Only a moron would use the "rings argument."
It makes no sense to credit a team championship to an individual player.
That's it. And that's all.
Only a moron would use the "rings argument."
It makes no sense to credit a team championship to an individual player.
Sure. I got no problem with that. I had no problem with:::
Duncan: 4
Kobe: 3
I wanted 5-4 Kobe, but, I cited 4-3 Duncan, and soldiered on.
I'm fine and dandy, because I have:
Manu: 3
Zeke/Baylor: 1
It's just a mechanism for ball busting.
You all tortured us with it at 4-3 Duncan. It's only right & proper that we strip you down naked and do likewise at 5-4 Kobe.
Who's "Zeke" again?
Congratz to Manu.
and Congrats to Kobe for 1-upping Duncan.
Cully, based on your equation, does this work too?
Kobe 5
Spurs Franchise 4
Thus, Kobe > Spurs Franchise
I wasn't one of those wielding the whip, however.
I'm not a user of the rings argument.
I stay focused on the individual in these comparisons. Like Finals MVPs. And that count is at:::
Duncan: 3
Kobe: 2
Kobe: 5
Duncan: 4
Steve Garvey>Angels Franchise, if you want to play that game. He has more Pennants than the entire ty Angel franchise.
True, but, that one doesn't get their ire like:::
Kobe: 5
Duncan: 4
They absolutely loath that one. There are consequences & repercussions to winning an NBA World Championship.
Next time don't get skunked.
Mid, you're makin' an ass of yourself.
- "Go to lunch. Will you please go to lunch?"
- "Williamson" - "Glenngary Glennross"
Come on Sasha...
Spurs Franchise has a load more than Kobe. Add in Holt's rings, Popovich's assistants, bench players, the whole enchilada. Franchise is a business. Therefore all the rings won by the WHOLE franchise should count if you are going to throw in that word.
How? My Garvey example is consistent with your logic, as is Sandy Koufax>Cleveland Indians.
He can play that game if he wants. But if he is, he needs to understand and accept:::
Kirk Gibson: 2 rings.
ty Angels franchise: 1 ring
Thus, Kirk Gibson> ty Angel franchise.
Jesus, we took the pickle in the finest tradition at:::
Duncan: 4
Kobe: 3
And you guys were plain spoken and brief about it. No addendums, no qualifiers. Just pure:
Duncan: 4
Kobe: 3
![]()
What pickle did you take? You were ing around at Sose's joint when that pickle was being given. You only came 'round here when the going was good, when Kobe was knotted up at 4.
You have no place.
lol who the cared about kobe at the time except the kobe fan s that would try to bring him into the discussion. Shaq getting his 4th before Duncan was way more irksome
True.
But, I still took the pickle in essence.
& nonetheless whereas my Lakers Brothers suffer I suffer. Ipso facto when they were stripped naked, bent over and tossed said pickle. I was also done likewise.
- "And that hurts. I wasn't able to go to Flags the next day. I had to sit on a box of frozen peas all day."
- "Jennifer Chek" - "Jennifer's Body"
I call ass. You f'ers don't give two s about Daddy eclipsing Duncan. It's nothing but a ruse to put us off the scent of Kobe eclipsing not only Duncan, but, also Daddy. You f'ers don't like that one either. I've seen ya's sniffin' Daddy's blow hole.
Don't even start.
So, if Duncan beats Kobe in the WCF, and wins his 5th ring. Who is better? Kobe or Duncan?
^In that precise protocol::: Tim Duncan
Cause he ain't a Laker no more.
That's what this all about, has always been about. The Lakers. The best player on the Lakers will always be the biggest villain and subject to ridicule. In the halcyon 3 peat days, it was slights against Daddy's weight and at ude, and today, we're taking Kobe to task for all his deficiencies.
Just the way it works.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)