Spurs vs. top contenders, and why they have a chance.

[Man In Black]

Do you even post anything other than non-sense that continuing gets you owned?

I answered a question you posed and then I asked you a relevant question in return, and what did you do? You asked Spurs Fan for help by starting a thread.
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162175


That is the very definition of getting owned. RECOGNIZE!

[2Cleva]

Ya'll can't handle the truth.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162251

[Ace]

I answered a question you posed and then I asked you a relevant question in return, and what did you do? You asked Spurs Fan for help by starting a thread.
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162175


That is the very definition of getting owned. RECOGNIZE!

I've answered your question just took a different approach so even you would understand that I'm not trolling. Your just a bigger homer than I thought and still really believe that Manu is better than Wade which laughable itself. Now I just can't take you serious.

[Man In Black]

I've answered your question just took a different approach so even you would understand that I'm not trolling. Your just a bigger homer than I thought and still really believe that Manu is better than Wade which laughable itself. Now I just can't take you serious.

In other words, I kicked your ass up and down this message board so instead of continuing the debate, you've raised the white flag and surrendered? Yeah I thought so.

If you're thinking that I'm just a homer and what I post is bull conjecture, just like you ALWAYS DO, well then..if I post that this part from a national magazine:

SG Manu Ginobili
Manu continues to get the short shrift, despite his enduring popularity, because he plays so few minutes per game. But when you balance his overall efficiency and pace? He's just a small step behind Kobe Bryant. If not even with him.

Did you see the name Wade up there? I didn't. Now, I've given you stats, I've pointed out that if Wade was so good, then why didn't he defend Manu. I then pointed out his last game against Miami where he kills Wade & Company by himself, with no Parker and Duncan not scoring 1 point until the 2nd half.

You want to beat me? Then give us FACTS, not conjecture. If you just avoid me, then it's like I said. You've raised the white flag. I get that a lot from posters who want to battle me. Here's my flag->

[Ace]

How can anyone take you serious if you really believe that? Manu, at one point in his career I would say was the better of the two, but at this point its not debatable. Stop trying to compare the two from the 2 games they play a season. If you really want to compare who's better then you would look at season stats. You keep saying I gave up like your begging me to.

[ohmwrecker]

In how many threads are the two of you engaged in the same argument?

[Ace]

In how many threads are the two of you engaged in the same argument?

Not really much of a argument as its not a debatable subject, but one to many.

[chazley]

Not really much of a argument as its not a debatable subject, but one to many.

You've been dominated and humiliated every time you post.

Now ask another rhetorical question.

[chazley]

And just for some reference.. Wade is without a doubt my favorite NBA player not in a Spurs uniform, and his dominance in the 06 Finals is the greatest performance in a series I have ever witnessed. I literally own 2 jerseys, a Manu jersey and Wade's. Again, he is the better player, but Manu can match him for 1 or 2 games or even outplay him. I don't see how you cannot accept that that may be a possibility.

[Ace]

You've been dominated and humiliated every time you post.

Now ask another rhetorical question.

I've owned both you and Man In Black so bad that's actually sad. Your just to stupid to realize you've been owned. , you even think you didn't get owned in the Mason thread and when every Spurs fan was laughing at your stupidity. Now move along kiddo

[Man In Black]

I've owned both you and Man In Black so bad that's actually sad. Your just to stupid to realize you've been owned. , you even think you didn't get owned in the Mason thread and when every Spurs fan was laughing at your stupidity. Now move along kiddo

Man...you're just like a Laker bandwagon fan. I know more about his team than he does, and I own you too....You guys have a bad habit of being PREMATURE.

Get back to it...Let's battle preemie boy! And just so you stop embarassing yourself, in proper context, you're TOO much of an IDIOT for you to understand. But hey, I'll oblige, if you want a continual ass-kicking. You might have some people follow you. even sequ and ducks have followers.

[Ace]

And just for some reference.. Wade is without a doubt my favorite NBA player not in a Spurs uniform, and his dominance in the 06 Finals is the greatest performance in a series I have ever witnessed. I literally own 2 jerseys, a Manu jersey and Wade's. Again, he is the better player, but Manu can match him for 1 or 2 games or even outplay him. I don't see how you cannot accept that that may be a possibility.

Point is Wade is the better player, but you butt buddy thinks otherwise. Your also the idiot who thinks Hill can guard Wade. Spurs have no answer for LeBron and apparently neither do you. LeBron can dominate a series far better than Tim can at this point in their respective careers.

[Ace]

Man...you're just like a Laker bandwagon fan. I know more about his team than he does, and I own you too....You guys have a bad habit of being PREMATURE.

Get back to it...Let's battle preemie boy! And just so you stop embarassing yourself, in proper context, you're TOO much of an IDIOT for you to understand. But hey, I'll oblige, if you want a continual ass-kicking. You might have some people follow you. even sequ and ducks have followers.

Go back to the other thread, your already getting bukkaked there and there's no need for it here too.

[chazley]

Point is Wade is the better player, but you butt buddy thinks otherwise. Your also the idiot who thinks Hill can guard Wade. Spurs have no answer for LeBron and apparently neither do you. LeBron can dominate a series far better than Tim can at this point in their respective careers.

Again, all you do is say rhetorical questions. Quote one instance in this thread where you have 'owned' me, and ill give you three more.

[Ace]

Again, all you do is say rhetorical questions. Quote one instance in this thread where you have 'owned' me, and ill give you three more.

Where was the question? I simply stated a fact.

[chazley]

You are quite possibly the worst poster of all time.

[Ace]

You are quite possibly the worst poster of all time.

Yet you and Man In Black are the only ones who think so. I can live with that being everyone else seems to think your an idiot and Man In Black is a homer. We'll see who's right in June and I'm willing to bet your not around for that.

[Ace]

Hill obviously has trouble defending quick pgs. That wont be a problem against heat or lakers. Hill has perfect body to defend a Wade, just needs to get it right mechanically and mentally.

[chazley]

Another quality post from Ace.

[BadOdor]

Another quality post from Ace.

Ace is right. Your post is absolutely laughable. Hill couldn't stay in front of nash, and you think he will somehow guard Wade, who is much faster and stronger than nash?

Yeah, good luck with that.

[chazley]

Ace is right. Your post is absolutely laughable. Hill couldn't stay in front of nash, and you think he will somehow guard Wade, who is much faster and stronger than nash?

Yeah, good luck with that.

First off, I'd love to see some actual numbers as to how much Hill actually guarded Nash when Parker is on the court. Not to mention, Nash killed whoever guarded him because we as a team couldn't stop the pick and roll with Nash/Stoudemire, who along with Malone/Stockton might've been the more devastating pick and roll partners of all time.

Second, Hill has the body to better defend a Wade than he does a Nash. Nash is more of a quirky, quick type, not to mention is quite possibly the best shooter in the NBA, where Wade has a much more traditional speed, even though he is deceptively quick, and lacks a consistent 3-pt shot.

People forget Nash is a first-ballot hall of famer and back-to-back MVP, who last season was arguably still in his prime.

[Ace]

First off, I'd love to see some actual numbers as to how much Hill actually guarded Nash when Parker is on the court. Not to mention, Nash killed whoever guarded him because we as a team couldn't stop the pick and roll with Nash/Stoudemire, who along with Malone/Stockton might've been the more devastating pick and roll partners of all time.

Second, Hill has the body to better defend a Wade than he does a Nash. Nash is more of a quirky, quick type, not to mention is quite possibly the best shooter in the NBA, where Wade has a much more traditional speed, even though he is deceptively quick, and lacks a consistent 3-pt shot.

People forget Nash is a first-ballot hall of famer and back-to-back MVP, who last season was arguably still in his prime.

Ok now you just made it obvious you don't watch basketball. Nash killed Hill and anyone watching would know how bad it was. Wade has traditional speed? Really? Yeah now I'm sure you just started watching basketball and don't really know much.

[chazley]

Ok now you just made it obvious you don't watch basketball. Nash killed Hill and anyone watching would know how bad it was. Wade has traditional speed? Really? Yeah now I'm sure you just started watching basketball and don't really know much.

Do you just sit around and wait for me to post something thoughtful, and then bash it to try and sound like you have a clue about basketball? How about you prove me wrong with facts or an informed opinion rather than just spewing your basketball-re edness all over my thread.

[cantthinkofanything]

Do you just sit around and wait for me to post something thoughtful, and then bash it to try and sound like you have a clue about basketball? How about you prove me wrong with facts or an informed opinion rather than just spewing your basketball-re edness all over my thread.

LMAO at "basketball-re edness".

[Rummpd]

the back and forth arguement is really pretty silly - if the Spurs got through the West (and it is not probable but certainly plausible) and if the Heat got by both the Magic and Celtics (another if that is more probable but not a lock) - it would be a whole Spurs team that had gelled and had an stout team exterior defense that put pressure on the ball; then funneled players to the timbers inside where this year Splitter and Duncan could well be again the "the Spurs line in the sand"

The bottom line = Hill is a fine defender, but no one can stop a Wade or James from going off if they are hot but they can be somewhat contained, and Hill/Manu/Parker/Duncan and Splitter can also be potentially very good offensively etc.

It would take a lot for this Spurs team to beat a young "stud" ridden team like the Heat - but who would have thought that when the Lakers had Malone, Payton, Byrant and Shaq that the Spurs would give them a serious scare (and might have beat them nigh a dubious 0.4 "miracle) and then the Pistons would finish them? NOTHING IN THE NBA IS A LOCK AND THE SPURS AND MANY OTHER TOP TIER TEAMS ARE NOT GOING TO STAND IN AWE AT THE HEAT's 2 superstars and the over-rated Bosh.

Bring on the season.