Isn't that the news org that gives you the 'right' news?
Why'd you switch screen names?
If one confuses approval rating polls with polls asking about votes, you deserve to wallow in the pool of your own stupidity.
Answer one question for me:
Do you seriously think people at, below or near the federal poverty level seriously believes that they would somehow be better off under a Republican president (other than a minority of "useful idiots")?
The Republican War on the Poor is pretty damned obvious to anybody with any common sense. The party of rich white people, by rich white people, and for rich white people isn't fooling anybody.
I take that back, come to think of it, they have fooled an awful lot of poor people who labor on the illusion that the fiscal conservatives give a about socially conservative issues. Sorry for the mistake.
this is what happens when u went for the combo breaker
I get tired of looking at the same name after a while. This is my homage to the Legend that is Emanuel.
Anyone who believes they will be better because of a specific politician is misguided. Obama fooled so many people, you can't help but laugh at them. I also couldn't hep but laugh at people who are are boasting about independents leaving The President, yet his most hopeful supporters are still suffering while he is out enjoying the good life.
War on the Poor? Life is a war on the poor. The strong eat the weak. LOL you thinking the poor can't get ahead because the dems aren't always there to pretend like they will wipe their ass everyday. I would hate to be so weak as to believe what you just stated RG. I'd feel like a ty parent if I was teaching my son that weak mentality.
No, because they're dumb enough to believe the following.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
@ the Dems successfully enslaving the hope and dignity of a majority of the poor and minorities for nothing more than votes to further their own careers. Intellectuals like RG are proud the poor feel they can't get ahead unless clowns like Obama are there to hold their hands and fight for them.
Ok, the dems did it.... I always thought you guys always blamed the individual... now today it's the dems, tomorrow the individual, the next day obama...
"The party of rich white people, by rich white people, and for rich white people isn't fooling anybody."
The Repug/VRWC bogusly "owning" anti-abortion, anti-gay, family values, "Christian" bull , and racism, Nat Sec (We Let 9/11 Happen!) completely fools the poor red-state bubbas into voting Repug because of those single issues when the Repugs don't do crap for them in return.
Our welfare state has done WONDERS for the poor.
"you guys"
You all say the Republicans don't give a about the common man. I agree with that 100%. Don't give a about me, just stay out of the way enough for us to do our thing in the bogus game. The problem with Dems is they pretend like they give a about you yet do the same as the reps only they want to bring down everyone in order to raise the poor up to everyone's level. Last I checked the bankers are raping the country and living outside of jail cells under the current administration. But but but they aren't reps, so the poor and minorities should feel content.
BINGO. The arrogant jackasses that did that in the last administration were basically appointed to do the same in this administration but a lot of people fail to see that. Enter the downtrodden.
Good thing the government is there to wipe their asses -- without fail, everyday.
No doubt, the misguided liberal crusade to alleviate poverty and human suffering can only detract from the noble work of propping up the criminal bankers, oligarchs and millionaires so essential to our economic well-being.
That is the crusade of liberals - not of liberal politicians. Let the house of cards collapse and rebuild.
brb the left helping out the poor and minorities
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...ilout-20110411
President Obama should lock down the entire fuarking government until the Fed is exposed for its bull . He won't.During the financial crisis, the Fed routinely made billions of dollars in "emergency" loans to big banks at near-zero interest. Many of the banks then turned around and used the money to buy Treasury bonds at higher interest rates — essentially loaning the money back to the government at an inflated rate. "People talk about how these were loans that were paid back," says a congressional aide who has studied the transactions. "But when the state is lending money at zero percent and the banks are turning around and lending that money back to the state at three percent, how is that different from just handing rich people money?"
Last edited by ManuBalboa; 04-14-2011 at 02:20 PM.
It has actually. If you knew all about poverty in the US in general over the last 50 years, you might know that.
uh-huh.
I have little doubt there are some self-serving Democrats in public office who give lip service to such things.
It must be nice to be dismissively cynical about *everything*. It would make life so much easier to wave people and ideas away without actually bothering to, you know, make the effort to actually find out what people are or think.
I may be an intellectual elitist, but I sure as glad I am not a lazy POS cynic.
This is a perfect example of the warped mindset of the wing brain.....they just keep compounding their own lies with even more lies even when faced with overwhelming facts to the contrary of the first lie, that is why the birther issue is big again with wing-nuts while everyone else is just shaking their heads going.... en nuts...
Over the years, its been a truly extra ordinary thing to watch....
the premise lie here being that all Liberals, or socialists, want a nanny state..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)