Well Splitter is a 7 foot center, Jefferson is plenty big for a SF not a small ball PF like we tried last season. Obviously a backup SF with size is the next priority.
As I wrote somewhere else, this current Spurs roster is simply too short to compete.
1. No true Centers. All of our bigs are actually PF's.
2. Our SF's are all 6'6"-7" rather than the 6'8"-9" that the best teams have.
3. Hill is too short to be a SG, but he will play minutes there.
4. Who is going to guard the bigs with a low post game? We have no Kurt Thomas type big who can body up strong C's. Fortunately there aren't many left in the WC.
5. Add all this to the fact that Pop often plays small ball lineup.
Well Splitter is a 7 foot center, Jefferson is plenty big for a SF not a small ball PF like we tried last season. Obviously a backup SF with size is the next priority.
15 man roster:
Parker, Hill, Temple
Manu, Anderson, Hairston
RJ, ..., ...
Splitter, McDyess, Bonner
Duncan, Blair, ...
I'm sorry, but I don't think the Spurs can depend on Jerrells, Gee, and Richards to fill those three spots. And the LLE is still there. So they need to use it, or make a trade, or something.
The offseason shouldn't be over just yet.
Nice post, Im hoping that Bonner did not receive a raise and the contract is much less. Than hopefully we can land a defensive/shooter 3.
Jerrells won't make the club. One of Hairston/Gee won't make the club. AFAIK, Richards' Euro club has not released him from his contract, the reason he isn't playing SL. That's three spots up for grabs, as far as I'm concerned.
I also don't think there is any way in RJ gets 5 years. His little foray into free agency this summer should have snapped his head back about his value and demand in the league.
Jerrells ($762k) won't make the club - Probably right
Hairston or Gee ($762k) won't make the club - again probably right
Richards ($473k) doesn't make the club - sounds reasonable to me
The point is assuming RJ get a starting salary of around $6M (doesn't matter how many years)...spurs will have $2M to spend on those three positions total. NBA minimum salaries range from $473k for a rookie to about $1.3M (12 year vet). You can replace any of those three guys with any non-impact players or alternate spurs you like (gist or whoever) and stick them on the toros roster.
If there is a trade to be had who knows, I am sure Buford and Pop will continue their search, otherwise we kind of got what we got.
Another alternative is to not keep two of our roster spots and we may be able to use the bi-annual exception.
I have finally come to believe that Hairston will make the club and actually play significant minutes at the SF slot. This change of thinking is a direct result of him not being on the SL roster. Good or bad I believe he will get his chance this year.
We must sign a SF who can shot. I'd be happy with Butler or Jones .
It sure looks that way. Options dwindling fast.
Bell and JJones are all that's left it looks like unless you can get an injured Harrington for the LLE.
Last edited by montgod; 07-10-2010 at 06:58 PM.
About July 1, mysanantonio.com had the FO going after Matt Barnes.![]()
Matt Barnes?
We've gone after Matt before and I believe he said he has no interest in playing for the Spurs.
I hope were not done, we still need another 3pt shooting SF.
Jesus Christ almighty this team is glaringly weak now.
any hope i had for the upcoming season went down the tubes with the matt bonner signing. i'm predicting a second round exit again - probably lose out to OKC or Portland.
what are the odds bonner plays more minutes than any other big (other than duncan) next season? i'm betting 50/50.
Good post. I agree, I think they're done.
They may have wanted a more proven backup option at SF, but with the money bring thrown around (for example, Wright signed today for 3 years/$11 million), the Spurs simply can't afford that type of player.
They could sign a minimum type, but what's the point? Those players aren't clear cut upgrades over Hairston and Gee. Both of whom the Spurs are high on, have experience in the system, are young, athletic and inexpensive.
Not only that, but a minimum type signing would put them past the luxury tax threshold. I can't see them doing that for anything less than a clear cut, substantial upgrade.
I also expect Jerrells to be waived to create more breathing room under the tax, free up a roster spot (gives the team flexibility throughout the year in case injuries decimate a certain position) and also because I don't see any conceivable role for him.
Now you understand...
I keed I keed..
As you know well...I agree to this..
I always did understand, I just wasn't in agreement with forgoing signing a veteran SF...until Anderson fell into the Spurs laps (not that he fell that far). Anderson is a good three point shooter and ready to play immediately by all accounts, so there's no need to waste money and pay the tax for a similar, but older and less athletic, minimum type player.
I agree.
I've been advocating this scenario for a while now.
I don't think Shaq necessarily left Miami last time on great terms. I'm not even sure Riley would want to put up with his crap again.
I'm not sure we want to put up with his crap either.
Is Jefferson officially signed or not? Just wondering.
Sounds like everybody else might be.
Nobody is. I would probably suspect that we will hear official signings of Bonner,Splitter and RJ by early this week. Splitter and Bonner almost certainly Monday.
Done or not, they've at least got their core piece back in the fold...
![]()
We will pick up Rasual Butler is my feeling. He'll be the starting SF.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)