Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 127
  1. #101
    RIP whottt. slayermin's Avatar
    Post Count
    5,011




    Two more to consider.

  2. #102
    Montana all time...hands down.

  3. #103
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    Otto Graham.

  4. #104
    you are a faggot Phillip's Avatar
    My Team
    Kansas City Chiefs
    Post Count
    5,774




    Two more to consider.
    No and no.

    The only three to consider is Manning, Brady, and Montana. And I think Manning and Brady both surpassed Montana, who benefited greatly from playing in an era where heavy passing had just started to take the league by storm, a system that no one had seen before (west coast offense), and great weapons such as Rice, Taylor, and more. Most teams were still geared to stop the run more than anything. Remember the 85 Bears? Hard-nosed, smash mouth defense, that suffered their only loss to a Dolphins team that utilized a heavy passing, spread attack... something they hadn't seen much of all year.

    Manning and Brady both have been able to be successful in multiple systems.

    Plus, are you really going to tell me that Brady and Manning couldn't have done what Montana did? Going back and forth between letting Rathman pound the out of their opponent, and throwing short, accurate, timed passes to guys like Jerry Rice?

    Please.

  5. #105
    I'm the greatest kamikazi_player's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    3,545
    No and no.

    The only three to consider is Manning, Brady, and Montana. And I think Manning and Brady both surpassed Montana, who benefited greatly from playing in an era where heavy passing had just started to take the league by storm, a system that no one had seen before (west coast offense), and great weapons such as Rice, Taylor, and more. Most teams were still geared to stop the run more than anything. Remember the 85 Bears? Hard-nosed, smash mouth defense, that suffered their only loss to a Dolphins team that utilized a heavy passing, spread attack... something they hadn't seen much of all year.

    Manning and Brady both have been able to be successful in multiple systems.

    Plus, are you really going to tell me that Brady and Manning couldn't have done what Montana did? Going back and forth between letting Rathman pound the out of their opponent, and throwing short, accurate, timed passes to guys like Jerry Rice?

    Please.
    Uhhh..no. Maybe par with Montana, at least for Brady, but Manning is not that far behind.

  6. #106
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    14,577
    do we all agree that the Vikings are the best team in the NFL?

  7. #107
    you are a faggot Phillip's Avatar
    My Team
    Kansas City Chiefs
    Post Count
    5,774
    Uhhh..no. Maybe par with Montana, at least for Brady, but Manning is not that far behind.
    You have got to be kidding.

    Enough with all the Montana knob-slobbing in here.

    , Dan Marino, Warren Moon, Rich Gannon, or Jim Kelly probably all could have done as good of a job as Montana. There are probably at least 10 other precise passers that could have done his job and won rings with that team, that system, at that time in history. The guy was fantastic, no question. But he benefited from a great system and great timing more than any QB ever has. Stick him in today's NFL with a west coast offense, he wouldn't do nearly as much. Back then, the west coast was something no one had really seen. While still effective today, its not nearly as great or beneficial as it was in the 80s.

  8. #108
    Veteran mojorizen7's Avatar
    My Team
    St. Louis Rams
    Post Count
    1,841
    You are criticizing the wrong thing. Its not the WC that needs to go, its Chad Pennington who can barely stretch the field.
    Exactly, put a QB who can make a play downfield at all in there and MIAMI has a legit chance to pull that game out.
    CP did make a perfect pass to Ginn who choked but still......
    Pennington reminds me of Marc Bulger....a guy who's accurate,can manage a game for you, but can't necessarily make plays with his arm or feet.
    MIAMI needs some more team speed and a better QB.

    INDY needs to name their next dome after Peyton Manning. The dude was ing brilliant and said to MIAMI's 45:00 time of possession...well, see my sig below basically.

  9. #109
    RIP whottt. slayermin's Avatar
    Post Count
    5,011
    No and no.

    The only three to consider is Manning, Brady, and Montana. And I think Manning and Brady both surpassed Montana, who benefited greatly from playing in an era where heavy passing had just started to take the league by storm, a system that no one had seen before (west coast offense), and great weapons such as Rice, Taylor, and more. Most teams were still geared to stop the run more than anything. Remember the 85 Bears? Hard-nosed, smash mouth defense, that suffered their only loss to a Dolphins team that utilized a heavy passing, spread attack... something they hadn't seen much of all year.

    Manning and Brady both have been able to be successful in multiple systems.

    Plus, are you really going to tell me that Brady and Manning couldn't have done what Montana did? Going back and forth between letting Rathman pound the out of their opponent, and throwing short, accurate, timed passes to guys like Jerry Rice?

    Please.
    Dan Marino, Steve Young, and Johnny Unitas are in the argument.

    Defenses have evolved but we are talking different eras. QB's are much more protected than in the past. I want a QB that was able to excel when the game was much more violent for his position.

    In my humble opinion, the greatest pure passer was Dan Marino. Steve Young was the greatest statistical quarterback ever, and you throw in his running ability and Super Bowl ring, and he deserves much more respect than he gets.

    And if you don't know anything about Johnny Unitas and you love football, read a biography about him. To me, I don't know how you can talk about the greatest quarterbacks of all time and not have him in your discussion.

    Maybe Brady and Montana could rival Johnny U in clutch situations but they were no way his equal as a football player. You want to talk about a golden arm? Strategist? Toughness? Winner?

  10. #110
    you are a faggot Phillip's Avatar
    My Team
    Kansas City Chiefs
    Post Count
    5,774
    Dan Marino, Steve Young, and Johnny Unitas are in the argument.

    Defenses have evolved but we are talking different eras. QB's are much more protected than in the past. I want a QB that was able to excel when the game was much more violent for his position.

    In my humble opinion, the greatest pure passer was Dan Marino. Steve Young was the greatest statistical quarterback ever, and you throw in his running ability and Super Bowl ring, and he deserves much more respect than he gets.

    And if you don't know anything about Johnny Unitas and you love football, read a biography about him. To me, I don't know how you can talk about the greatest quarterbacks of all time and not have him in your discussion.

    Maybe Brady and Montana could rival Johnny U in clutch situations but they were no way his equal as a football player. You want to talk about a golden arm? Strategist? Toughness? Winner?

  11. #111
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    24,173
    opinions, assholes, and such.

  12. #112
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    24,173
    Wayne > Harrison
    That's not the point.

  13. #113
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    24,173
    btw, Young isn't even close to guys like Manning and Brady.

  14. #114
    Che cazzo stai dicendo? DisgruntledLionFan#54,927's Avatar
    Post Count
    7,801
    Rathman, Rice and Taylor weren't on either the '81 or '84 SB teams.

    And if new means a system that the NFL had seen for almost a decade before the 9ers won their 1st SB, then you have a point.

    Kenny Anderson ran Walsh's WCO in the mid-70s.

  15. #115
    hope and change
    Post Count
    5,749
    QB's today are better than they were even 10 years ago, the entire game of football is evolving and improving in every area.

    Manning > Montana

    in today's NFL, Montana would be like Tony Romo

    and yeah, I really just said that

  16. #116
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Oakland Raiders
    Post Count
    17,070
    That's not the point.
    Ward > Wayne

    Wayne > Harrison

    Ward > Harrison

  17. #117
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Oakland Raiders
    Post Count
    17,070
    Rathman, Rice and Taylor weren't on either the '81 or '84 SB teams.

    And if new means a system that the NFL had seen for almost a decade before the 9ers won their 1st SB, then you have a point.

    Kenny Anderson ran Walsh's WCO in the mid-70s.
    The system hadn't been perfected the way it had by time that Montana came around. At first, it was clearly something the league wasn't used to dealing with. Then as the league started to come around a bit more, the 49ers added tools such as Craig, Rice, and Rathman. Come on now.

  18. #118
    Che cazzo stai dicendo? DisgruntledLionFan#54,927's Avatar
    Post Count
    7,801
    You're basically saying that guys like Parcells, Buddy Ryan and Belichik needed 5+ years to figure out how to stop this offense. And that's with game film from Stanford, SD, Cincy and the first two years in SF.

    By chance do you think it was perfected in SF because of Joe Montana?

    Regardless, the guy was a stone cold killer in those SBs. Accounted for 13 TDs, no turnovers and completed close to 70% of his passes.

    Plus, he took KC to the AFCCG with a washed up Allen and guys like JJ Birden and Keith Cash as his WRs. At 37 years old.

    As great as Manning is, he has to win another SB to even get in the conversation in my eyes.

    Johnny U? Never saw him play so it's tough to gauge.

  19. #119
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Oakland Raiders
    Post Count
    17,070
    You're basically saying that guys like Parcells, Buddy Ryan and Belichik needed 5+ years to figure out how to stop this offense. And that's with game film from Stanford, SD, Cincy and the first two years in SF.
    And Walsh was also making adjustments as time went on. Fact is, a lot of it was also personnel based. Most teams weren't built to handle such heavy passing offenses.

    By chance do you think it was perfected in SF because of Joe Montana?
    No question about it. But it was also perfect for him. I don't see him being able to run a complex and complete passing system like Peyton Manning runs, also calling plays and basically running the entire offense by himself.

    Regardless, the guy was a stone cold killer in those SBs. Accounted for 13 TDs, no turnovers and completed close to 70% of his passes.
    Yeah, he was fantastic.

    Plus, he took KC to the AFCCG with a washed up Allen and guys like JJ Birden and Keith Cash as his WRs. At 37 years old.
    In a weak AFC.

    As great as Manning is, he has to win another SB to even get in the conversation in my eyes.
    What more can the guy do? Block for himself, because his offensive line has major holes? Catch his own passes because anyone other than Reggie Wayne suddenly unlearns how to catch passes and run routes? Stop the run on defense? The guy has done everything he could do. Winning SB's is a TEAM accomplishment.

    Johnny U? Never saw him play so it's tough to gauge.
    Eh, only old fogies that can't accept the fact that predecessors will eventually be surpassed think he's in the discussion.

  20. #120
    Che cazzo stai dicendo? DisgruntledLionFan#54,927's Avatar
    Post Count
    7,801
    I have no idea if he could or couldn't run another offense. No one does. They say he was one of the smartest QBs to ever play the game so I'd give him the benefit of the doubt if I was forced to make a decision.

    The guy just had an uncanny knack for making the big play in the biggest moments of the biggest games.

    He's my clear #1 and Manning #2. I don't see that changing for the time being.

  21. #121
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    15,826
    it's just the younger generation doesn't respect the generation previous as much as they should. I personally think 70's football is way overrated, because I grew up watching football in the 80's and 90's. I'm convinced the 90's Cowboys & 80's 49ers would absolutely destroy the 70's Steelers, even though probably nobody who grew up watching 70's football would think that.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •