. A bald-faced, verifiable lie.
Guess she wanted to get the fail out of the way.
The apple didn't fall far from the tree.
The torture was authorized before the legal rationale for it was completed.
I was wondering the same thing.
It wasn't torture! Maybe since it was questioned, they wanted a complete legal opinion on the matter.
We sentenced a Japanese officer 15 years hard labor for doing it in World War II.
We court martialled US soldiers for doing it in two wars.
We sentenced US sheriffs and deputies to prison sentences for doing it.
What precisely is your legal precedent proving it is not torture and a criminal offense?
They wanted someone to say it was ok after they authorized it. They ignored all the arguments and warnings from the military saying it was wrong.Maybe since it was questioned, they wanted a complete legal opinion on the matter.
99.9 percent of the human race would do what ever they had to do to save a love ones life. That includes Obama. Silly silly silly. Again he does not want to talk about the trillion. He does what got him there. Bash Bush. LOL at waterboarding to get info out of people.
"what, you know when and where the USA will be attack...why won't you tell us......okay, its cool.....would like a sandwich"
Some of you are soooooooooo into yourselves it makes me laugh.
I do laugh at it. It doesn't appear to work.
dubya warned that no captured American was to be tortured (or else), while dubya tortured his captured.
American exceptionalism, the rules apply to the rest of the world that don't apply to USA.
so the release all the memos concerning it's efficacy, rather than taking someones word for it.
by the nsc, what says otherwise?
if this is so, we need to know the full extent of all the memos about the procedures and their efficacy before making a pro or con argument.CHENEY: Therefore, the tactics are not torture. We did not torture. The memos laid out the extent of exactly how far we could go before it would become torture, because it was important we not cross that line into torture.
relying on the huffington post doesn't cut it.
Memos that say "it is our understanding" do not cons ute proof of anything.
What else needs to be said?
Screw Obama. Doesn't the new administration want transparency? :P
The way I see it, if people don't have to suffer for their mistakes, what's to stop them?
Isn't that the belief behind the Tea Parties? The reason behind being against the bailouts?
Except in this case, if we investigate and find something, it will be a benefit to getting these sticks out of office, as opposed to letting the world's financial makeup collapse by not bailing out the banks (which I am ideologically opposed to as well.)
30 to 50 illegal aliens in the country and obama gives them the nod, and then the Obama administration is trying to convince us they're intrested in the "LAW". Obama set the situation up and now is playing like it's not him doing this witch hunt it's the justice department it's congress.Well finally obamiwan is deliverying on one campagin promise transparancy .. this is a transparent attempt to put the focus on the last administration so we don't focus on the faliures of this one. By the way everyone in America knew these s were being tortured, the only suprise is that it wasn't worse. We all knew it and supported it after the events of 9/11.I hope the Obama adminsitration prosecutes this line, it will send the people over the top. I particularlly like the part of pelosi's bald face lies about not knowing anything about this.
Wow.
That made no sense at all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions