Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 151
  1. #76
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    It brings us back to the question of Ging's credibility.

  2. #77
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Do you have something more concrete you'd like to share?
    You made the assertion. I was asking you for something concrete.

    I don't know if he is or not. What evidence do you have?
    If you Googled him enough to find his speech, you already know -- but if you really need it:

    UN official says Israel's siege of Gaza breeds extremism and human suffering

    By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem

    Friday, 23 November 2007

    A senior United Nations official has issued an unprecedented appeal to British MPs to use their influence to try to alleviate the impact of "indiscriminate" and "illegal" Israeli sanctions in Gaza which display "profound inhumanity" and are "serving the agenda of extremists".

    In one of the strongest attacks on recent Israeli strategy issued by a senior international official, John Ging, Gaza's director of operations for the refugee agency UNRWA, said that "crushing sanctions" imposed since the Israeli cabinet declared the Strip a "hostile en y" in September had contributed to "truly appalling living conditions."

    Mr Ging said the measures had been justified as protection from what he fully acknowledged were rocket attacks "terrorising" the Israeli civilian population within range. The rockets have killed two people this year and injured 99 others. But citing cuts in fuel and planned cuts in electricity along with closures which have had "an atrocious" impact on Palestinian medical care, "destroyed" Gaza's economy and threatened already "Third World" water and sanitation, he told the Britain-Palestine group of MPs: "This presupposes that the civilian population are somehow more capable of stopping the rocket fire than the powerful military of the occupying power.

    "My message ... is that not only are these sanctions not working, but because of their profound inhumanity, they are counterproductive to their stated purpose and while Gaza is not yet an en y populated by people hostile to their neighbour, it inevitably will be if the current approach of collective punitive sanctions continues."

    Mr Ging, whose agency is responsible for 70 per cent of Gaza's 1.5 million population, said that over the past two years "every hopeful opportunity has been irrationally dashed and followed by even worse cir stances". He added that Gaza's civilian population expected more of Israel and the international community, who regularly expressed concern about their humanitarian plight but "to no avail".

    Mr Ging, whose message is reinforced by a letter warning of the "increasingly desperate situation" in Gaza from major aid agencies in today's Independent, said 649 Palestinians had been killed this year, including 63 children. The figure includes more than 330 killed in internal fighting.

    Mr Ging added that UNRWA was unable to provide more than 61 per cent of the necessary calories to refugees. "At present we do not have sufficient funding to provide just one high nutrient biscuit to 200,000 children in UN schools."

    Israeli officials cite signs of a decline in Hamas's popularity as evidence that the sanctions are working. But Mr Ging said the "human suffering and misery for the entire civilian population in Gaza was creating fertile ground for the extremists".

    The Israeli branch of Physicians for Human Rights says that 11 patients have died since last month because their treatment was blocked or delayed. At least 800 more are being denied treatment abroad.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...ng-760096.html

    That's a couple years old, but the most complete statement I have seen from him and subsequent quotes from him have been similar. I haven't seen any claims from Ging that Hamas is besieging Gaza at all. Please show me one, WC.

  3. #78
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Now he's the head on the UNRWA in Gaza. Do you think there's any chance Hamas still seizes aid?
    There is certainly a chance. Since Hamas is the elected government there, is any seizure or redistribution beyond its governmental powers? I personally don't know.

  4. #79
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    You made the assertion. I was asking you for something concrete.
    Sorry I don't have a press release stating why they have resumed shipments. All I have is Ging saying, while he was still just a senior official, that they wouldn't let the misdeeds of a few affect everyone in Gaza.

  5. #80
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    There is certainly a chance. Since Hamas is the elected government there, is any seizure or redistribution beyond its governmental powers? I personally don't know.
    The UN certainly thought so.

  6. #81
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Sorry I don't have a press release stating why they have resumed shipments. All I have is Ging saying, while he was still just a senior official, that they wouldn't let the misdeeds of a few affect everyone in Gaza.
    So you have nothing but your assumption.

    That's what I thought.

    The UN certainly thought so.
    Thought what?

    Were they right or wrong?

  7. #82
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    So you have nothing but your assumption.

    That's what I thought.
    What do you have other than a le to a speech you haven't heard?

    Thought what?

    Were they right or wrong?
    The UN certainly thought it was beyond their (Hamas) powers.

  8. #83
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    What do you have other than a le to a speech you haven't heard?
    now you are the one who isn't reading articles. There wasn't even a link to follow to read the entire thing. Classic.

    The UN certainly thought it was beyond their (Hamas) powers.
    Were they correct in thinking that?

  9. #84
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    now you are the one who isn't reading articles. There wasn't even a link to follow to read the entire thing. Classic.
    Oh my bad. I didn't realize that article was his speech.

    Were they correct in thinking that?
    According to whom?

  10. #85
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Oh my bad. I didn't realize that article was his speech.
    It isn't. That is your bad. Besides that, what are you not understanding here?

    According to whom?
    According to the law in Gaza. You know, where Hamas is the government and where the aid was.

  11. #86
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    I wonder if you realize how good a poster you'd be if you weren't such a troll.

  12. #87
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    I wonder if you realize how good a poster you'd be if you weren't such a troll.
    According to whom?

  13. #88
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    You made the assertion. I was asking you for something concrete.
    But your were saying he says Israel is to blame.
    If you Googled him enough to find his speech, you already know -- but if you really need it:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...ng-760096.html

    That's a couple years old, but the most complete statement I have seen from him and subsequent quotes from him have been similar. I haven't seen any claims from Ging that Hamas is besieging Gaza at all. Please show me one, WC.
    Yes, I saw that. Yet since the elections, Hamas has completely taken over Gaza, by force at several times even.

    Didn't you know about the civil war between Hamas and Fatah? That's what I take the "medieval siege" to be.

    This is a little over a year old, but shows his past words don't mean much:

    Israel’s Humanitarian Aid in Gaza :
    In preparation for the coming operation, The Israeli government sent 90 trucks worth of humanitarian aid goods into Gaza on Friday, December 26. Israel has been working around the clock with international and private aid organizations to ensure that the Palestinian civilians in Gaza are receving the food and medical supplies that they need.

    On December 29 alone, Israel sent 63 trucks (1,545 tons) of humanitarian aid goods into the Gaza Strip including rice, yeast, flour, sugar and 64 tons of medical supplies. On December 31, 98 trucks and 2,366 tons of food and supplies were delivered in Gaza. On January 5, 80 trucks delivered goods to the area. On January 6, 49 trucks were sent into Gaza by means of the humanitarian unit of the IDF. 100 trucks and 500,000 liters of diesel fuel were sent in through the Kerem Shalom crossing on January 7.

    Additionally, hundreds of thousands of liters of diesel fuel were pumped into Gaza on January 6 including fuel for the Gaza power station, UN facilities and domestic cooking fuel.

    On Monday, January 12, Israeli security forces at the Kerem Shalom crossing caught a truck trying to smuggle electronic equipment into Gaza including infra-red cameras and computers. Electric equipment is not considered part of humanitarian aid although Israel has allowed certain electronics into Gaza in order to correct the city's electricity grid. As of January 15, Gaza's power grid was at 74% working capacity, up from 40% at the beginning of the operation.

    On January 14 an El Al jumbo plane filled with 100 tons of medical and food supplies from UNICEF landed at Ben Gurion airport.

    On Thursday, January 15, 170 trucks of humanitarian aid as well as 195,000 liters of fuel were sent into the area and on January 16, 135 truckloads were delivered. On these days combined, 3,790 tons of supplies were sent into Gaza.
    So many truckloads of aid have been sent in, in fact, that the World Food Programme took a two day recess from its food donations. The organization resumed its deliveries on Tuesday, January 6. The Gaza food warehouses are filled to capacity and are capable of lasting the citizens two weeks.
    On January 6 it was discovered that Hamas gunmen had opened their own hospital and were stealing a significant portion of medical supplies from the trucks that deliver humanitarian aid daily into Gaza. The medicine, of course, is intended for civilian hospitals and emergency medical care. By doing this Hamas is, yet again, denying its own civilian population the supplies that it desperately needs.

    Similarly, Hamas gunmen are hiding themselves in civilian hospitals, particularly among the various maternity wards, attempting to find refuge from Israeli fire. This is just one more example showing that Hamas truly takes its people’s safety for granted.

    For more on Hamas’s abuse of its citizens please see Hamas’s Human Shields

    Although Israeli officials realize that Hamas is preventing aid supplies from reaching its intended point of delivery, on January 7 Israel began a “humanitarian recess” in which the IDF and IAF would stop its operation for three hours daily so that Gaza’s citizens could safely go into the streets to collect food and medical goods. Hamas gunmen were the first on January 7 to end the temporary ceasefire, firing dozens of rockets at Israel’s southern towns. The Israeli-enforced humanitarian corridors have continued each day as scheduled despite Hamas's refusal to cease rocket fire on the western Negev during the three-hour ceasefire.

    On January 15, Israel decided to lengthen its daily humanitarian recess to four hours instead of three in order to allow more Gazans to get the supplies that they need. The decision to increase the time span of the pause came from Israel Joint Humanitarian Coordination Center (JHCC).
    Israel has made it clear that this operation is against Hamas armed forces and terrorist cells - not Palestinian civilians. The Israel Defense Forces is doing everything in their power to minimize the number of civilian casualties. The IDF has gone so far as to call apartment complexes in the Gaza Strip that are known to house Hamas forces and warn the civilian residents of coming airstrikes, allowing them enough time to evacuate the buildings. These warnings are given despite the fact that they tip off Hamas operatives.

    While the Arab world might like to deny it, the Israel Defense Forces are conducting their operation in as humane a way as possible by both limiting civilian casualties and offering an extreme humanitarian aid effort in Gaza. Hamas, on the other hand, denies its own people aid and infringes on their security.
    Tensions continued to rise as Hamas and Fatah both pled with the international community not to give money to the other organization. Hamas does not want to give Mahmoud Abbas more power and the PA wishes to retain Hamas's weakened state. The organizations are fighting for control of Gaza including the authority to rebuild the area's infrastructure.
    Israel is helping the people caught in the middle of this. At the same time trying to stop the attacks on their country.

  14. #89
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    It isn't. That is your bad. What are you not understanding here?
    I'm not understanding how you think you've contributed anything to support your point. You referenced a speech from 2010 you hadn't heard nor read. To try and rectify it you post an article from 3 years ago even though "in 2010" is in the le of the speech you referenced. When I point out the man who made the speech has been ok with Hamas stealing thousands of tons of aid for the people of Gaza, you do circles.

    According to the law in Gaza. You know, where Hamas is the government and where the aid was.
    Are you serious?

  15. #90
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    Pretty much everyone

  16. #91
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    According to the law in Gaza. You know, where Hamas is the government and where the aid was.
    Hmmm....

    they lied to the people to get power, so the people try to take back the government, but are subdued by them.

    I would say the people are under siege by Hamas.

  17. #92
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    It doesn't even matter how they came to power. He's actually asking if Hamas has made it ok for Hamas to seize aid.


  18. #93
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    But your were saying he says Israel is to blame.
    Yes, that is what I am saying because that is what he said.

    Didn't you know about the civil war between Hamas and Fatah? That's what I take the "medieval siege" to be.
    That's because you're an idiot.

  19. #94
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    I hear Kim Jong Il has made it legal to kill people for speaking out against his government. I guess the UN would be "incorrect" if they said that wasn't ok to do.

  20. #95
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    They should probably elect a group that doesn't fire missles and use their own people as human shields.


    Knowing this is one thing, but seeing it animated...

    How can these lib s be Hamas apologists. They make me sick. If I could revoke their citizenship and send them to Gaza, I would.

  21. #96
    United Autodidact Society Shastafarian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    8,321
    The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) on Friday said it is suspending humanitarian aid in Gaza until further notice, after Hamas seized control of its warehouses and stole 200 tons of food and supplies...

    A UN spokesman on Wednesday said Hamas police in Gaza broke into a warehouse full of UN humanitarian supplies and seized thousands of blankets and food packages, creating a rare public clash between the international agency that feeds much of the territory and the militant group that rules it...

    "Hamas policemen stormed into an aid warehouse in Gaza City Tuesday evening and confiscated 3,500 blankets and over 400 food parcels ready for distribution to 500 families," said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness on Wednesday.

    "They were armed, they seized this, they took it by force," Gunness said, terming the incident absolutely unacceptable.
    From Wild Cobra's original link.


  22. #97
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    I'm not understanding how you think you've contributed anything to support your point. You referenced a speech from 2010 you hadn't heard nor read. To try and rectify it you post an article from 3 years ago even though "in 2010" is in the le of the speech you referenced. When I point out the man who made the speech has been ok with Hamas stealing thousands of tons of aid for the people of Gaza, you do circles.
    I mentioned what the le of his speech was, and then posted the most complete article i could find that articulated his views -- which to my understanding have not changed. Have you found any evidence that his views have changed?

    Post them.

    Are you serious?
    Actually, yes. I am not saying this is the reason the UN now says there were no thefts -- merely that it could be a possible explanation. As we currently have no hard evidence why shipments resumed, it seems to be that a clarification of Hamas' right to redistribute aid is as valid a theory as your assumption.

    I am certainly open to the possibility that neither is correct.

  23. #98
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    From Wild Cobra's original link.
    That aid was seized is not in question.

  24. #99
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    I hear Kim Jong Il has made it legal to kill people for speaking out against his government. I guess the UN would be "incorrect" if they said that wasn't ok to do.
    You can disagree with a law. It's still the law.

  25. #100
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    If the UN merely decided it's ok for Hamas to continue seizing aid, that's what happened.

    Is that what happened?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •