Reply With Quote
Why would they? "Here, take our starting small forward and here's 3 mil to boot."
Think ducks.
The Nets would only use up 3.4 million in cap space in a deal like Bruno suggested. They would still have enough to max out LeBron.
Why would they? "Here, take our starting small forward and here's 3 mil to boot."
Think ducks.
I doubt New Jersey would want to commit 8 million a year on Jefferson, if they signed Bron. They already have Williams as a very capable back up.
They might not have to, but if the options for the Spurs are letting RJ walk for nothing, or throwing a little money at another team in order to get a crucial trade exception, they might choose the latter.
Jefferson and James plays the same spot. It's more realist Jefferson is their Plan B if James goes elsewhere
I like bruno's deal a lot, but i think Jay Z and Prokhorov efforts could very well pay off. So a deal with the knicks and D'Antoni is more probable in my eyes
They have money. FAs will go where the money is to get paid. This shouldn't be a hard concept to understand.
ofcourse I'm starting to like the trade exemption now, could go after a restricted FA like Josh Childress.
Or someone like Travis Outlaw who is young and still has a lot of upside.
What kind of shape do you think Bruce Bowen is in?
S&t for Chandler?
or use that TE on someone like Kyle Korver, Mike Miller.
Also another question, can a TE be split between 2 players? or only used on one?
Well, you can also add Gee and Temple to the trade to create a bigger TE but Spurs may want to keep some of Gee/Temple/Hairston/Jerrels.
You can also imagine a 3 way trade.
Spurs get Humphries + a SF + $3M for RJ + Hairston + Jerrells
Nets get RJ + Hairston + Jerrells fro Humphries + $3M
3rd team get TE for a SF.
Add picks to balance the trade.
In that scenario and with RJ starting salary at $6.6M, Spurs can get a SF paid $7.2M.
A TE can be split.
TimVP predicts quite well usually ( cf last Mavs playoff series ), what would you predict TIMVP ? A trade exception from the nets ? And what player could you see us get with it ?
And just a few days ago there were dreams of Rudy Gay....
wow RJ continues to piss off spurs fans....
A sign and trade for a trade exception is pretty much a best case scenario since opted out. I'd love to do it without taking Humphries, but if that's what the Nets want, Spurs gotta play ball to get that exception.
I actually like Humphries, seems like a spur
Who here would take on Curry's contract to get Chandler from the Knicks?
to get the other team to do a sign and trade think aggie think aggie
The only player I like from NJ is Damion James
not my the smarter spur fans
they knew he would be to much but not the max
They can have all of those guys if they want them. Fine by me. D-leaguers are a dime a dozen.
The problem is that the Nets don't have a lot of player's under contract. So, this would all be dependent upon a guy like Humphries (for example) agreeing to a S&T because he doesn't think he could do better on the open market.
Terrence Williams isn't bad as a backup SF, has a decent contract and the Spurs could use the TE to find a starter.
I agree, although at 3M he becomes the 5th big and almost eliminates any chance of Bonner returning.
Humphries already picked up his option, he's under contract.
Humphries isn't a FA.
Nets are under the cap, they don't need to match salaries.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions