I like how everyone in that room is like "America, yeah!" while Hillary is sitting there over holding back tears because we just popped that SOB in the head.
I like how everyone in that room is like "America, yeah!" while Hillary is sitting there over holding back tears because we just popped that SOB in the head.
You know Pakistan is going to suffer for this, so let's not act like we showed be pushing them around because OBL was hiding there all along like everyone said he was for the last decade. No doubt, they allowed us to go in there, and even though we prolly had to pay a nice chunk of change - we were able to accomplish our business, while they have to worry about the mess afterwards.
Sure, they are s, but I'd rather cooperate with them than assholes.
She is likke that because the first helicopter went down
What a load of crap most of that is. If he had explosives strapped to him he would have detonated them before we got to him.
Pictures will be released, and in case you forgot we released picks of Saddam and his boys, as well as the other Osama kids we've popped already and other prominent AQ leaders whenever we could.
Exactly.
The US gave the Pakistanis 20 large to find bin Laden.
imo theres a conspiracy
usa and paki stage this and put this clown in there, put urself in OBL shoes, wouldnt you go out all guns of glory and planned for ur escape or if ima die i take all you along with me...so why wasnt his compound full of explosives..go out in a blaze of glory....and it didnt make sense less then 5 ppl was in his compound...
Perhaps not the absolute brightest post you have ever made, Ag.
Look again. Every single man and woman in that room is looking very serious. There is no "yeah, America" look on anyone's face, and for all you or I know, that photo was taken when the American helicopter went down and everybody there was worried about American casualties (as many of them said they were after the fact).
Hate on Hillary all you want...she is certainly no fave of mine...but that post was genuinely stupid.
Mindlessly repeating biased inferences ( Cheney) and completely un-sourced assertions (serial liar Marc Thiessen), has certain risks attached.
Hillary looks like she's gonna throw up, tbh
Out of respect for Islamic beliefs that a person must be buried within 24 hours, they buried him at sea. No country wanted him on their land, and if there is no land spot available immediately, then burial at sea is acceptable. The US obviously is taking great pains not to offend moderate Muslims.
I am not a military or intelligence buff at all, but I have found it very fascinating how evidence has been found and put together to figure this all out.
Someone asked about why did they not just bomb the place, but there was a lot of intelligence to be found in the compound, as well as being able to ID his body without a doubt.
i thought they had to wait 1week for t he dna results to come in...
Still waiting for my reward money.
The U.S. already had his family's DNA on file, so they were probably just looking for family markers.
Self-pwned by my speed reading. But it does raise an interesting hypothetical. The interogators didn't know (hindsight's always 20-20) that their conventional interrogation techniques produced actionable intel. But, if you were 100% certain that waterboarding would lead you to OBL, would you support it.
I already know where WineyHole and Lngrrr stand.
Intel was gathered at one of the so-called "black sites" (that the left is so fond of), so I wonder if Obama will follow through on this.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_159950.html
Once again your so-called speed reading has led you to make a fundamental misrepresentation of tenor and fact. Maybe you should read slower.
The hypothetical is actually pretty uninteresting seeing you cannot realistically be 100% certain of the outcome of any kind of torture.
But regardless of that, no I wouldn't support torture in any way, shape or form, regardless of any perceived 'benefit'. I agree with the means being as important as the end.
Probably not, much like Gitmo or pulling out of Afghanistan, and many more things he hasn't followed through on...
That's the sticking point for me. In the real world, it's never 100% whether info will be produced, or if it is, whether it will be verifiable.
It's as useful as saying, "Would you allow torture to US suspects if you knew they would give up information on where the missing bodies?" The implication is that all those who are tortured are a) guilty and b) definitely know actionable intel.
Keep it illegal, and if people go outside the boundaries of law, let a jury decide if it was the right or wrong decision. (That's my view, anyways.)
lol people trying to analyze this. You will never know the truth.
We all going to act like OBL isn't cryogenically frozen underneath the Pentagon?
Pakistan did its part (by Pakistan's President)...
Washington PostMy government endorses the words of President Obama and appreciates the credit he gave us Sunday night for the successful operation in Khyber Pakhtunkhawa. We also applaud and endorse the words of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that we must “press forward, bolstering our partnerships, strengthening our networks, investing in a positive vision of peace and progress, and relentlessly pursuing the murderers who target innocent people.” We have not yet won this war, but we now clearly can see the beginning of the end, and the kind of South and Central Asia that lies in our future.
Obama's primary challenger maybe Hillary again..I think she is lending great credibility to a possible 2016 run....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)