Reply With Quote
Rasheed wasn't the shot blocker Ben was, but Sheed was a great one on one defender. Ben was a very, very good one on one defender though. Don't undersell him. But his weakside defense was great.
Even after putting all this homerism aside, it's just a joke how anyone could rate Ben Wallace higher than Duncan. Wallace used to be good, he may have had a year or two when he was a better helpside-defender than Duncan, but he never was a better one-on-one defender than Duncan. As far as the overall defensive impact goes, there is not even a question that Duncan was the way more valuable player. Don't let all those DPOY-awards fool you: Wallace is a very good defender, but Duncan just always was better than him.
Rasheed wasn't the shot blocker Ben was, but Sheed was a great one on one defender. Ben was a very, very good one on one defender though. Don't undersell him. But his weakside defense was great.
really why is battier so overrated these days? Like the second coming of jesus. I mean hes good, he does research on his opponents, Good player. But really when has he shutdown anyone noteworthy in the POs?
Where is Finley on this list? I saw him get a defensive stop in 2002 with Dallas. Seriously, I saw it.
He has started for the Spurs for years, so he must be an amazing defender. Why else would Pop play him? He can't shoot moe than 42% from the floor anymore.
Its the opinion of ............Kelly Dwyer?!?!? ...
Kelly Dwyer's opinion is equivalent to the opinion of KBP for all I care.
Exactly. I don't need to read his posts that have the exact same thing his sig has. We get it.We all know how you feel by now, stfu about it. but don't worry if the Spurs go down b/c lack of a defensive stopper then we can just bump one of the infinite threads you've posted that cute little emoticon in.
okay? great
Wallace was a solid 1-on-1 defender and he used his strength well, but he wasn't as smart of a defender as Duncan. Wallace was always better off the weak side...Duncan was much better 1 on 1. And Wallace had what, 3 or 4 years as a premier defender??? KG and Duncan have been the best defensive players at their position over the entire course of their respective careers.
Wow. That's a perfect list, with the potential exception of Sheed. Props.
I added up the All-Defensive team appearances by nba players for the past ten years, then gave them 5 points for frist team, 4 points for second team. Here is the list by points:
48 - Kevin Garnett
47 - Tim Duncan
43 - Kobe Bryant
37 - Bruce Bowen
35 - Jason Kidd
29 - Ben Wallace
18 - Marcus Camby
18 - Ron Artest
17 - Doug Christie
16 - Tayshuan Prince
15 - Gary Payton
13 - Andrei Kirilenko
12 - Shaguille O'Neal
9 - Dwight Howard
9 - Dikembe Mutombo
9 - Raja Bell
9 - Chris Paul
8 - Dwayne Wade
8 - Chauncey Billups
8 - Clifford Robinson
8 - Shane Battier
You could find a lot of ways to criticize this rating. But at the end of the day, you have a hard time putting Shane Battier at the top of the list.
It's just mind-boggling that Battier can be put ahead of Duncan or Wallace..he shouldn't even be ahead of Bowen or Artest..
It's Kelly Dwyer's opinion chill out.
Duncan/Garnett are number 1 for me, Wallace is a very close 2nd but he falls off because he fell off the radar in the later stages of the decade.
Other than a few modifications of what the order should have been, the list was pretty good.
Duncan and Bowen should have been ranked higher. I don't think Battier is a better defender than Bowen.
Also, when you count rebounds, offensive rebounds, screens as defense too (which they are) Duncan is #2 on the list and the case can be made for him being #1.
Since the writers on Yahoo don't actually play basketball themselves they don't understand how difficult it is to grab all those rebounds and still produce on offense.
Once Duncan became a Spur, the Spurs always had one of the best FG% allowed defenses. Can't say the same thing for Garnett's career.
B. Wallace was a great help defender, but he was not the 1-1 defender that Duncan is.
Considering this is a 2009 list of the decades top defenders, and Battier rep as a defensive stopper was average at best until that good game he had against Kobe in 2008 when it exploded, makes this list even more of a joke. Nevermind the actual skill and accolades, Battier doesn't have the longevity to make this list. Much less over people who have been doing it for an ACTUAL decade like all those below him. Nevermind his lack of defensive versatility compared to the other players on the list, among other things.
Why do I feel like he's on this list because of an ESPN shot of him studying a kobe bryant notebook during the playoffs.
The joke here is that he WON DPOY
The four-time runner up to DPOY is #7 while KG sits at #1? , Big Ben actually won it four times, and he's #3. If that wasn't bad enough, Kidd is on this list. WTF?
Crap.
Duncan #1
Well, maybe lists like that should serve as a reminder. In about twenty or thirty years, people will look at Ben Wallace and his four DPOY-awards and probably think what a great and unique defender he must have been in the first decade of the 2000s. Probably much like a lot of people that weren't around then to watch any games (includes me, for sure) would look at stats and awards from the 70ies today and come to the same premature conclusions.
Another example are the two MVP-awards Steve Nash got. Don't get me wrong, I like Nash as a player, but he is only really great when the team he is on suits his style of playing the way the Suns did a couple of years ago. When you look at his consecutive MVP-honors, you could get the impression he has to be one of the best PGs of all time, which he most certainly is not. In my opinion, Jason Kidd, for example, is a much better and especially much more versatile PG, but he never did get an MVP-award.
Jason Kidd was a much better defender than some are giving him credit for. He had the quickness to stay in front of smaller guards and the strength to body up bigger ones. And he could get some steals too.
Kidd never won MVP but people felt he should have in 2003. Of course, Duncan won it and then proceeded to destroy the Nets almost singlehandedly.
Ten years would take us back to 1999. DRob?
This list is pretty weak.
1999 was part of the 90s decade. The column is talking about this decade, the one that started in 2000 and ends this year since the new decade starts in 2010 (the teens decade).
Bowen should be no less than 4 and Duncan no less than 2
Camby certainly did not deserve it that year. That list is a joke as well as CAmby winning the DPOY.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
