Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 46
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Post Count
    63
    we need a sg that can dribble,dunk,and also play d tony allen will be perfect for his spot

  2. #2
    fuk yo team clown tp2021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,452
    please don't go starting a load of threads

  3. #3
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    we need a sg that can dribble,dunk,and also play d tony allen will be perfect for his spot
    allen>mason

  4. #4
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Post Count
    63
    please don't go starting a load of threads
    just wait got 2more in short

  5. #5
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Post Count
    63
    we played close games all year winning wit offense its tyme 2 get back to playing defense trade mason no dribbling ass cant finish a fast break ass cause he is to slow ass for someone who can defend and at least give us ten points a game cause mason went scoreless twice against dallas in the playoffs

  6. #6
    Motivation for me... Stringer_Bell's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    4,270
    More like "why we should not let people with less than 100 posts start topics"

    But I agree about winning close games all year with offense, would be better with stops.

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    110
    I personally prefer Hill to either of them.

  8. #8
    Scarlett our Goddess4ever
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    12,836
    we need a sg that can dribble,dunk,and also play d tony allen will be perfect for his spot
    Other than the dunking work, Tony Allen doesn't do any job better over Mason. Mason might have the best dribbling skills in the group of shooting guards, and his defensive level is also above TA's by tens of feet. Even though his name is Tony Allen, he is not even half as good as either Ray Allen or Tony Longoria.

  9. #9
    Sarah Palin is a Maverick freemeat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    1,101
    I personally prefer Hill to either of them.

  10. #10
    Fan Since 1973 Twisted_Dawg's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    2,804
    Other than the dunking work, Tony Allen doesn't do any job better over Mason. Mason might have the best dribbling skills in the group of shooting guards, and his defensive level is also above TA's by tens of feet. Even though his name is Tony Allen, he is not even half as good as either Ray Allen or Tony Longoria.
    Rogue,

    Who is the female in your sig?

  11. #11
    Defense Wins Championships Texas_Ranger's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    13,364
    Rogue,

    Who is the female in your sig?
    Thats Becky Hammon.

  12. #12
    Suck One Pop poop's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,157
    we should certainly shop him around as trade bait and see if we can possibly get a good deal involving him.

    he does ONLY ONE thing, and that is shoot spot up 3's. if we can get a decent slasher who can get to the rim for him, DO IT.

  13. #13
    Rubber Dinghy Rapids Bro Muser's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,204
    Mason is a legit SG who's pros outweigh cons IMO, what we need is one more slasher at the 3 who can open the court more to allow Mason more open looks.

  14. #14
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Apparently a lot of people don't understand how the Spurs system works..we need role playing shooters like Mason, he's one of the best shooters in the NBA..

    the SF position should be our slasher..

    Mason was clearly playing very well for us until the PG experiment..it wasn't a coincidence..

  15. #15
    Believe. chrisattsu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    248
    Other than the dunking work, Tony Allen doesn't do any job better over Mason. Mason might have the best dribbling skills in the group of shooting guards, and his defensive level is also above TA's by tens of feet. Even though his name is Tony Allen, he is not even half as good as either Ray Allen or Tony Longoria.
    Rouge,

    I love your photoshopping skills. Becky is chucking the deuce, and you chopped off the index finger. Gotta fix the discoloration halo. Dead give away.

  16. #16
    Rubber Dinghy Rapids Bro Muser's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,204
    Apparently a lot of people don't understand how the Spurs system works..we need role playing shooters like Mason, he's one of the best shooters in the NBA..

    the SF position should be our slasher..

    Mason was clearly playing very well for us until the PG experiment..it wasn't a coincidence..


    Agrred with everything.

  17. #17
    BOlieve manufan10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    10,210
    apparently a lot of people don't understand how the spurs system works..we need role playing shooters like mason, he's one of the best shooters in the nba..

    The sf position should be our slasher..

    Mason was clearly playing very well for us until the pg experiment..it wasn't a coincidence..
    +1

  18. #18
    Believe. Taking it to the Hole's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    696
    Obviously some people are forgetting all the games Mason won for us this past season with his "boring" shooting. The guy is clutch, he just didn't have a good playoff outing, but he has exceeded my expectations since we acquired him and I think he won't have to carry as much as a load as he did early this past season. He is a shooting guard, people shouldn't expect him to have mad, crazy ball handling skills. geez.

  19. #19
    It is what it is. Mark in Austin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    4,010
    If Pop continues to play him as a backup PG, then by all means trade him. If they play him at his natural position, he's one of the most valuable bench players in the League.

  20. #20
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    This makes me miss poop threads.

  21. #21
    Pop took his brain back. xellos88330's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    6,423
    Mason is a legit SG who's pros outweigh cons IMO, what we need is one more slasher at the 3 who can open the court more to allow Mason more open looks.
    I agree with this whole heartedly. When Mason is on the floor, you need a slasher aside from the PG position. That could really frustrate defenses.

    Not quite sold yet on his defense. Maybe we can see it next year if he remains.

  22. #22
    Veteran thekingrobert's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    1,059
    i miss brent barry

  23. #23
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Post Count
    63
    lol you funny

  24. #24
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    no, not tony allen. i agree with you though. fin and mason are the same type of player so it would be nice if we could throw another type of sg at the other teams defense.

  25. #25
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Once and for all, lets simplify all of the repeating of ideas and thoughts.

    For the Spurs:

    Anyone on the team is open for trade except for Duncan because the goal is to get another ring out of him before he retires in 2012. If the right deal comes along, that puts this team in a better spot to contend the Spurs would look at it.

    The key is to see what makes sense and to recognize that some deals would be more complicated, but that depends on the player (TP would require more for the Spurs to trade him than Mason...)

    Trading for players that help in the future are out because the Spurs are in win now mode. I am not saying the Spurs will only sign vets, but I mean they are not focusing on rebuilding from scratch right now and if a player they sign can help them win now, winning in the future is secondary.

    Making lateral moves is out. Making moves that significantly increase payroll are out unless a rare deal comes along and you get gifted a super star that is worth the money. The FO will not take on a lot more money to make the team a little bit better.

    Look at why both teams would do a deal in the trade. Use logic and the rules and regulations of the CBA.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •