Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 54
  1. #26
    Double facepalm...
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    2,842
    Interesting and intriguing comparison. Kudos.
    Wade is taking advantage of the rules intended to make scoring for him easier, but few other guards are willing to take that kind of punishment in the 1st place.

    When all is said and done Wade will not be known as the next, Jordan, Kobe, or Magic. He will be known as the 1st Dwayne Wade, and other players are going to be compared to him for the next 50 years.

  2. #27
    Believe.
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    3,699
    This is simply misinformation. Drexler was in no way your typical shooting guard in the 90s when it came to play-making. I think some people forget that he was actually quite skilled in play-making and passing. Look at the other better 2-guards in the 80s and early 90s, George Gervin, Rolando Blackman, Ron Harper, Mitch Richmond, Joe Dumars, Reggie Miller... none of those guys were better than 4-5 APG type of guards. Drexler routinely put up 6+ APG seasons. He went a full season averaging 8 APG. That's not typical for the 90s or for any era for a shooting guard. .

    Horrible examples. Ron Harper and Mitch Richmond were your typical one dimensional scoring guards in their primes. They have no other objective but to put the ball in the basket. so is Reggie Miller. And what's surprising is during the first half of the 90's, Harper and Drexlers APG average were not that different. (Diff of -1 APG). Drexler is not really a cut above the rest as you like to put it. Also that season where he averaged 8 APG btw is not in the 90's. It was back in the 80's.


    To sum it all, Drexler always had a great supporting cast coached by offensive genius Rick Adelman. Averaging 6 APG in that system while having a team high in Usage rate is something almost any All star caliber SG can achieve given the opportunity.


    The main difference between Drexler as a play-maker and Dwyane Wade as a play-maker is that Drexler eventually got a true point guard in Terry Porter that ended up taking much of that responsibility .
    and the Heat did'nt had one? How about two? Jason Williams and Gary Payton logged 60.5 minutes a game in 05-06. Both dished out a combined 8.1 APG, the same year Wade had a team high 6.7 APG.


    And good thing you brought up Porter. Terry's APG numbers went down from 10.1, 9.5 all the way to 5.2 because Drexler was in possession of the ball a lot of times.


    Lastly, Wade is a career 6.7 APG player. Clyde is at 5.6. Numbers favors way, any way you twist it.



    For someone who considered it a landslide in play-making for Wade, this is a ridiculous statement. Drexler was by far a superior rebounder. Bigger, taller, longer, and probably just as athletic...
    What does size have to do with this? You're seriously digging a hole for yourself Jamstoned. Landslide reference was mainly due to Wade's dominance when healthy. Wade was considered a Top 1-3 player for 2 years. Drexler never reached that level. Clyde was a Top 10 player at best.



    Drexler was the better rebounder and the stats support that assertion. It's not even arguable. Now, would you like to take into consideration that Wade is shorter and that Drexler sometimes would slide down to small forward? Sure, but you're entering into a conversation of excuses and reasons why Drexler was better. He still was the better rebounder....
    Id give Drexler the tiniest and slightest edge on rebounding. But if you're 6'7, 6.1 RPG is not something you should brag to a smaller compe ion. Wade is a phenomenal rebounder for his size, in terms of ability, Wade maximizes more in that regards compared to Drexler.


    Here's where history is lost. Drexler as the main option led his Blazers to two NBA Finals before he went on to win one in Houston with Hakeem.
    Two failures does'nt make it right. Without riding Hakeems cottails, Drexler should be joining Malone, Stockton, Ewing and Barkley in the loser corner.


    I would agree and most people would that Wade's 2006 le run shows a peak in careers that probably gives Wade an edge. But it's pretty silly to suggest Drexler didn't have much success as the main option..
    He did'nt have any success in the grandest scheme of things. Period. Lebron is being penalized for the same thing. Any player in that position does'nt get a pass just because they reach a final.

    Drexler was the reason the Blazers were contenders for many years in the late 80s and early 90s. As the main option, he had as much success as any other shooting guard in his era after Michael Jordan. He didn't have the ultimate success. But to say he didn't have much success is pretty silly...
    HOF'er have different standards than All Star players. These legendary Icons were expected to win a le as the main guy. Anything less is a failure. See Malone, Barkley, Ewing and Stockton. All great players but none will ever garner the same respect given to their championship winning peers.



    Is there a reason why you go to advanced stats and skip the actual stats that are actually similar? ..
    Advance stats owns. Plain and simple. Since we are speaking in reference to offensive efficiency, PER, TS, EFG, W/S. Wade is just a better subject than Drexler.


    At this point, no one has surpassed Wade's NBA Finals performance in terms of efficiency. When has Drexler done similar to this?


    Dwyane Wade Mia 200634.7 7.8 3.8 46.8 33.8PPG: 34.7
    APG: 7.8
    RPG: 3.8
    SPG: 2.7
    PER: 33.8*

    History high***


    It's hard to overstate how awesome Wade was in leading the Heat to their lone championship, particularly in the final four games when Miami rallied from a 2-0 deficit to stun the Mavs.


    Drexler never missed the playoffs in Portland. Never had a what 15 win season like Wade did as the main option to the team. Drexler never had the lows in his career Wade already has had..
    Season. Ending. Injury. You cant penalize a player when he's on street clothes child.


    In terms of pure skill, it's still close. In terms of overall career, they're right around the same level. With a few more seasons, Wade could easily separate himself. But, if Wade has more seasons like the last two where he puts up nice, pretty numbers but his teams is mediocre to bad and are lottery teams or first round exit playoff teams, he'll actually look more like Clyde, only with a higher peak in his career with that 2006 le. Neither Wade or Clyde is on Kobe's level at the moment. Wade can get there. He's not there. Multiple champion. League MVP. Finals MVP. Perennial all NBA and all NBA defensive. Hate or envy all you want, Wade is not at that level yet.
    Im not hating and I dont need to envy. Wade will get there, its not a matter of if but a matter of how many more. This offseason will redeem Wade and put him back on the top 2-3 player debate.

  3. #28
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    WAde is great but slightly overrated based on his aMAZING Finals run ...

    Drexler is VASTLY underrated due to not being able to lead his Blazers squads to a le ...

    Wade has been the 2nd best 2 guard to Kobe much like Drexler was to Jordan. Difference is wade is a lot closer to Kobe (and some would argue he at points been the better player) While no sane peson would argue Drexler>Jordan.

    TO me Drexler and Wade are similar but i give a slight edge to Wade ...those that claim Wade is >>>>>>>>>> Drexler or that it's a simple argument are short-sighted.
    Drexler was a great player as well.

  4. #29
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    Seems like people just forgot how great Drexler was at his peak.

    He was the 2nd best player in 91-92, right behind Jordan, averaged 27/6/7 over his two year peak, and still throwing in 21/4.5/7 as the 2nd option on a championship when he was past his prime.

    He finished #5 in MVP voting in 1988, #6 in 1991, and #2 in 1992 against players like Jordan, Bird, Magic, Barkley, Hakeem, Malone and Robinson.

    Wade, as great as he is, finished in the top 6 once in his career #3 last year.

  5. #30
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,104
    with ref's help Wade. Without ref's help, Glyde

  6. #31
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    give me wade

  7. #32
    Believe.
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    3,699
    Seems like people just forgot how great Drexler was at his peak.

    He was the 2nd best player in 91-92, right behind Jordan, averaged 27/6/7 over his two year peak, and still throwing in 21/4.5/7 as the 2nd option on a championship when he was past his prime.

    He finished #5 in MVP voting in 1988, #6 in 1991, and #2 in 1992 against players like Jordan, Bird, Magic, Barkley, Hakeem, Malone and Robinson.

    Wade, as great as he is, finished in the top 6 once in his career #3 last year.
    How is Drexler the second best player next to Jordan in 91-92 when he himself started to decline in terms of offensive production? He had a career low in points average, and the other areas of his game did'nt really shine in the process. Maybe his wisdom, but you can't measure that.


    David Robinson was a better plater than Drexler in 91-92, so I dont know where you based your information.

  8. #33
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Seems like people just forgot how great Drexler was at his peak.

    He was the 2nd best player in 91-92, right behind Jordan, averaged 27/6/7 over his two year peak, and still throwing in 21/4.5/7 as the 2nd option on a championship when he was past his prime.

    He finished #5 in MVP voting in 1988, #6 in 1991, and #2 in 1992 against players like Jordan, Bird, Magic, Barkley, Hakeem, Malone and Robinson.

    Wade, as great as he is, finished in the top 6 once in his career #3 last year.
    terrible comparison

    1st off, clyde was "second to jordan" as you suggest, because there was no one even on MJs plateau (skill and production-wise) at that time. on the other hand, there are a number of GREAT players that skill and production-wise, are very comparable to jordan, and its even arguable that there are several players that are more skilled and gifted than MJ right now.

    2nd, Wade hasnt finished his career yet. comparing the amount of times that he finished top in MVP voting is re ed at this point. especially when there are more elite swingman-type players in the league.

    3rd, Wade has had an absolutely AWFUL team, while Clyde consistently had a VERY good team. many people consider those Portland teams to be among the best teams to never win a le, and superior to some who actually DID win les.

  9. #34
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Wade isnt just heads and tails better than Clyde, i'm not saying that at all. But if I had to choose between building a team around either one of them, I'm taking Wade all day long.

  10. #35
    Believe.
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    3,699
    terrible comparison

    1st off, clyde was "second to jordan" as you suggest, because there was no one even on MJs plateau (skill and production-wise) at that time. on the other hand, there are a number of GREAT players that skill and production-wise, are very comparable to jordan, and its even arguable that there are several players that are more skilled and gifted than MJ right now.

    2nd, Wade hasnt finished his career yet. comparing the amount of times that he finished top in MVP voting is re ed at this point. especially when there are more elite swingman-type players in the league.

    3rd, Wade has had an absolutely AWFUL team, while Clyde consistently had a VERY good team. many people consider those Portland teams to be among the best teams to never win a le, and superior to some who actually DID win les.
    Thank you. All great points stretch.



    I would also like to add that finishing in the MVP votes to prove greatness is a worthless debate. Kobe Bryant was ranked as the best if not the second best player in the league for a couple of years before winning his MVP and he rarely finished in the Top 3 MVP votes. Just look at Kobe's 2005-2006 season.

  11. #36
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    Horrible examples. Ron Harper and Mitch Richmond were your typical one dimensional scoring guards in their primes. They have no other objective but to put the ball in the basket. so is Reggie Miller. And what's surprising is during the first half of the 90's, Harper and Drexlers APG average were not that different. (Diff of -1 APG). Drexler is not really a cut above the rest as you like to put it. Also that season where he averaged 8 APG btw is not in the 90's. It was back in the 80's.
    Those were typical shooting guards, even in the 90s. 90s SGs with the exception of Jordan were one dimensional scorers. That's what the typical SG was in the 90s. If not, tell me who were "typical" SGs in the 90s? Look at all of those 90s SGs, other than Jordan, who were better play-makers than Clyde?

    Ron Harper actually was one of the few SGs in that era who was a pretty good play-maker himself. He's closer to Drexler than the "typical" 90s SG in terms of play-making. Since you're so adamant about it being in the 90s, let's look at their respective APG in the 90s:

    Drexler/Harper APG

    90-91: 6.0/5.4
    91-92: 6.7/5.1
    92-93: 5.7/4.5
    93-94: 4.9/4.6
    94:95: 4.8/2.0
    95-96: 5.8/2.6
    96-97: 5.7/2.5
    97-98: 5.5/2.9

    Similar? Ok, when Harper was still a main option, sure. Drexler was still better. And if you want to talk about 90s SGs, then you take into consideration Harper's assist numbers in Chicago as well. Drexler was a better play-maker throughout the 90s. And, Harper is the one example outside Jordan and Drexler you have as coming close to being a good play-maker for a SG. Not so typical if those are the only three SGs in the 90s who were good play-makers.


    To sum it all, Drexler always had a great supporting cast coached by offensive genius Rick Adelman. Averaging 6 APG in that system while having a team high in Usage rate is something almost any All star caliber SG can achieve given the opportunity.
    Aren't you one to argue one of the reasons LeBron is better than Kobe is because Kobe has more talent on his team? Now that it works against your favor, you flip that argument? Please. It's not Drexler's fault Pat Riley hasn't put enough talent around Wade. And it's not like Drexler had HOFers or even perennial all stars on those Portland teams. He had some good teammates but that's not the reason he was a good play-maker.



    and the Heat did'nt had one? How about two? Jason Williams and Gary Payton logged 60.5 minutes a game in 05-06. Both dished out a combined 8.1 APG, the same year Wade had a team high 6.7 APG.
    Please. They combined for 8.1 APG. Drexler was still averaging 5-6 APG with Terry Porter averaging 9-10 APG by himself. Even when J-Will and GP were the PGs on the Heat, Wade had the basketball in his hands the majority of the time and he intiated and facilitated the offense most of the time. Most good players who have the ball in their hands as much as Wade does are capable of having good assist totals. Clyde did it while still largely playing off the ball.


    And good thing you brought up Porter. Terry's APG numbers went down from 10.1, 9.5 all the way to 5.2 because Drexler was in possession of the ball a lot of times.
    It really is a good thing I brought up Terry Porter. But it is not a good thing that you made this argument because it's predicated on a fallacy. The season Porter's APG fell to 5.2, it wasn't because Drexler was given the ball more to create. Or did you choose to ignore the fact that Rod Strickland averaged 7.2 APG that season and Adelman started playing Porter at the 2-guard as well? Please study your basketball history before making informed claims.


    Lastly, Wade is a career 6.7 APG player. Clyde is at 5.6. Numbers favors way, any way you twist it.
    Favored similarly to the way Clyde's 6.1 RPG are to Wade's 4.9 RPG, yet you choose to call that pretty much a wash. You're talking out of both ends of your mouth. Stay consistent.



    What does size have to do with this? You're seriously digging a hole for yourself Jamstoned. Landslide reference was mainly due to Wade's dominance when healthy. Wade was considered a Top 1-3 player for 2 years. Drexler never reached that level. Clyde was a Top 10 player at best.
    This is a laughable comment considering what you argue next in the following quote.

    Drexler finished second in MVP voting in 1991-92. Your NBA history fails you. I've already acknowledged that Wade's peak in his career is greater than Drexler's. Your foundation to argue Wade is the better player "by a landslide" is shaky at best and predicated on inaccurate and misinformed notions of "facts."


    Id give Drexler the tiniest and slightest edge on rebounding. But if you're 6'7, 6.1 RPG is not something you should brag to a smaller compe ion. Wade is a phenomenal rebounder for his size, in terms of ability, Wade maximizes more in that regards compared to Drexler.
    This is why your comment about "what does size have to do with it" is laughable. Who is the better rebounder, Dwight Howard or Jason Kidd? Your logic says it's Dwight Howard by the tiniest and slightest edge because Dwight is bigger and taller. Well yeahhhh. No , Sherlock. That's why Drexler is the better rebounder than Wade. 6.1 RPG to 4.9 RPG. Works for your assist argument but you renounce it here. That's inconsistent stupidity, my friend.


    Two failures does'nt make it right. Without riding Hakeems cottails, Drexler should be joining Malone, Stockton, Ewing and Barkley in the loser corner.
    So you'd say Kobe is still the better player than LeBron? Oh, of course not. You've been suggesting LeBron has been better than Kobe all season long. You continue to go against your own failed logic. Making it to the NBA Finals twice as the main option of a team is not what you intimated as "not much success."

    But if you want to press this issue, type it for me. Post it for all of SpursTalk: "Kobe is better than LeBron." Do it or your aforementioned point is a dull instrument... pointless.


    He did'nt have any success in the grandest scheme of things. Period. Lebron is being penalized for the same thing. Any player in that position does'nt get a pass just because they reach a final.
    But as I just stated, YOU don't penalize LeBron for that. So why not?



    HOF'er have different standards than All Star players. These legendary Icons were expected to win a le as the main guy. Anything less is a failure. See Malone, Barkley, Ewing and Stockton. All great players but none will ever garner the same respect given to their championship winning peers.
    James Worthy is not better than Charles Barkley or Karl Malone. Sorry. Tony Parker is not better than Jason Kidd or Chris Paul. It doesn't work that way. Whatever you want to think is fine. It's your opinion. But Cedric Maxwell or Chauncey Billups winning NBA Finals MVP in a le run does not erase the rest of their body of work when you evaluate them. Wade is well on his way to being one of the all time greats. But his career isn't finished. What if his career takes a turn like a Grant Hill or like a Cedric Maxwell and becomes average or mediocre for the rest of his NBA career? What then? You take that peak into consideration. But it's not the only factor in evaluating the greatness of a player.


    Advance stats owns. Plain and simple. Since we are speaking in reference to offensive efficiency, PER, TS, EFG, W/S. Wade is just a better subject than Drexler.
    As has been said on this messageboard before, I guess that makes Chris Paul automatically better than Magic Johnson ever was. I guess Greg Oden is a top 10 player in the league. Using advanced stats helps, but using them as the foundation of an argument when comparing is a negligent exercise in Hollingeresque stats logic.


    At this point, no one has surpassed Wade's NBA Finals performance in terms of efficiency. When has Drexler done similar to this?


    Dwyane Wade Mia 200634.7 7.8 3.8 46.8 33.8PPG: 34.7
    APG: 7.8
    RPG: 3.8
    SPG: 2.7
    PER: 33.8*

    History high***
    Congratulations on Wade for that 2006 le run. It's the main reason why I do give Wade the edge over Drexler. You did read that right? I specifically said in my initial post I would give Wade the edge because of that. But again, it's not the only thing I look at. And it's foolish to do that.


    It's hard to overstate how awesome Wade was in leading the Heat to their lone championship, particularly in the final four games when Miami rallied from a 2-0 deficit to stun the Mavs.
    You're doing a good job at showing how awesome Wade was. I basically responded to this above.


    Season. Ending. Injury. You cant penalize a player when he's on street clothes child.
    The Miami Heat were 10-41 that season with Wade in the line-up. That's on pace for a 16 win season regardless of Wade. Penalize him for his team sucking even when he did play.


    Im not hating and I dont need to envy. Wade will get there, its not a matter of if but a matter of how many more. This offseason will redeem Wade and put him back on the top 2-3 player debate.
    Wade is great. I think he's in the top 3-4 player discussion right now already. I'm more curious at how low you regard Clyde Drexler. Clyde was a superstar in his own right. And since Wade is only about 7 seasons into his NBA career, at this moment, I think the two are very comparable players.

  12. #37
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    How is Drexler the second best player next to Jordan in 91-92 when he himself started to decline in terms of offensive production? He had a career low in points average, and the other areas of his game did'nt really shine in the process. Maybe his wisdom, but you can't measure that.


    David Robinson was a better plater than Drexler in 91-92, so I dont know where you based your information.
    Drexler finished 2nd in MVP voting in 1991-92. That's a pretty good indication. Not always the best indicator, but it does give some validity to the contention he was the second best player that season.

  13. #38
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    Drexler finished 2nd in MVP voting in 1991-92. That's a pretty good indication. Not always the best indicator, but it does give some validity to the contention he was the second best player that season.
    I agree with the voters unless you use PER or some other crap Clyde was the 2nd best player that year.
    MJ even admitted it was Why he went out of his way to torch him in the Finals ...he wanted to show that the gap etween #1 and #2 was still HUGE ...

    A side not i think that year Clyde took it to Mj a bit in the All-star game. Some even called him jordan "west" ...
    Mj decide to light him up in the Finals I wasnt always an MJ fan but aLWAYS respected his gangsta' ...

  14. #39
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    Those were typical shooting guards, even in the 90s. 90s SGs with the exception of Jordan were one dimensional scorers. That's what the typical SG was in the 90s. If not, tell me who were "typical" SGs in the 90s? Look at all of those 90s SGs, other than Jordan, who were better play-makers than Clyde?

    Ron Harper actually was one of the few SGs in that era who was a pretty good play-maker himself. He's closer to Drexler than the "typical" 90s SG in terms of play-making. Since you're so adamant about it being in the 90s, let's look at their respective APG in the 90s:

    Drexler/Harper APG

    90-91: 6.0/5.4
    91-92: 6.7/5.1
    92-93: 5.7/4.5
    93-94: 4.9/4.6
    94:95: 4.8/2.0
    95-96: 5.8/2.6
    96-97: 5.7/2.5
    97-98: 5.5/2.9

    Similar? Ok, when Harper was still a main option, sure. Drexler was still better. And if you want to talk about 90s SGs, then you take into consideration Harper's assist numbers in Chicago as well. Drexler was a better play-maker throughout the 90s. And, Harper is the one example outside Jordan and Drexler you have as coming close to being a good play-maker for a SG. Not so typical if those are the only three SGs in the 90s who were good play-makers.




    Aren't you one to argue one of the reasons LeBron is better than Kobe is because Kobe has more talent on his team? Now that it works against your favor, you flip that argument? Please. It's not Drexler's fault Pat Riley hasn't put enough talent around Wade. And it's not like Drexler had HOFers or even perennial all stars on those Portland teams. He had some good teammates but that's not the reason he was a good play-maker.





    Please. They combined for 8.1 APG. Drexler was still averaging 5-6 APG with Terry Porter averaging 9-10 APG by himself. Even when J-Will and GP were the PGs on the Heat, Wade had the basketball in his hands the majority of the time and he intiated and facilitated the offense most of the time. Most good players who have the ball in their hands as much as Wade does are capable of having good assist totals. Clyde did it while still largely playing off the ball.




    It really is a good thing I brought up Terry Porter. But it is not a good thing that you made this argument because it's predicated on a fallacy. The season Porter's APG fell to 5.2, it wasn't because Drexler was given the ball more to create. Or did you choose to ignore the fact that Rod Strickland averaged 7.2 APG that season and Adelman started playing Porter at the 2-guard as well? Please study your basketball history before making informed claims.




    Favored similarly to the way Clyde's 6.1 RPG are to Wade's 4.9 RPG, yet you choose to call that pretty much a wash. You're talking out of both ends of your mouth. Stay consistent.





    This is a laughable comment considering what you argue next in the following quote.

    Drexler finished second in MVP voting in 1991-92. Your NBA history fails you. I've already acknowledged that Wade's peak in his career is greater than Drexler's. Your foundation to argue Wade is the better player "by a landslide" is shaky at best and predicated on inaccurate and misinformed notions of "facts."




    This is why your comment about "what does size have to do with it" is laughable. Who is the better rebounder, Dwight Howard or Jason Kidd? Your logic says it's Dwight Howard by the tiniest and slightest edge because Dwight is bigger and taller. Well yeahhhh. No , Sherlock. That's why Drexler is the better rebounder than Wade. 6.1 RPG to 4.9 RPG. Works for your assist argument but you renounce it here. That's inconsistent stupidity, my friend.




    So you'd say Kobe is still the better player than LeBron? Oh, of course not. You've been suggesting LeBron has been better than Kobe all season long. You continue to go against your own failed logic. Making it to the NBA Finals twice as the main option of a team is not what you intimated as "not much success."

    But if you want to press this issue, type it for me. Post it for all of SpursTalk: "Kobe is better than LeBron." Do it or your aforementioned point is a dull instrument... pointless.




    But as I just stated, YOU don't penalize LeBron for that. So why not?





    James Worthy is not better than Charles Barkley or Karl Malone. Sorry. Tony Parker is not better than Jason Kidd or Chris Paul. It doesn't work that way. Whatever you want to think is fine. It's your opinion. But Cedric Maxwell or Chauncey Billups winning NBA Finals MVP in a le run does not erase the rest of their body of work when you evaluate them. Wade is well on his way to being one of the all time greats. But his career isn't finished. What if his career takes a turn like a Grant Hill or like a Cedric Maxwell and becomes average or mediocre for the rest of his NBA career? What then? You take that peak into consideration. But it's not the only factor in evaluating the greatness of a player.




    As has been said on this messageboard before, I guess that makes Chris Paul automatically better than Magic Johnson ever was. I guess Greg Oden is a top 10 player in the league. Using advanced stats helps, but using them as the foundation of an argument when comparing is a negligent exercise in Hollingeresque stats logic.




    Congratulations on Wade for that 2006 le run. It's the main reason why I do give Wade the edge over Drexler. You did read that right? I specifically said in my initial post I would give Wade the edge because of that. But again, it's not the only thing I look at. And it's foolish to do that.




    You're doing a good job at showing how awesome Wade was. I basically responded to this above.




    The Miami Heat were 10-41 that season with Wade in the line-up. That's on pace for a 16 win season regardless of Wade. Penalize him for his team sucking even when he did play.




    Wade is great. I think he's in the top 3-4 player discussion right now already. I'm more curious at how low you regard Clyde Drexler. Clyde was a superstar in his own right. And since Wade is only about 7 seasons into his NBA career, at this moment, I think the two are very comparable players.
    this was a great post ...informed, pointed facts to support ...stats but not used as blunt instrument ...Jamstone brings it again.

  15. #40
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    How is Drexler the second best player next to Jordan in 91-92 when he himself started to decline in terms of offensive production? He had a career low in points average, and the other areas of his game did'nt really shine in the process. Maybe his wisdom, but you can't measure that.


    David Robinson was a better plater than Drexler in 91-92, so I dont know where you based your information.
    Were you even watching basketball back then?

  16. #41
    Veteran Lars's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    1,615
    Drexler played with hand checking.

    Clyde > Wade

  17. #42
    Complete player hitmanyr2k's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Post Count
    8,349
    Scoring-Wade
    Rebounding-Wade
    Ballhandling- Wade
    Playmaking-Wade
    NBA Finals MVP- Wade


    Come on. No offense to the great Clyde Drexler, but he is nowhere near Wade as a player. Legacy wise then its close but skills wise Wade wins in a landslide.
    When it comes to scoring you can't compare these players from different eras. The guards/forwards today just have it too easy with the new rules. Their scoring numbers are inflated because of this. During Drexler's PEAK years he averaged 7 free throws at best on 20-21 shot attempts per game. He only hit his high of 7 for two seasons. The rest of the time he was averaging anywhere from 4-6 free throw attempts per game on 16-18 shot attempts per game. He wasn't in an era where the refs were whistle-happy and parading swingmen to the foul line.

    Wade came into the league just as the rules were being changed and he benefitted greatly from this when Stern decided to handcuff defenders. To put it in perspective Wade in his 2nd year averaged 17 shot attempts a game but averaged 10 free throws per game. His 3rd year he averaged 19 shot attempts per game and averaged 11 free throws a game. To put that even more in perspective an athletic freak like Michael Jordan who drove to the rim just as much as Wade once averaged 11 free throws a game....but his shot attempts were at 27...8 more shot attempts than Wade when he had the same number of free throws. That's how ridiculously easy it is to get to the line and inflate your scoring averages these days. An athletic freak like Drexler would thrive in this era.

  18. #43
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    terrible comparison

    1st off, clyde was "second to jordan" as you suggest, because there was no one even on MJs plateau (skill and production-wise) at that time. on the other hand, there are a number of GREAT players that skill and production-wise, are very comparable to jordan, and its even arguable that there are several players that are more skilled and gifted than MJ right now.
    What? There are several players that are more skilled and gifted than MJ right now? Pray tell.

    2nd, Wade hasnt finished his career yet. comparing the amount of times that he finished top in MVP voting is re ed at this point. especially when there are more elite swingman-type players in the league.
    Just as re ed as comparing stats of players before production started to decline at the tail end of a guard's career. Almost all guards see their statistics peak before 30 years old, mostly around 27 to 29 years old, it applied to Stockton, it applied to Jordan, it applied to Isiah, it applied Drexler, it applied to Kobe.

    Guess how old Wade is right now.

    Statistically, we have seen the best of Wade. He may be more of an MVP candidate in the future, but it is unlikely that he would challenge for league MVP for too long, especially with the marginal supporting cast he has now.

    3rd, Wade has had an absolutely AWFUL team, while Clyde consistently had a VERY good team. many people consider those Portland teams to be among the best teams to never win a le, and superior to some who actually DID win les.
    Wouldn't that inflate Wade's numbers statistically? Do you expect the Heat to suddenly start contending? If so, how? If not, how would you figure Wade would be able to challenge for MVP voting in the near future and over take Drexler's accomplishment in that regard?

  19. #44
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    Thank you. All great points stretch.



    I would also like to add that finishing in the MVP votes to prove greatness is a worthless debate. Kobe Bryant was ranked as the best if not the second best player in the league for a couple of years before winning his MVP and he rarely finished in the Top 3 MVP votes. Just look at Kobe's 2005-2006 season.
    Bryant finished a #4 in MVP voting that year, what is wrong with that?
    Last edited by ambchang; 03-24-2010 at 03:50 PM.

  20. #45
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    What? There are several players that are more skilled and gifted than MJ right now? Pray tell.
    As usual, you take things out of context, as I said its ARGUABLE. However, yes, there are other players more skilled and gifted than MJ. Kobe is more skilled. Carmello is more skilled. Lebron is more gifted. Wade is more gifted, and very comparable in terms of skills. Durant may be more skilled (lets see how his game develops as he reaches his prime years first though).

    Just as re ed as comparing stats of players before production started to decline at the tail end of a guard's career. Almost all guards see their statistics peak before 30 years old, mostly around 27 to 29 years old, it applied to Stockton, it applied to Jordan, it applied to Isiah, it applied Drexler, it applied to Kobe.

    Guess how old Wade is right now.

    Statistically, we have seen the best of Wade. He may be more of an MVP candidate in the future, but it is unlikely that he would challenge for league MVP for too long, especially with the marginal supporting cast he has now.
    Neat, but I never compared their stats in such a manner. I just feel that Wade is a better basketball player. I like the style in which he plays better. He has undeniable skills. Physically he is a monster, possibly posessing the quickest first step a SG has ever had. He has PG skills and can run an offense well, but can also score as well as anyone. He is very smart, and plays more aggressive than pretty much any star in the league right now, focusing very heavily on getting close to the rim and high percentage shots.

    Like I said in another post, if I had to chose to build a team around either one of them, I would take Wade. I never said hes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde or anything like that. Clyde was a beast too. I just think Wade is better.

    Wouldn't that inflate Wade's numbers statistically? Do you expect the Heat to suddenly start contending? If so, how? If not, how would you figure Wade would be able to challenge for MVP voting in the near future and over take Drexler's accomplishment in that regard?
    Are you re ed? How the would playing on an awful team inflate Wade's ability to be an MVP? Great players on teams that go nowhere never win MVPs. Obviously you didn't even read your own post before posting this, moron.

  21. #46
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    As usual, you take things out of context, as I said its ARGUABLE. However, yes, there are other players more skilled and gifted than MJ. Kobe is more skilled. Carmello is more skilled. Lebron is more gifted. Wade is more gifted, and very comparable in terms of skills. Durant may be more skilled (lets see how his game develops as he reaches his prime years first though).
    Does that translate into a better player though? You can argue that Drexler was just as skilled and gifted as Jordan in the same context. Robinson was more gifted, Hakeem was more gifted, Dominque was about as gifted, Stockton was more skilled. So what?

    Neat, but I never compared their stats in such a manner. I just feel that Wade is a better basketball player. I like the style in which he plays better. He has undeniable skills. Physically he is a monster, possibly posessing the quickest first step a SG has ever had. He has PG skills and can run an offense well, but can also score as well as anyone. He is very smart, and plays more aggressive than pretty much any star in the league right now, focusing very heavily on getting close to the rim and high percentage shots.
    Drexler's 1st step wasn't too shabby himself. Drexler can run an offense very well, very smart, drives to the basket relentlessly.

    If you just want to say that you felt Wade is a better basketball player because you like his style, just say so. There is no need to call my earlier argument re ed when you can't even refute that.

    Like I said in another post, if I had to chose to build a team around either one of them, I would take Wade. I never said hes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde or anything like that. Clyde was a beast too. I just think Wade is better.
    You heard me said otherwise? I simply stated that Drexler's career accomplishments has been devalued over time.

    Are you re ed? How the would playing on an awful team inflate Wade's ability to be an MVP? Great players on teams that go nowhere never win MVPs. Obviously you didn't even read your own post before posting this, moron.
    Did I say that? You read that anywhere? Can you read? Quote me.

  22. #47
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Does that translate into a better player though? You can argue that Drexler was just as skilled and gifted as Jordan in the same context. Robinson was more gifted, Hakeem was more gifted, Dominque was about as gifted, Stockton was more skilled. So what?



    Drexler's 1st step wasn't too shabby himself. Drexler can run an offense very well, very smart, drives to the basket relentlessly.

    If you just want to say that you felt Wade is a better basketball player because you like his style, just say so. There is no need to call my earlier argument re ed when you can't even refute that.



    You heard me said otherwise? I simply stated that Drexler's career accomplishments has been devalued over time.



    Did I say that? You read that anywhere? Can you read? Quote me.


    tbh all of your points had no point, just you being butthurt over the fact that your previous reply had no relevance to what was first being replied to by myself.

    proof of a defeated dumbass IMO krofl

    especially when you decide to start comparing how gifted Centers are to Jordan (who was a guard, in case you didnt know tbh)

    * cue in more ambchang nonsense-filled argumentative bull posts *

    or maybe i should just go the "spurfan" route.

    wade - 1

    glyde - 0

    wade > glyde

    1 ring got


  23. #48
    leveled up sook's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    9,632
    Seriously?

    How man people here actually saw drexler play? He is a ytt tytys t ty commetator but he was un unbelievable player

  24. #49
    1 > 0 lil_penny's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Post Count
    3,387
    or maybe i should just go the "spurfan" route.

    wade - 1

    glyde - 0

    wade > glyde

    1 ring got

    ?????????

  25. #50
    Believe. PGDynasty24's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    2,041
    Both great players,but I take D-wade. He is a much more complete player

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •