Reply With Quote
Bwahahahaha
logic>>>>>>>>>luva
He speaks the truth.
I've always called that Franchise a circus, and I ain't changing my tune.
Bwahahahaha
logic>>>>>>>>>luva
Please. ESPN/Media wrote that talking point/marching order 30 years ago and you humps have been parroting it ever since.
You fart catchin' bas s, ya.
I see it with my own eyes. Unlike you, I live out here. Laker flags don't fly on cars unless the Lakers are within shouting distance of a le. Celebrities and wannabes alike "root" for the Lakers because to not do so wouldn't be fashionable. And then you have celebrities like Denzel wearing a New York Yankees hat in Staples. Most of the crowd aside from the upper sections are texting rather than watching the game. Run of the mill casual Lakerfan can't name a player besides Kobe. Laker fans don't register on message boards until it's "safe," i.e. when their team's contender.
Your favorite franchise, much like the town they play in, really does symbolize all that is vapid, trendy, phony, and "glamorous." No media influence needed. The Lakers franchise lives off those adjectives and does everything it can to fuel the Hollywood image of itself. Jeannie Buss posed for Playboy. Her wilted and ugly old man fancies himself a poor man's Hefner. Magic brought drama, as did Shaq, and now Kobe.
It's the truth. The Lakers are a in' sideshow. Always have been, always will be. You don't have to like it, but you have to accept it.
Just like that.
How many fill in the blank teams are as drama laden as the Los Angeles Lakers?
The Knicks don't even have on you in that department.
#3
Thread: conqueso vs. withcheese: the showdown
URL: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50587
Date: 9/26/06
Ranking: 3 / 10
Magnitude:9.0
Here it is, the Turning Point in the history of the troll forum. It was at this point that I established myself as King of the Trolls with a masterful display of intense dualistic trolling. CuckingFunt makes sure her voice is heard early and often in a fight that has absolutely nothing to do with her, but even that attention-grubbing couldn’t steal the thunder away from the second greatest showdown of all time: conqueso vs. withcheese.
Conqueso’s posts are in blue, withcheese’s posts are in red, and everyone else is quoted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
this is gonna be lame
that comes out of retirement to make one post that isnt all that offensive and isnt funny in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER and than expects me to get all flustered and by it.
conqueso is a
hes probably writing some bull essay right now about how much we all suck for doing this. him. if he wants a piece of me, he needs to bring that or go back to the troll graveyard.
So you want me to bring it? Here it is.
withcheese, you are lamer than a lame troll. You are the epitome of why this forum has been so godawful to read over the last three months. You come in out of nowhere with a lame adaption of a good troll, pretend to be me for one post, then quickly abandon any semblance of the gimmick you created for yourself and go on the warpath, trying to be as offensive as possible. You have single-handedly run off several excellent trolls who made this forum go round way before you even had an internet connection. You hypocritically chide ThinkingMan for not keeping in character, but you lost your own character long ago. You say that you have owned CuckingFunt, but you are the one who feels the perpetual need to criticize any meritorious argument she raises, regardless of whether or not you actually agree with it. You are the worst kind of troll...nay, you are the worst kind of human...you refuse to practice the things you preach, you rouse the rabble just for kicks, and you make the most personally demeaning insults that I have ever seen. You are clearly some y little high school brat like alvarez or NorCal, bored with your lot in life, lacking anything of substance to sustain you. You are the closest thing I've ever met to an evil man. Congratulations.
hahahahahahahaahhhahahahaha!!!!!!
that was you "bringing it"???????????????????????
who the do you think you are? this is the ING INTERENET !!!
ooooooooo...conqueso thinks im ing EVIL...
END OF THE ING WORLD!!!!!!!
please, your ass opinion of me could not matter less. you throw your ing morals around like your some ing saint, like you have some right to judge. what the have you done thats so ing great? stood up for some fat ugly on some interenet message board?? stood up for some ty in this forum?? so ING what?!?! you want a ing metal?? you think you deserve anyones respect. you sure as missed out on that one asshole. you dont know what your talking about. you suck, i win, thats the end, so deal with it !!!!
i already dealt with you .
why dont you go read that thread again to see how much of a ing MORON you are and shut up, ok?
im done with cf because shes an idiot who i just filleted red lobster style with a billion word post...or did you miss that?
here you go: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50577
dont forget to actually READ the ing thing, even though i know that will be hard for you since you just seem to IGNORE anything that doesnt comport with the rosy ing delusional self image of yourself that exists only in your own mind
Is that what you think? Is that what you all think?
I don't know whether to be personally offended that you would think such a thing, or laugh at its irrationality.
How can you compare me to him? How are we even in the same league? He tries to emulate me with that long ass post, but almost the entire thing was quoted material. He doesn't have the intellectual ability to churn out such an immaculate piece of trolling as The Apology. He wouldn't even know where to begin. The irony that was infused in that post was so biting as to be almost sinister. Read it again; see how wonderfully I weave the concepts of offending and being offended. Watch how I juxtapose two an hetical positions. Look at the subtle humor of listing each and every lame troll in alphabetical order. Trust me, I've been reading withcheese's post all along the way, and you and I both know he simply couldn't orchestate something as masterful as that. His lame attempt to hearken back to my apology with his response to my post wasn't original or insightful either; it misunderstood the raison d'etre of the whole apology. It failed to capture the duality of being both a complete joke that will never be adhered to with the reality of a strict observance. It was a feeble attempt to make fun of a piece of writing that I consider to be among my very finest. I can't say enough about how much dumber he is than me, and therein lies the greatest irony: he just posted the longest post in ST history [here it is: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show....php?p=1210409; it's also #5 on this Top Ten List] in order to prove he was smarter than you and offend me at the same time. He did neither. At the very least, you should realize that if I had written that, it wouldn't have failed so miserably.
what you wont respond to my ? to much for you to handle? you have to talk to cf, try to get her to come over to your side? how ing LAME is that? well let me let you in on a little secret...that wont help you any. shes just as DUMB as you are. you think writing with a bunch of big words makes you smart...well it doesnt you stupid !!! you need to shut the up and go back to your little hole because your smack is weak. at least cf woudl pretned like she had some kind of argument to try to get me with. you just come in here spouting a bunch of "thou shalt not" BULL and expect me to even LISTEN to you???? what the >!?!?!
your gonna have to try harder conqueso to get me if you can
self congratulation? what the does that even MEAN?!?! what, i think im right? SO DO YOU !!! look at all those ing posts from the withcheese vs. the trolls thread. you are constatnly demeaning me, trying to blow yourself up. yay, im doing the same thing, but you, EVERYONE is like that. this is the ing TROLL FORUM, but bigger than that, this is the ING INTERENET!!!!
jesus, you are dumber than i thought. hows that for congratulating myself??
I don't understand how thoroughly explaining something means that I'm "arguing with myself." I read through some of that ridiculously long post and saw your arguments in that other thread. You explain your points, when you actually had points to make. Yes, it is true that I am not known for my brevity. But I like to make sure that everyone understands exactly what it is that I'm trying to convey. withcheese blathers on and on just so he can hear himself talk. There's a big difference between the two.
You're an idiot. That's not what she meant. CuckingFunt was saying that you are always lauding your own ideas as if they are absolute truth. You seem to think that everything you say is right, and everything anyone else says is wrong. It's actually called self-aggrandizement, but you wouldn't know anything about that, now would you?
bull .
she was wrong. thats clear to everyone except her dumb ass who cant help lying to herself because shes desperately trying not to be a . i was just calling her out on it, just like you would ing do if you saw some talking a bunch of bull all over the place
and wouldnt it be ing great if you were me? i mean, youd finally have a big to replace that gaping pussy gash between your legs. youd also have the opportunity to not me a middle-aged virgin. youd be ing smart to, which would be just such a pleasant surprise for everyone around here.
go find your own thread to post in ...start a louis vs. the trolls thread and see how quickly your ass gets plastered
this thread is about ME! recognize that and leave it alone
i though impersonating norcal was bad, but youve sunk to new lows with this bull . louis is possible the most re ed person of all time next to awmyplace. and you actually waste your time pretending to be him. what does that say about you?
what the is that depressed smileycon supposed to mean? your depressed that i just tore your asshole open to expose your innards to the harsh cold world and then ed on your face, a combination of creamy man seed and your own corn-and-parisite infested , then made you eat it? because thats what i have done to you in this thread...metaphorically
you lose...i win...deal with it
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It was at this point I started a new thread outing all of my trolls and triumphantly announcing to the world that, yes, indeed, conqueso is withcheese. A poignant moment of pure elation swept through the troll forum at that moment, and the adulation was expressed by all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
thanks
Now its going to take a LOT to convince me that you aren't actually CuckingFunt.
Exactly my point!!!
Finally someone realizes how wonderful I am!!
I have found a new sig...
Quit catchin' Media farts, Mid.
#5
(part II)
here's my response:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
riiiiiiiiiight.
FACTS:
1) you have a ty looking woman licking her -red lips in your avatar
2) your le is "linger ficking" good, an obvious reference to the sweet taste of med
3) you screen name is a variation of " ing "
4) you frequently engage in frank, unabashed discussions about sexual topics
each of those facts has significant and overt sexual innuendos.
you might not be actively TRYING to act ty, it might not be your gimik or your shtick or whatever, but you absolutely cannot deny that gratuitous sexuality and lewd, lacivious, lisentiousness is slathered all over your online iden y.
and that makes you a .
not in real life. but definitely in the IMAGE you portray.
now suck my like a good little
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=171
look at that scathing ing rebuke!!!! and her response?
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=187
ahem..."[I love] [d]irty, kinky, perverted, rough, nasty sex." Let me repeat that with bigger letters:
cuckingfunt: "[I love] [d]irty, kinky, perverted, rough, nasty sex."
let's remember that for later.
notice also how she misunderstands my argument...i didn't say she WAS a , I said she ACTED like a on this message board, that she has a ty persona. big difference, but apparently a difference she cannot comprehend.
my response:
dirty kinky perverted rough nasty sex = lewd, lacivious, licentious = ty
open in sexuality (different from dirty kinky perverted rough and nasty) =/= ty
now, that wasnt too hard to understand now, was it?
apparently it was:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=197
wait, so when I said "'open in with their sexuality' DOES NOT EQUAL lewd, lacivious, lisentious behavior" that WASN'T a response?
who the ARE you? I mean seriously you are just really dumb. you said i didnt respond when i just gave you a HARDCORE response showing you why all the things you just said were ing illogical. wake the up!
here is the clincher...i'll requote cf's original post just so everyone can grasp the full magnitude of the ownage here:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=202
that is so clearly true that it doesnt really need an explication, other than this graph:
cuckingfunt says: lewd behavior does not equal
withcheese proves: lewd behavior equals
cucking funt: wrong again (what is that, like 5 now? 5 or 6, i've ing lost count)
so how does cf respond?
she says this despite the fact that a) i'm not saying she IS, i'm saying she ACTS, and b) SHE'S GOT THE ING DEFINTION OF DISSOLUTE RIGHT IN FRONT OF HER ING FACE. It means licentious which means "sexually unrestrained." Dirty, kinky, perverted, rough, and nasty sex sounds pretty sexually unrestrained to me and everyone else in the entire universe. it's also pretty lewd. THERE- ING-FORE, IT IS DISSOLUTE. YOU ARE WRONG.
or as i so eloquently put it in my post to this thread:
Ten. Or eleven...maybe twelve? i dont know, but thats a lot of ing wrongness on cf's part.
no ...i wasn't trying to prove that you were a . I was trying to prove that you ACT like a (what is that, the five hundreth time i've had to say that?) not that you ARE a . Jesus ING Christ. im about to have a breakdown here. you devaluing the train of ing EQUALITIES by harping on the ing immorality is almost personally offensive, but is certainly offensive to the english language and all english speaking people in the entire world. here's what cucking funt just said "even though these things are ing EQUATED in the dictionary, i say they don't apply to me because i'm not dissolute, even though you just proved it to me with the definition that I ignored on purpose to save my ego." you SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!!!!!
as i eloquently said here:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=230
haduken. oh, and I love this response:
for one thing that second inequality might or might not be true...of course no one is ever going to call themself immoral or dissolute... ing HITLER remained obstinate to the end. even if you were the loosest ing in the entire world, you probably wouldnt admit it. your just that much of a .
for another thing, and i've now said this two hundred and fifty million times, is that im not saying you ARE a , im saying you ACT like a . i think its important to hilite this to the forum so that everyone realizes how many times i had to say this before that DUMB ING realized what i was saying SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!
sorry got a little out of hand there. this is turning into a meltdown. it, here's what i said to that dumb ass er:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=235
goddamn i'm smooth.
lies. i also proved this was wrong. remember the "dirty kinky perverted rough nasty sex" thing? saying that your all about that is ING DISSOLUTE...BY ING DEFINITION. you suck your a . your probably going to come back and respond to this gigantic post by saying that "oh look, i made you spend so much time repsonding to me, your my , look how mad you got." that's a bull reponse. your and idiot. i hate you, and im not your , i just LOVE proving you wrong it makes me feel so happy and wonderful i just med in my pants. NEXT!
see? SEE WHAT I MEAN?!?!?!
i'll just let the responses speak for themselves:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=246
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=247
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=257
her idiocy revealed:
that pretty much sums it up. twelve, thirteen, fourteen and fifteen.
then:
for real...this does not know the difference between a "necessary" and "sufficient" condition...and she has the ing AUDACITY to call ME ignorant.
all right , get your ass ready cause im about to learn you somethin:
a NECESSARY condition a cause that MUST be there for the effect to exist. like for the effect to be "receiving a blow job from cucking funt," a necessary conditions are that a) i have a which will fit in your mouth and b) your mouth is free and clear of all other s that may have penetrated it recently. now obviously you couldnt handle my rock hard in your mouth AND you literally live off of sucking so you wouldnt be able to blow mine, so that couldnt happen because the NECESSARY conditions for it to happen cannot exist.
a SUFFICIENT condition is one that is enough alone to cause an effect, but is not the only thing in the mother ing world that will cause it. for instance, immorality with a ...if your a sexually immoral woman, boom, your a . but even if you aren't sexually immoral, you can still be a . that what the ing word MEANS. DO you finally understand this now ?!>!?>!?!>?! oh, and by the way:
suck on THAT !!!!11!!!!! THE WHOLE THING is moot because if your lewd then your licentious and lascivious which makes you ING IMMORAL!!!!! Face the facts you dirty , your a , and no amount of skeezy underhanded bull is going to allow you to escape from that brand of iniquity. .
skipping a few of her more meaningless posts, we see this:
that stings!!
twenty twenty-one twenty-two
i think that pretty much sums things up...she just made a patently ABSURD comment and has shown that shes just spewing out of her mouth for the sake of being contentious. she doesnt have any idea what shes saying. its ALL wrong. and she's doing it again now!!!! dont let her fool you. she's let some time dull the memory of the dim wits in the forum about what actually happened in this thread and is trying to convince everyone that she didnt get her ass seriously stomped. but i will not let her perptrate such an injustice on the troll forum....i am looking out for all of you, making sure that no one does you wrong. cucking funt is trying to you, but i'm not going to let her.
here's an example of her making up pretend argument that even SHE is not stupid enough to acutally believe:
woah!!!! what a MORON! watch:
duh...she still keeps trying to pull it back to her BEING a so she'll have something to sanctimoniously deny. but she just doesn't GET IT. it's not about her, or anyone else, BEING a . it's about her ACTING like a . jesus ING christ!!!
and guess what?!?!?! she finally admitted her error:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...&postcount=319
can you ing believe it?!?!?!?! she admitted she was WRONG!!!!!!!!! stop the ing presses, we got a new headline!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
then, as a pentultimate dying gasp, she says this, and I respond:
...just as we can look over this entire post and see what's up. that's right, 13 pages worth of ownage. 25 or 26 instances of cucking funt being in error. jesus. and finally, he last breath before dying:
wow, now she's starting to talk like johnny blaze...heaven help her!!! but I remain on top of things, nailing her coffin shut with this gem:
her response????????? NONE.
this was the final straw...she couldn't handle being proven wrong for what, the twenty-seventh time? she had to leave, HAD to, or else her ego would have collapsed under the sheer force of my smack talking will and she would have been thrust into a catatonic state of smacked down syndrom from which she would never recover.
hope all of this was good for a laugh cucking funt. it sure made me feel good to bask in the warmth of my triumph once again. maybe if your lucky i'll deign myself to you and your miserable little life will be compltete.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
After this complete genocide of all CuckingFuntians, conqueso reappeared and started chiding withcheese, an exchange which could be considered a whole separate trolling and will end up playing an important role in their “battle” “against” each “other” later on. Apparently, I referred to CF as a “ ” 33 separate times in these annotations to the argument. I think that’s probably a record.
i couldnt live in a city where a raper was the best player
The media loves you guys!
What you talkin about?
They know that circus is good for 50 stories every NBA season.
"Oh, look at Paris at the Lakers game!" "Oops. Jerry Buss caught drinking and driving, pants down, 19 year old girl riding shotgun, in more ways than one." "Khlomar." "Kobe, Kobe, Kobe, and some more Kobe."
Ad infinitum.
I could see your point if the media manufactured these stories. But that isn't true. The Lakers do all the building and the media just slaps on a coat of hyperbole.
No, we already have enough fat cholo Laker t-shirt fans here.
You accepted Rodman like he was the second coming, you can brook a rapist.
I'll go all day, nocker. You can try me.
The is all that above?
down goes luva, once again.
Oh, Mid starting shovelin' his dirt into my yard and I just started shovelin' it back into his.
His light is out now, his mother probably put him down for a nap.
Didn't they fall in love with Lloyd Daniels...another world class citizen...
You gd rights, Med.
Their s stinks just like everybody elses.
Someone has wayyyyyyyyyyyyy too much time and energy on here.... damn
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
