Massachusetts statutory rape laws are very simple. If you engage in sexual relations with a person who is younger than 18 years old, and you are 18 years old or older, you are violating the law.
http://blog.laborlawtalk.com/2006/10...ory-rape-laws/
Chapter 272: Section 4. Inducing person under 18 to have sexual intercourse.
Section 4. Whoever induces any person under eighteen of chaste life to have unlawful sexual intercourse shall be punished as provided in the preceding section.
Even he thought what he did was wrong and should have informed the police.
Cheerleaders.Jennings said: "Twenty one years later I can see how I should have handled this situation differently. I should have asked for more information and consulted legal or medical authorities."
Why are you moving the goalposts again?
At the president's pleasure
A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sop re that he was having sexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar." It's getting hard to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down.
In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship.
According to Mr. Jennings' own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the "older man" in a "bus station bathroom" and was taken to the older man's home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape "unethical." Mr. Jennings' defenders asserted that there was no evidence that he was aware the student had sex with the older man.
However, the new audiotape contradicts this claim. In 2000, Mr. Jennings gave a talk to the Iowa chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, an advocacy group that promotes sexuality in schools. On the tape, Mr. Jennings recollected that he told the student to make sure "to use a condom" when he was with the older man. That he actively encouraged the relationship is reinforced by Mr. Jennings' own description in his 1994 book, "One Teacher in 10." In that account, the teacher boasts how he allayed the student's concerns about the relationship to such a degree that the 15-year-old "left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ents-pleasure/
You're ing disgusting.trying to rationalize this .
So he should have gone to the police about something that wasn't a crime?
Cheerleader.
So where is the direct quote saying he knew the kid was 15.
The only direct quote we have so far is from the former child saying he wasn't 15.
I'm fine with condemning him if he broke the law. You haven't proved that he broke any law yet.
I'm trying to determine whether any law was broken here.
You already proved that made up bull can be repeated. I want to know if the child's age was made up bull .
Keep plugging your ears yelling lah lah lah cheerleader.
Any time you see a source you don't like you just try and pretend it's not relevant, but at least it help everyone see what lengths obamatrons will go to in order to protect big brother's divinity.
No, I actually check out the source and the veracity of its claims.
I'm sorry yours turned out to be complete bull , micca, but you should really be more wary of immigration articles written by online bookkeepers.
None of the sources give a direct quote from Jennings saying the kid was 15. The only direct quote we have is from the former teen saying he wasn't 15.
SpursNCowboys,
The age of consent in Massachusetts is 16.
http://www.lawlib.state.ma.us/subject/about/sex.html
The law you quoted is the only one listed as under 18 instead of 16.Whoever unlawfully has sexual intercourse or unnatural sexual intercourse, and abuses a child under 16 years of age, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for life or for any term of years or, except as otherwise provided, for any term in a jail or house of correction. A prosecution commenced under this section shall neither be continued without a finding nor placed on file.
However, the article specifically states that only 1 case has ever been prosecuted on the above law, where it states a man directly asked a boy money for fellatio.Whoever induces any person under 18 years of age of chaste life to have unlawful sexual intercourse shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years or in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Jennings did not "induce" this child to have sex. He may have affirmed it, agreed with it, or any number of things, but he wasn't trying to actively convince this child to have sex when he didn't want it.
Here's a handy map for you guys too:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...of_Consent.png
You mean "Nina" who has written only about sex crimes for the past two years on a blog apparently about labor law is full of ?
And you found this out by checking sources and the veracity of their claims?
Shame on you.
YOU LIE prove it what source and prove it was a lie.
I asked for a direct quote from Jennings saying the kid was 15.
You don't have one.
The age of consent has been clearly established, and "Nina" has been proven wrong.
Hope,
You're asking ChumpDumper to prove YOUR claim that he was 15?
Peace brothers....Let cowboy and me have our point of view and Chimp and Lngrr. My fondest hope for you Lngrr is that if your 15 or16 year old son wants to have sex with a 30 year old sexual predator in the stalls of public restrooms that they're plenty around for him to find.For you Chimp I hope they finally except you into nambla.... I think you'd make an excellent poster boy.
You have to choose for yourself what's right or wrong in the end you do what you do.
No your side stepping the issue, your allegation to me was about facts concerning illegal aliens not jennings, again YOU LIE>Prove it.
I did it in the other thread. It's buried under your cut and paste meltdown.
I provided a link and everything, dummy.
I asked for a direct quote from Jennings saying he thought the kid was 15. You couldn't, so you got mad and melted down and tried to change the subject to the subject you tried to change from in the other thread after you melted down there.
Those were facts compiled by Numbers USA prove which are wrong let's see them.prove they're wrong you didn't provide anything prove it.
You LIe againI asked for a direct quote from Jennings saying he thought the kid was 15. You couldn't, so you got mad and melted down and tried to change the subject to the subject you tried to change from in the other thread after you melted down there.
I didn't say anything about those.
I was talking about your online bookkeeper's blog.
You're an idiot.
No, your meltdowns are well recorded.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote