because Pop can't be trusted (#1), and Finley is washed up (#2). If Pop uses him as the locker room/end of the bench guy he is, there's no problem.
He's a Pop favorite, and everyone seems to like him. Unless we get burned because of his salary ...
well last year, we didn't really have that much option at SF, and M. Finley was arguably our best SF in Pop's eye since the only other option was B. Bowen and I. Udoka; and from what i've seen from the play of the latter 2, Pop made the right choice in giving M. Finley the minutes.
because Pop can't be trusted (#1), and Finley is washed up (#2). If Pop uses him as the locker room/end of the bench guy he is, there's no problem.
He's a Pop favorite, and everyone seems to like him. Unless we get burned because of his salary ...
If we can get Bowen back, I would love this roster even more:
T. Parker / G. Hill / J. Mclinton
R. Mason / M. Ginobili / M. Hairston
R. Jefferson / Bruce Bowen/ M. Finley / J. Gist
R. Wallace / D. Blair / M. Bonner
T. Duncan / I. Mahnimi
That is a 15-man roster right there.. The players on IR would probably be Hairston, Gist, and Mclinton or someone else. Besides, you can change the IR from day to day so...I would be fine with this roster right here. , even put Fin on IR and just let him be a voice in the locker room.
you think age caught up with Bowen . . . but hasn't caught up with Finley?
strong white knight
well i'm sure it caught up with M. Finley a long time ago, since now he's just restrictedly a spot up shooter. M. Finley still got one of the sweetest J on the team, and age can't catch up with the way the man shoots. While B. Bowen is a defensive stopper, so age will affect his game more since he need the speed and quickness to guard the perimeter players out there.
so you are saying that B. Diaw is also a better shooter than R. Allen since if you want to talk statistics, B. Diaw also shot better from the 3pt line than R. Allen did last year. If you watch basketball, you know M. Finley as a jump shooter >>>>>>>>> B. Bowen as a jump shooter.
This is becoming an annual event.
1. timvp gets mad that Finley is returning.
2. ST posters say that Finley will only get spot minutes and play a small role.
3. timvp says Pop will find a way to play Finley too much.
4. Pop finds a way to play Finley too much.
5. Rinse repeat for the next season.
6. The "true fans" suck Pop's and wait for his mysterious tactics to pan out
The world may never know.....
finley is not playing too much, just 20MPG and it will get down when Manu and RJ will get in the groove, right now Finley getting 20MPG cause he is better option than Mason. Finley has only one bad game and there you jumping, calm down!
Talk in another 15-20 games. Its only the 4th game....geez.
Only one? What games have you been watching?
We're ed man. Its official that Fin has pictures of Pop ing Rasho in the broom closet or something close to that because this is just ed up. There's no ing need to play Finley.
WHAT
THE
Mason should start and take most if not all of finley's minutes.
I've given up on a sensible role for Finley. I hate that Pop's Finley love has now fully carried over to Bonner's ass though.
there's still time, isn't there?..probably not..
I've officially gone numb when it comes to Fin and Bonner.
I sit in front of my computer and read plenty of logical posts that I agree with and some that are absolutely ridiculous and, yet, I just can't bring myself to go any more in depth on the topic.
I'm done with these two.
I'm washing my hands of the filth that is their starting roles.
The sad thing is, I don't really have a problem with either of them individually. They're both quality people and professionals that could be an asset to most any team given the proper role and minutes. It's not their fault Pop utilizes them the way he does, right? (incriminating photos and affairs are only speculation -- logical, but speculation -- at this point)
So that's it. I'm done trying to convince myself or this board of the misguided approach Pop's taken with the two; I will no longer allow it suck my will to live.
So in the words of the immortal B. Bowen:
It is what it is..
We should all pitch in some $ to hire the best PI to dig some dirt and figure out what's going on..the sad part is that I'm not joking in any way..it would actually be the only way to figure this out, we deserve to know..
Damn, did the bump finally put Finley starting to bed?
![]()
As if Bogans is any better? What the is wrong with Pop? Bogans may sound like Bowen but its not the ing same. Should have ing kept Bowen if this is the plan.
Unless Bogans has a bad game..
Agree that Bowen > Bogans. But at this point, I'd say Bogans > Finley.
Baby step, I guess.
Its too bad Bogans is beyond ing offensively. He makes Bruce look like ing Lebron James offensively.
I would like to see us just run with Mason or even Hairston in the starting lineup at the 2 for a while.
I feel very confident in saying Malik would be better than Bogans or Finley.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)