So DPG, regardless of the fact this whole argument was for nothing, you don't think this is a reasonable explanation:
In 2007, Gilbert Arenas sees Sean Taylor is killed by home invaders. He panics, acts on impulse without really thinking about the responsibilities of owning guns and what precautionary measures to take, and goes out and get 4 guns to keep by his bed and around the house in the event of a home invasion. 2 years later, one of his kids is big enough to get to where he has one of the guns. He sees one of his kids gets to a gun, never having thought about that possibility before, so like he had done in the past, he panics and acts on impulse as someone with zero education about being a gun owner (or a gun owner in the NBA), bringing all 4 guns to the arena without having thought about NBA rules against that or alternatively just buying a safe. As someone who has no idea about the seriousness involving guns, he thinks this is some stupid thing he can joke about and the worst that will happen is a slap on the wrist.
IMO, this situation makes perfect sense, it's someone who repeatedly acts impulsively and never thinks about the consequences of his actions.

Reply With Quote
