Where to start with that abomination of bad logic?
1) Please provide some support to the statement "the majority of americans" think that the mosque is some sort of "victory shrine".
2) "the only thing that explains" is easily countered, simply by listing the entirely plausible and reasonable factors given for the decision.
3) Since you have stated that "it is the only thing that explains" you have inherently stated that it is some sort of "victory mosque".
Please provide proof of this statement of motive. Since you have asserted this motive, you MUST provide sufficient proof.
If you cannot, then you have proven to be exactly the kind of xenophobe the big bad liberals claim you to be. Your statements here provide some fair proof of that, so I will point right back to this when WC or Darrin or who ever starts crying crocodile tears about being called an islamophobic bigot.
Lastly, if we use your logic of history being a guide to the future, should we expect
protestants and catholics to start massacring each other by the millions if they live too close to each other?
The above link glosses over some rather brutal reprisals, including the mass execution of entire towns by one army or another.
If you wish to use history in support of your illogical assertions and beliefs, you will continue to be hoisted by your own pe .
Your logic also allows me to easily mention that
similar histories are often cited when muslims talk about the bloodthristy warlike christians.
Need I go on?
If you cannot provide proof to really support your statements, then we can all safely assume that you are, yet again, talking out your ass.
Reply With Quote
