Chris Broussard: More SJax rumors

[EricB]

When you look at Jackson, you see some big shots in 2003 and against Mavs in 2007.

When I look at Jackson, I see also all the inconsistency on and off the court. For example, just after being great with Mavs, he was horrible against Utah. His FG% was 28% in that series.

And not caring about 2012-2013 is quite irresponsible.

Lottery team.

Who gives a .

[DAF86]

Scroll up to post 95.

What happens when one of them gets injured for some games?

[yavozerb]

THIS IS NOT GONNA HAPPEN ..that is all

[Bruno]

Lottery team.

Who gives a .

San Antonio is a so big market and the owner is so rich that it doesn't matter at all to have an ugly team with a high payroll....

[EricB]

THIS IS NOT GONNA HAPPEN ..that is all

According to?

[Bruno]

Throwing contracts out of the equation Jack can help us win a championship over the next 2 to 3 years more than foster.

Well, if you throw contracts away of the equation, you left the real world.

[celldweller]

THIS IS NOT GONNA HAPPEN ..that is all

I think down deep inside they all know it.

But if it did.........Look Out!!!

[EricB]

San Antonio is a so big market and the owner is so rich that it doesn't matter at all to have an ugly team with a high payroll....

Lottery team.

Players like him will be dumped.

You need to enter the reality world.

[DAF86]

And our frontcourt wouldn'y get thin by trading both bonner and mahinmi..let this trade go, seriously..

Who said anything about trading Mahinmi? and Jackson is more of a frontcourt player than Bonner.

[Bruno]

Lottery team.

Players like him will be dumped.

You need to enter the reality world.

Sure, it's so easy to dump a bad contract.

And you're talking about reality world...

[Dro210]

Please refer to the sig....


Also... Jack's contract is not bad at all. ~$8 mil for a guy of his caliber is not near a bad contract. If you want to see a bad contract, look no further than our boy Richard Jefferson... and I don't see too many people complaining about that one right now.

[Bruno]

One of the things the Spurs front office is best at is moving bad contracts. Rasho, Rose, Butler etc.

They just give up 2 first round pick and Scola to move Rose and Butler.

[EricB]

Sure, it's so easy to dump a bad contract.

And you're talking about reality world...

It is.

Richard Jefferson
Malik Rose
Rasho
Butler


how many more examples do you need?

[Mel_13]

One of the things the Spurs front office is best at is moving bad contracts. Rasho, Rose, Butler etc.

Only Rasho was moved without giving up valuable assets. Moving Rose cost two 1st rounders and moving Butler cost Scola's rights.

[EricB]

They just give up 2 first round pick and Scola to move Rose and Butler.

They got back Matt Bonner draft picks for Rasho.

[MaNu4Tres]

San Antonio is a so big market and the owner is so rich that it doesn't matter at all to have an ugly team with a high payroll....

You act as if Jackson has 8 years left on his deal.

These next two years doesn't really matter because we will have a high payroll and will be over the luxury tax regardless of getting Jackson or not and we will be a championship team. So we won't be an ugly team with a high payroll, that is the REAL WORLD.

The last 2 years Spurs only have 29 million on the books for the 2011/ 2012 season, which will be Duncan's last year. If Spurs are in rebuilding mode I'm sure Spurs can trade Jackson to a contender at that time for an expiring and a contract of a young prospect for 2-4 million along with a pick. I'm pretty sure R.C could pull that off if he can convince people to take on the contracts of Rasho and Malik.

[Bruno]

They got back Matt Bonner draft picks for Rasho.

Finding twice a GM as dumb as Colangelo won't be that easy.

[EricB]

Finding twice a GM as dumb as Colangelo won't be that easy.

For a team wanting cap space the following year why not?

[DJB]

If we could send out Mason/ Finley( the only way I see us trading him is if its set up to where he comes back in 30 days/ and Mahimni for Jackson. It would improve our chances at number 5 immensely. I'd even throw in a 1st round pick.

Losing too much depth on the perimeter.

[MaNu4Tres]

Losing too much depth on the perimeter.

Refer to post 95.

[MaNu4Tres]

Finding twice a GM as dumb as Colangelo won't be that easy.

Jackson is 10 times the player Rasho is for similiar money. It should be easier.

[DAF86]

Refer to post 95.

Refer to post 106.

[Bruno]

Scola was a mistake but Butler needed to be traded away. The Rose trade helped us win a championship. The Spurs only have Tim Duncan for a little while longer, Jacks long term contract would be worth a championship.

Adding Jackson doesn't guarantee a championship.

[baseline bum]

When you look at Jackson, you see some big shots in 2003 and against Mavs in 2007.

When I look at Jackson, I see also all the inconsistency on and off the court. For example, just after being great with Mavs, he was horrible against Utah. His FG% was 28% in that series.

And not caring about 2012-2013 is quite irresponsible.

In 2012-13, assuming Tim retires, I want this team going into the lottery. You can't win without franchise players, and being in the lottery is by far the Spurs best shot to do that. There's no way the Spurs are going to be able to follow the Lakers model and pluck a Shaq from a small-market team and trades are only going to get you players with issues. Exactly one team in the last 30 years has won without a first-ballot HOF superstar lead player. Being stuck in mediocrity is the worst possible outcome for this team after Duncan retires.

[DAF86]

I say, if you planned to go balls out to get a championship this or next season then go really balls out to make that happen.