Reply With Quote
Too late now. Sign him to Bogan's contract next year and tell Bogan's see ya!
http://www.nba.com/kings/news/press_...010_02_23.html
reportedly the Bobcats are interested in signing him.
problem is, he is injured again. (out for 3-4 more weeks)
Hughes for 13 million wasn't a good deal obviously.
for the min he would be worth a thought. I mean, we start Bogans, don't we.
Too late now. Sign him to Bogan's contract next year and tell Bogan's see ya!
No reason for the FO to waste more money. They have Malik Hairston. Sometimes I don't understand where you guys come up with this stuff. Our problem is having an undersized center and a bust for a small forward. Lets fill at those spots first before we add anything else....
We have TP, Manu, Hill in the backcourt. Why the f@(!* would we need Allen Iverson, Larry Hughes or any other guard you can think off.. We don't need guards. We need size!
Larry Hughes at PF. Do it Pop. Do it!
Larry Hughes isn't much better than the spares we have now...no thanks.
I try it again:
Spurs start Keith Bogans at SG. and not because 3 of our guards are injured. in fact all our guards are healthy. any team that starts Keith Bogans without at least 3 guards injured is literally morally obliged to evaluate any opportunity to upgrade the SG spot.
(and don't hesitate to name us all the Centers and SFs you think the Spurs should sign and who are currently on the FA market.)
No.
agreed..The team we have currently is either going to sink or swim.
Larry Hughes would be a good pick up. Not sure the Spurs are willing to spend the money, though.
That would be ultimate small ball.
The only reason to sign Larry Hughes is if the Spurs are trying to tank.
Larry Hughes, really? These are sad days to be a Spurs fan.
I was really hoping this would stop once the trade deadline ended.
..Well be down to 2 games left in the season and still seeing posts about picking up horrible players like Hughes or still hearing about how tyrus thomas would have brought a championship to SA..
no to larry hughes...i also followed cavs for the last 4 years and hughes is not the one we want.....is he better than bogans???yes ...but he is injured all the time ...
i think spurs FO should consider signing a PF/C who will be waived within march 1st deadline...
so it has come to this. picking up the scraps of lottery teams.
It Is A Sad Day, When Spurs Fans Are Asking About Larry Hughes! No Way Would I Want Him In A Spurs Uniform
We could tank without signing anyone. I'm not saying the Spurs should sign him, but he is a whole lot better than Bogans & Mason. He is a clutch 3pt shooter, good passer & a decent defender. It wouldn't be the worse thing they could do.
With his injury history I think the league should just declare Hughes a de facto Trailblazer and make Portland sign him.
I agree, it would be an upgrade. Actually, Hughes injured and on the bench would be an upgrade over what the Spurs have been using at the 2 and 3.
What big man are we going to pick up at the deadline? , we let one go.
If you get waived from this Kings team, then you really suck...
so a lot of posters here would take Bogans over Hughes, ofcourse Hughes isn't the greatest player ever, but he is a huge upgrade over Bogans, if we are not going to get defense from that position might as well add a little more offense and again if he is healthy he gets a good number of steals each game and is a underrated passer/playmaker.
Again it is not like it would be Hughes and dropping Manu or Hill it is Bogans, should be a good thing, but I still want to see who else will be waived by the March 1 deadline, Hughes is up there on the list though
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
