pops an idiot for not playin ghill last season against the mavs in the playoffs, ghill3 was doing a fine job in the regular season guarding alot of the elite guards in league from kobe, nash, iverson who else did he on when given the opportunity
I can't say I agree with you on that. He didn't play Hill in the playoffs last year until he ran out of options. Hill (maybe not "ready" to play) could have helped earlier. Don't play these unproven guys when your core is consistently performing to a level that makes you a contender - until you're at that level you need to find something that works.
pops an idiot for not playin ghill last season against the mavs in the playoffs, ghill3 was doing a fine job in the regular season guarding alot of the elite guards in league from kobe, nash, iverson who else did he on when given the opportunity
So his teams always win despite his mistakes, which means he must be contributing something. Hint: Watch his defense sometime.
In addition, Pop benched Bowen last year in favor of Finley until it was too late as well, then comes in this year and touts Bogans as the same type player as Bowen. That's a pretty clear inidication that he's an idiot.
What pisses me off is the fact some of this seems so obvious from a personnel standpoint.
We are lacking a consistent athletic defensive presence in the paint next to Tim Duncan. We have a rookie who could at least somewhat fill the void. Pop's plan? Simply don't play the rookie at all. We'd rather go for broke on a small ball lineup than give ourselves any chance at having the necessary tools for victory.
What makes the situation even worse is that Ian has been decent in his garbage minutes.
It's not just Ian. You've got a guy like Hairston who IMO is significantly more talented than Bogans in every way except shooting. Why not pit him against Bogans for some minutes early in the season? Even if you're Pop and leaning against Hairston, you still give him a chance to succeed, simply because his unrealized potential could be high enough to warrant it.
Even more confusion is caused by Pop when he can't settle on a rotation with the players he's chosen.
The Ian story is just total BS, though. Exact skillset we need, groomed for years in our system, nope, no chance for you.
I'm pretty sure Hairston is the better mid-ranger shooter too.
Correlation =/= causation.
Hill got 24 minutes game 3 in a loss after getting 4 minutes in a win. If we are going by correlation = causation logic, then Hill got too many minutes the rest of the series.
way to overrate Ian's defense. It seems ok for a 7 footer but it is nothing to write home about, especially considering his foul rate.
so, you're saying Hill wasn't good enough for the playoffs last year and Ian shouldn't play this year - hmmm.
Hear, hear! The Spurs will not tolerate less than excellent defense.
I'm going simply on what he's done on defense this year that I've seen with my own eyes. His rotations and energy are far better than anyone on the team not named Ginobili and he has the height to change shots. It's really hard to overrate a guy's defense when he's the only center over 6'7" with any athletic ability on the entire roster.
Yes, but he's not the "centerpiece".![]()
Ian could've been playing a similar as Chris Andersen does in Denver. Oh well, we've got Bonner to depend on for rebounding and interior defense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)