Would you trade George Hill for Aaron Brooks?

[lennyalderette]

oh and i think AB has good character i like the kid, but george thrill has soo much potential, with even a better at ude , and the guy can dunk all day if he wanted to, hes not going balls out yet. i know he will be replacing TP!! hes way faster than daron williams and plays better D than him so this kid is going big places. and so that leads me to say " to the no"

[Waps1980]

Hill has been lucky to have TP and Manu to look up to learn things from.
You can see it in the way he plays.
Hill will be the future of the Spurs

[Brazil]

^I'm not sure Hill will be the future of the spurs or spurs are in trouble tbh.

Anyway I've noticed he improved a lot his layups (TP example) and developed some balls and fire (Manu example)

[it's me]

Lol @ the lone Rocket fan and his various trolls voting yes.

[DJB]

GH3 is a much more complete player than AB and even TP... no.

[LoneStarState'sPride]

no!

, I'd take Hill over Parker and Brooks. Only his 2nd season, and he has so much more room to grow.

[DPG21920]

GH3 is a much more complete player than AB and even TP... no.

no!

, I'd take Hill over Parker and Brooks. Only his 2nd season, and he has so much more room to grow.

What?

[LoneStarState'sPride]

What?

Parker has hit his ceiling (and I love me some TP, btw), Brooks is playing near his.

Hill is only in year 2, and he's already shown he's competent enough to shoulder much of the burden of running point for a perennial contender like SA. The upside for him, especially with him playing with Tony, is ridiculous.

[FeZZy]

eh...

[HarlemHeat37]

George Hill is incredibly overrated here, and I say this as a big fan of his..

[SpursRulez4eVeR]

to the fk'n no

[Spursfan092120]

Just like I said in the thread "Aaron Brooks is a monster.." Aaron Brooks is a good player, but overall, Hill is better...no...I wouldn't trade.

[Big P]

who?

[LoneStarState'sPride]

It's because Manu is on this team! How well did Hill do against the Nets when Manu was out?

If Parker was playing against the Nets, no way the Spurs would have lost that game!

Note: at no point did I ever state that Hill is better than Parker. He's not. When I said Parker's hit his ceiling, I mean that I honestly don't think he can play better than he has consistently played since '07. I'm saying Hill's got a ridiculous upside precisely because he's playing next to Parker (one of the league's premiers PG's).

And I don't know why the you brought up Manu--everyone knows he makes the entire team better, but last I checked, this was a discussion primarily about PGs.

[LoneStarState'sPride]

I bring up Manu, because He he opens it up for Hill . Hill isn't a great playmaker at all. We see that all the time, when Manu goes and takes his break on the bench.

I like Hill a lot, but I doubt he is ever going to considered a top 3 point guard like Tony was last year.

Tony when healthy is one of the top 3 point guards in the NBA, I doubt Hill will ever get to that level.

Yes, Hill is not a playmaker. Tony wasn't a very consistent shooter until the last couple of seasons. And Hill's defense is better than Tony's at this stage of their respective careers. And as much as Manu opens it up for Hill when he's in the game, he does the same for Tony--it's just the nature of his game.

Idk if Hill is ever going to get to Tony's level, but he has tons of potential. He's already starting to look eerily like a younger Parker on SOME of his drives to the hoop. If he can pick up just a fraction of Parker's finishing ability, and still keep his jump shot, George has a crazy high ceiling.

[sook]

hill has had some nice fluke games I'll give him that.

btw, TP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hill

[Chieflion]

hill has had some nice fluke games I'll give him that.

btw, TP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hill

sook, I will just say that each organisation would not do the trade because of their reasons.

[George Gervin's Afro]

No. He may be our best defensive player.

[George Gervin's Afro]

hill has had some nice fluke games I'll give him that.

btw, TP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hill

so how many 'fluke games' does he have to have dummy before you grant that he is a damn good player.

[sook]

so how many 'fluke games' does he have to have dummy before you grant that he is a damn good player.

I was kidding. He is a good player, but he is getting Manu Ginobili treatment when it comes to being overrated to jordan status.

[LoneStarState'sPride]

I was kidding. He is a good player, but he is getting Manu Ginobili treatment when it comes to being overrated to jordan status.

Manu Ginobili:

2001 Italian League Championship
2001 Euroleague le
2001 Euroleague Final Four MVP
2003 NBA le
2004 Olympic Gold Medal
2005 NBA All-Star
2005 NBA le (1 vote shy of Finals MVP)
2007 NBA le
2008 NBA Sixth Man of the Year Award
2008 Olympic Bronze Medal

No, he's not Jordan, but overrated? no. Quite frankly, I'm glad he's not like Mike--he has his own unique game. I think his value as a team player far overshadows even his myriad personal accomplishments.

[noob cake]

Brooks >>>>> Hill in scoring

Hill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooks in defense

I'll take that extra defense.

[exstatic]

George Hill is incredibly overrated here, and I say this as a big fan of his..

You really think Brooks is all that? I mean, it's not like we're comparing GH to CP3 and saying "no we won't make that trade".

Brooks is an ultra-quick score first lead guard, but he's a shrimp and doesn't play much D. GH is also a better long range shooter. He's 4-5 inches taller (for real) with a much bigger wingspan.

[HarlemHeat37]

You really think Brooks is all that? I mean, it's not like we're comparing GH to CP3 and saying "no we won't make that trade".

Brooks is an ultra-quick score first lead guard, but he's a shrimp and doesn't play much D. GH is also a better long range shooter. He's 4-5 inches taller (for real) with a much bigger wingspan.

I would take George Hill over him, I'm not arguing that..most of the people here are arguing like Hill is levels better than Brooks, which he clearly isn't, and a number of people here have said that he's already as good as Tony Parker, which he isn't..

[TD 21]

Hill is more versatile and a better for fit the Spurs, so I definitely wouldn't make that trade.