Brooks>Kidd
Mcgrady>Howard
Ariza<Marion(but not by much)
Dirk<Scola(but not by much)
Anderson>>>>>Dampier
Rockets bench>Mavs bench
I can see a complaint coming from the Brooks/Kidd thing, but I think Brooks brings more than Kidd right now.
Except for the fact that the Mavs are better at every position, you have a point.
Brooks>Kidd
Mcgrady>Howard
Ariza<Marion(but not by much)
Dirk<Scola(but not by much)
Anderson>>>>>Dampier
Rockets bench>Mavs bench
I can see a complaint coming from the Brooks/Kidd thing, but I think Brooks brings more than Kidd right now.
That's a good point, considering all those dub dubs anderson has put up in the NBA.
You're wrong on all those except for Marion > Ariza. Congrats.
No need to discuss anything further with you. You're ing re ed.Dirk<Scola(but not by much)
Scola is a better rebounder, than Dirk. Dirk is the better scorer which is why I said Dirk is better. Howard is better than McGrady? You can't bet that ing re ed. A warm body is better than Damp.
Same excuse was used for Scola until he proved everyone wrong, and Anderson is just as proven overseas as Scola ever was.
Dirk is a far superior player than Scola. Who the is he? Howard has at least shown he can actually stay on the court, so by default, Howard > McGrady.
Your team sucks, deal with it.
Scola is not a better rebounder than Dirk. Dirk spends the majority of his time on the perimeter, and can't guard anybody good down low, yet is still grabbing double digit rebounds or close every night. He's even capable of monster 15+ board games.
Scola averages more rebounds than Dirk is he IS a better rebounder.
Edit: My bad they average the same amount of rebounds. I was wrong.![]()
So going by your post, you think Scola is a better player?
Dirk spends all his time out on the perimeter and still manages his totals. It's pretty close, regardless.
I was wrong Dirk is a better scorer and they average the same amount of rebounds.![]()
I never said that, I said Dirk was the better player in my original post. I did say Scola was a better rebounder but they average is the same.
Lol@ jt delusions of grandeur
God that guy literally looks like he is mentally challenged.
If they had a top 3 center they would be good to go.
Where's his other roller-skate?
Brooks < Kidd - Aaron is a better scorer, but Kidd is better at everything else.
T-Mac = Howard - If Tracy gets back, like he said, then he's better than Josh
Ariza < Marion - Right now it's still like that. But I gues Trevor will put up better numbers this year.
Scola < Dirk
Andersen = Dampier - We really don't know what will David do. He's still unproven.
Also, the Mavs bench is better.
I hate to say it, but this is how it really is.
T-Mac for 15 games isn't as good as Josh for 60 games.
Sorry Rocket fans, but your team is going to suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. Trevor Ariza was an okay 3 point shooter who averaged like 8 points a game all year. And now you're depending on him being your #1 option for most of the season while T-Mac is hurt?
I foresee an Austin Croshere-like fall for Trevor Ariza. He got hot at the most opportune of times for a couple months, turned that into a nice payday, and will promptly go back to sucking for the rest of his career.
nice assessment. although his 3 point shooting was off the ing charts for that playoff run, i still think he's an average player unless he shows me something this year. he was just a perfect fit in LA's system.
They are right: The Mavs are 1 piece away: A real presence down low. The problem is, just about every team needs another one of those. And yes, the Dwight Howard comment is not that far off the mark: D-How + Dirk and that guard rotation with Carlisle at the helm would be the favorites to win the le.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)