Hey, have you missed this post?
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...&postcount=205
In case you didnt understand my subsequent posts. I clarified the original by not counting the role players. Surely you can grasp that.
Hey, have you missed this post?
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...&postcount=205
Your mommy's love for my wood is good enough for me. Thanks for caring.
I concede your ignorance.Well it is good to know that you can concede defeat.
Aww, that's cute.Now you sound like poor Kate.
None of the Above. Next please.So a simple yes or no question isn't clear enough for you now? Let's try this then.
1. Not denying something is an admission of guilt.
A. True
B. False
C. Elephant
D. Run
There was nothing angelic about what your mom and I did last night.If she has to listen to you talk then I'd say she is more of a Saint.
I'm still here. Bring some proof with you next time.Ah, but of course you run as fast as you can away from the facts.
When you are actually able to address what I am saying we will have a debate.
when you can actually provide proof rather than just opinion we'll have a debate.
But the poster to whom I replied didn't. And LOL at considering all those guys role-players. Guys that made multiple All-Star appearances, All-NBA teams and were elected to the 50 greatest players in history.
In any case, that's beyond the point. I just want to know what was exactly your problem with my reply.
Geez, this is too much! You're backing out of an other bet?!??!?!? It's like what, the 4th one this week? One you've just proposed?!?!? Like 2 minutes ago!??!!?
You either have serious problems or you're just trolling.
What bet have I proposed that I have turned down?
Here is my bet, do you accept? YES or NO.
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...&postcount=215
The one on the Lakers record on close games going down! Just read the post above! I said the Lakers record on close games will go down and your emphatic and triumphant answer was, and I quote:
Excellent! I've been waiting for you to say this.
So, I said it. The Lakers record in close games will go down - significantly. I'll repeat it as many times as you wish.
If I'm wrong - as implied by your "Excellent! I've been waiting for you to say this" - just take the damn bet. I know it goes against your tradition here, but it's time for you to man up and stood for your own words.
When did I say that all Europeans are pieces of ? I said that YOU are a European piece of . Which you are. You really need to brush up on your English KBP Jr. Using your logic, I guess you are racist against Chinese people.
Don't be stupid. You're editing my quote and leaving stuff out. Was this on accident? Pathetic
Sorry pal, I'm just not interested on engaging in conversations with racists that use nothing but ad hominem arguments.
Ah, but clearly it's not b/c otherwise you wouldn't be trying so hard.
A guy hanging his hat on a misquoted wiki article wants to bring up ignorance? lol To funny.
Don't worry Kobe respects you enough to not blast on your face.
Maybe you should just tell me how stupid do I have to dumb down the question before you will have the ability to answer it?
No, really if you talk like you post she has to be a Saint.
"Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for."
I know you are a little slow and so I posted it a few times in hopes that you will be able to catch it this time.
You were saying?
Couldn't think of a comeback I see.You lose son.
What? Let's clarify some stuff?
Look, here's the only thing I said that you quoted in your post proposing the bet:
Some questions:It only means that you should expect the Lakers winning record in close games to go down.
a) That was all, correct? That was the only thing I said you quoted? b) That's the thing that you've been waiting for me to say, correct? c) You quoted that sentence because you disagree with me, right?
Hey now, don't go asking him to do something crazy like stand behind what he said.
I have to try hard to get up for your mom. She is fat and ugly. But as soon as she starts sucking; I don't need to try anymore.
A guy hanging on to his own opinion with no quotes at all wants to laugh? Too funny.A guy hanging his hat on a misquoted wiki article wants to bring up ignorance? lol To funny.
Oh, I'll blast your mom in the face alright.Don't worry Kobe respects you enough to not blast on your face.
Oh, you're already more than stupid enough. Thanks.Maybe you should just tell me how stupid do I have to dumb down the question before you will have the ability to answer it?
Oh no, she likes it dirty. Your mom wouldn't have it any other way; filthy ho.No, really if you talk like you post she has to be a Saint.
Maybe if you say it real fast you can get a gold star."Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for."
Post it a couple more times, maybe you'll convince yourself.I know you are a little slow and so I posted it a few times in hopes that you will be able to catch it this time.
Yes, I was saying Kobe is innocent.You were saying?
you know what i ing hate, when someone calls a phobe a racist. Yeah phobes are bad, but gay ain't a race
Not at all. I agree with your statement because it was exactly correct. I was waiting for you to say it.
And then I added my own clarification which you conveniently didn't quote:
"Please let me know when that record goes down considerably. Until then, your graph is useless."
Is this correct? Do you agree or disagree?
Does this contradict anything you are saying?
What a sorry excuse. I said it as early as in my first post in this thread.
I obviously disagree. The graph isn't useless. The point of the graph is to prove the weak correlation between the quality of the team and the winning record in close games.
I'm not exactly sure what you are contesting. You probably don't know what correlation is or something.
What is the "this" that contradicts what I'm saying?
Yeah yeah yeah we get it already. Maybe you can move onto something that might actually bother me if you are going to continue down this path?
When your quotes come from a hack site with citations that contradict the very statement you are citing, yes I will laugh loud and hard.
And yet you still lack the ability to answer the question.
Definitely a Saint.
I hate seeing you having to put your head in the sand as your house of cards continues to keep tumbling down.
Don't worry you have convinced me about seven pages ago.
It is almost sad seeing you so completely defeated that you don't even try anymore. Your complete submission is starting to make me feel like a rapist.![]()
I have to go. I'll leave with you with a question:
What's more emblematic of the typical Lakers fan?
a) Cobbler's thesis that John Havlicek, a Finals MVP, 13 times All-Star, 11 All-NBA teams, 8 All-NBA Defensive teams, 8 rings, 26000 career points, 8000 rebounds and 6000 assists, and the best player in some championship teams was.... a role-player. Hondo was a role-player... Jesus...
b) Allanon's thesis that we should disregard the testimony of women victim of rape that have had psychiatric treatment.
Why are you such a liar? Here is your first post in this thread:
Ok, let's move past your being a liar. Look here at your statement I disagree with.
The point of the graph is to prove the weak correlation between the quality of the team and the winning record in close games.I quoted my disagreement with you right above you wondering what I'm contesting.I'm not exactly sure what you are contesting.
So using this; let's make a bet.
1. You say there is a "weak correlation between the quality of the team and the winning record in close games."
2. I say the Lakers quality will disprove this graphed correlation.
Do you disagree? If you disagree, what % does the graph say the Lakers will win in close games?
The Bet is:
Whatever % the graph says the Lakers will win in close games, I will take Over, you take UNDER.
Loser puts what the winner wants in loser's sig.
Do you accept this SIG bet?
Last edited by Allanon; 11-08-2009 at 01:39 AM.
Hypocrisy in 3...2...1....
-------------------------------------------------
Hypocrisy pt. 2
Right now you're looking like a total loser
This is beyond pathetic, even for a Lakers fan.Bloody ignorant kidscan make even the regular re ed Lakers fan embarrassed.
You lose .
I like talking about your mom giving me head. I'm glad you don't have a problem with it.
You will laugh loud and hard while continuing to not provide any contradictory information. I laugh loud and hard as well. Ho Ho Ho.When your quotes come from a hack site with citations that contradict the very statement you are citing, yes I will laugh loud and hard.
And you still lack the ability to ask a question.And yet you still lack the ability to answer the question.
Hey, I'm not trying to change your opinion of your mom. I'm just stating that with me, she's a filthy ho...no holes not explored; if yah know what I mean.Definitely a Saint.
Hey, I'm happy as long as you're along for the rideI hate seeing you having to put your head in the sand as your house of cards continues to keep tumbling down.
Good for you.Don't worry you have convinced me about seven pages ago.
Hahah, I'm still here waiting for you to come up with something other than opinion.It is almost sad seeing you so completely defeated that you don't even try anymore. Your complete submission is starting to make me feel like a rapist.![]()
![]()
Moses Malone.
You are twisting words again because that is what you do. I never mentioned Hondo specifically. I said there are a lot of role players for those Celtic teams that had 8 rings. Certainly Heinsohn was. Certainly KC Jones was. Certainly Tom Sanders was. That's 3 of the 4 that have 8 you imbecile.
I even explained to you that I was talking (about ring total) in reference to the 1 to 10 top players all time when its said and done. You have MJ in the talk, you have Russell, Kareem, Wilt, Bird, Magic etc. And of that "elite" group it is not inconcievable that Kobe could end up as the original poster said, with the 2nd highest ring total.
Certainly Hondo was a great player but not even a moron like you would put him in the top 10 or 20.
But you fail to see any logical points and only twist comments and put words into peoples mouths because... well... that's who you are.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)