Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 53
  1. #26
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    I'm just making the point, I think the Spurs would be smart and take all factors into consideration (Including Ticket Sales/Merch...etc) before jumping at overpaying.

    If Manu if offered an extension worth more than $8m a year going forward then that means we won the 2010 NBA Championship because he was healthy as !

    Can you imagine this year if they are all healthy and a big man comes in to play a Nazr, Rasho role.

    Before this trade. I would have put Spurs at 10-1 to win it all next year. With this trade, it's closer to 4-1. Once they find a solid big man to round out the rotation, it think it will move closer to 5-2. With Lakers being 3/2 assuming no big moves.
    The Spurs can't extend Manu in 2010 because he'll be a free agent. If they want to extend him it has to be done before October 31st, 2009. I doubt the Spurs want to have to bid on the open market for a healthy Manu, so I think they're going to try and give him that extension this year. One that is structured with limited guarantees based on how many games he plays in.

  2. #27
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    576
    I think you're right. Plus, you have to believe that the best time to get a "good deal" on Manu is now if you are the Spurs.

    At the very least if they don't extend him, Manu, like any player going into a "contract year", will have added incentive to play at the highest level (e.g., Odom and Ariza this past season). That will only bode well for the Spurs during the 2009-10 season.
    No , Manu is not like any other player. This being a contract year has no bearing on how Manu will perform. The fire in Manu burns 100% every time he steps on the court. It is always full speed ahead. The Spurs will always get his best regardless of contract situation or whatever. Manu is one special player and anyone who doesn't recognize that is lost.Unless he is crippled , he will be back.

  3. #28
    Mr. Burns
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    1,929
    Good question. My only issue would be is that the Spurs system is tough enough to work one new impact guy in a key role, much less 2 impact guys.

    The Spurs "car" is not broken and needing an overhaul, just a tune-up.
    I would like to see Brandon Bass as a Spur, if nothing more than just to piss Cuban off more.

    RC should screw with Cuban even if not interested in Bass, float the idea that he's thinking about signing Bass to a deal worth $1.5, Cuban doesn't want Spurs to have him, overpays for Bass, and RC just snickers and goes..."Gotcha Mark"

  4. #29
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    http://hoopshype.com/salaries/la_clippers.htm

    7.6million according to hoopshype. His contract was front-ended.
    Hoopshype isn't reliable. Shamsports is better. Camby's salary for next year is $9.65.

  5. #30
    Mr. Burns
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    1,929
    Good points by all.
    Coyote Geek, I forgot about the timing of an extension and I'm glad you brought that up.

  6. #31
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Good question. My only issue would be is that the Spurs system is tough enough to work one new impact guy in a key role, much less 2 impact guys.

    The Spurs "car" is not broken and needing an overhaul, just a tune-up.
    I would like to see Brandon Bass as a Spur, if nothing more than just to piss Cuban off more.

    RC should screw with Cuban even if not interested in Bass, float the idea that he's thinking about signing Bass to a deal worth $1.5, Cuban doesn't want Spurs to have him, overpays for Bass, and RC just snickers and goes..."Gotcha Mark"
    I wouldn't mind Bass either, but Cuban has made it apparent that he's willing to spend this off-season. The most Spurs could offer is the MLE and I'm sure the Mavs ( in spending mode according to Cuban) would counter and match that offer to bring Bass back. A lot of fans want McDyess, I agree with what you said about McDyess Burns. McDyess stated he did not want to move his family from Detroit and even told Pop and R.C no thank-you whenever the Nuggets bought him out. That said McDyess has a less than 5 percent chance to come to San Antonio. IMO

  7. #32
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Good question. My only issue would be is that the Spurs system is tough enough to work one new impact guy in a key role, much less 2 impact guys.

    The Spurs "car" is not broken and needing an overhaul, just a tune-up.
    I would like to see Brandon Bass as a Spur, if nothing more than just to piss Cuban off more.

    RC should screw with Cuban even if not interested in Bass, float the idea that he's thinking about signing Bass to a deal worth $1.5, Cuban doesn't want Spurs to have him, overpays for Bass, and RC just snickers and goes..."Gotcha Mark"
    Excellent idea. I love it. Cuban is a smart businessman, but he's such a compe ive jerk and an emotional nimrod that he would bite immediately. I just know that he's probably pissing in his pants at the thought of the Spurs getting RJ. He'll make a counter move soon.

  8. #33
    Owned by cats JudynTX's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    12,449

    Ah the magical healing powers of Luis Scola makes Manu more valueable to the tune of an extra $4 mil a year.
    Uh oh you said the L word.

  9. #34
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Good points by all.
    Coyote Geek, I forgot about the timing of an extension and I'm glad you brought that up.
    I didn't mean to sound rude and point out anything Burns. No hard feelings,love the show continue the good work. I listen to you and Andy weekly and I live in Houston. I just wanted to try to make you realize the trade for Jefferson doesn't mean Manu's money is gone that's all.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,971
    All those that believe the Spurs are willing to pay $24m over 2 years to a guy that will be 35 when the season starts, had problems on both ankles, and only play 72% of the games the last 2 years....please shoot me an email.

    I've got some oceanfront property in Arizona I'd like to offer you.
    Where did you come up with the $12 mil #? He is going to make less than he is making now, so his contract would likely start at $7-8 mil per year? After watching RC's video yesterday, he made it sound like Manu will retire a Spur.

  11. #36
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Meh. I'd rather see the Spurs just go out and get the PF/C they need (which Bass isn't) and then what the Mavs do or don't do is irrelevant.

  12. #37
    Veteran to21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,158
    Neaux Tigers!!!

    CWS Game 3:
    Texas- 6 LSU- 3

  13. #38
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Uh oh you said the L word.


    I left the creedo back at "that other place".

  14. #39
    Mr. Burns
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    1,929
    Manu4tres, thanks for the listening to the show, and you are always welcome to call in. Good stuff you countered with today, and it brings up some points that are good fodder for debate.

    Good to know we were live and local this morning, while national shows glossed over the news, and talked about Manny in the Minors and Red Sox/Yanks baseball.

  15. #40
    Veteran to21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,158
    Good question. My only issue would be is that the Spurs system is tough enough to work one new impact guy in a key role, much less 2 impact guys.

    The Spurs "car" is not broken and needing an overhaul, just a tune-up.
    I would like to see Brandon Bass as a Spur, if nothing more than just to piss Cuban off more.

    RC should screw with Cuban even if not interested in Bass, float the idea that he's thinking about signing Bass to a deal worth $1.5, Cuban doesn't want Spurs to have him, overpays for Bass, and RC just snickers and goes..."Gotcha Mark"
    I've always liked Bass, he's a beast.

  16. #41
    Owned by cats JudynTX's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    12,449


    I left the creedo back at "that other place".
    Good times back then.

  17. #42
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Hoopshype isn't reliable. Shamsports is better. Camby's salary for next year is $9.65.
    If Shamsports is right, then you could offer Mason + Bonner + Marcus Williams for Camby and then the Spurs would still have the MLE to go after a bigman( like Sheed, Zaza,Gortat). Or you could go after a lesser quality big man for part of the MLE and go after a two guard like Dahntay Jones, Rashad McCants for the other part of the MLE if Finley were to decline his option.

  18. #43
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    I just assumed it was a "typo" and that I knew that PB meant extension even though he was saying 2010

    By the way PB, my name starts with a J, so if we did a spin off, it could be the PB&J show.

    Then this could be the intro (remixed though):


  19. #44
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    If Shamsports is right, then you could offer Mason + Bonner + Marcus Williams for Camby and then the Spurs would still have the MLE to go after a bigman( like Sheed, Zaza,Gortat) and or a two guard (if Finley declines his option).
    But why would they take that offer? Camby is expiring and so are those other guys. So they gain nothing there.

    They really are not getting talent back that matches Camby, so they lose there.

    Unless somehow they think that Mason is enough at the SG to add depth vs losing the depth at C.

  20. #45
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    If Shamsports is right, then you could offer Mason + Bonner + Marcus Williams for Camby and then the Spurs would still have the MLE to go after a bigman( like Sheed, Zaza,Gortat). Or you could go after a lesser quality big man for part of the MLE and go after a two guard like Dahntay Jones, Rashad McCants for the other part of the MLE if Finley were to decline his option.
    They could offer, but I doubt the Clippers would bite. They can get better value than that.

  21. #46
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    But why would they take that offer? Camby is expiring and so are those other guys. So they gain nothing there.

    They really are not getting talent back that matches Camby, so they lose there.

    Unless somehow they think that Mason is enough at the SG to add depth vs losing the depth at C.
    Clippers were willing to trade Camby for Mike Miller straight up(Miller has an expiring contract). Clippers first offered the Twolves Kaman for Miller and Twolves were more than willing to get the trade done. When that happened Clippers countered with Camby instead and the Twolves then turned their attention to the Wizards deal. That being said, Clippers need two guard help and Mason would provide that and help Eric Gordon out at the two spot. Mason had a better year last year than Miller and they both have expiring contracts. It was also stated by Ric Bucher that Camby was close to being traded to the Thunder for nothing a week ago.

    All that being considered, I believe Mason+ Bonner + Marcus Williams could bring Camby to SA. IMO

  22. #47
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Good times back then.
    Mostly good.

    I'll confess that with the big trade going down yesterday I went to check out SR for the first time in months and discovered that I've been given the stealth ban treatment.

  23. #48
    Owned by cats JudynTX's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    12,449
    Mostly good.

    I'll confess that with the big trade going down yesterday I went to check out SR for the first time in months and discovered that I've been given the stealth ban treatment.
    PMGing you

  24. #49
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    28,298
    Mostly good.

    I'll confess that with the big trade going down yesterday I went to check out SR for the first time in months and discovered that I've been given the stealth ban treatment.
    Sounds about right. You are better off here.

  25. #50
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Sounds about right. You are better off here.


    Agreed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •