Purgatory isn't that bad a word. HH37 isn't that offbase.
The issue is that I fail to objectively see how the Spurs on paper could improve to the point where they would be seen as better than PHX or LA. And that's ignoring the east, and ignoring the possibility that Utah could have a top 3 pick.
Let's be honest, everyone is counting on Tiago Splitter. That's great. Even if he signs, and that's a big if, that pretty much just leaves them with minimum salaries, the draft, and maybe the LLE to improve the squad.
I love Splitter. I think Splitter will instantly be a legit starting caliber center. But next season Robin Lopez will be back, and he's already proven himself as a legit starting center. Does Tiago Splitter really leapfrog the Spurs over a Suns team with Lopez?
Then the argument becomes about how much better Hill and Blair can become, maybe even Hairston or the 20th pick who could be a small forward. Awesome. Will the progress be so much more than the improvement of Dragic and Dudley, and the fact the Earl Clark still isn't a part of their rotation?
So how on paper are the Spurs going to be any better than the team that just straight wrecked them?
, will they be any better than Dallas? If Rick Carlisle hadn't Popped Beaubois that series goes 7, and I don't even know that the Spurs get out of the first round.
The most realistic, and optimistic offseason is signing Splitter and hoping someone decent falls to them in the draft and can play right away. That's not enough, not at this stage in the careers of the big 3. Unless there's a trade for a real upgrade using Jefferson, or some outlandish pie-in-the-sky fantasy blockbuster like Parker-Splitter-Jefferson for Bosh-Calderon, there's nothing else. And even that fever-dreamed lunacy wouldn't make the Spurs better necessarily, only different.
And that's the best case. Worst case . . . Splitter decides to wait out the looming workstoppage in Europe, and the Spurs are left with . . . what? The MLE on . . . who? Basically they'd just re-sign Bonner and pray.