Reply With Quote
Why are you being so mean? You're a mean mean man, TeyshaBlue. Please leave WC alone!
Whatever. I know I could find information, but I'm not going to bother. Would you even accept it? Seems to me that any clear thinking person should naturally understand you don't give one group of people a different starting point than others. What good is any evidence I can find if you are already of the mindset that blacks are inferior, and need an advantage over others to compete?
Isn't that what a quota system does? End up making selections to satisfy numbers, even when the standard has to be lowered to achieve such numbers?
Why are you being so mean? You're a mean mean man, TeyshaBlue. Please leave WC alone!
Right.
You admitted you are already prejudiced against black people, and your perception of affirmative action inflames that existing prejudice.
Affirmative Action does not make the assumption that blacks, or any other oppressed groups, are inferior. Just FYI.
You going to have fun with this too WH?
Someone's got their head in the grinder again.
lol. This is confirmation bias in spades. I don't need info! I'm right! Pardon me if I reject the notion that you have any idea whatsoever of what a clear thinking person would naturally understand. Rational debate depends upon the use of facts and cites to support a position. Your strawman defense, hiding behind the coward's skirts of innuendo (ie the completely bogus "you are already of the mindset that black are inferior"), teeters on the thin line between the tantrumatic rantings of a spoiled 9 year old girl, or an attempt at debate by my chihuahua.
No.
If you stressed this a little less, maybe people would go a little easier on you.
wOULDN'T COST YOU A THING, O WILD ONE.
I know that. I would say that those saying that a quota system is necessary to get the desired numbers on minorities are saying minorities aren't good enough to compete on a level playing field. Therefor, they are calling the minorities inferior, and are the racist.
The origins of Affirmative Action was a great idea:
Executive Order 10925
inferior? it doesn't treat them as inferior. they come from inferior cir stances, thereby lowering thier chances of having success. that's where affirmative actions comes in. affirmative action doesn't imply racial inferiority.
tHERE'S NO HAIRBRUSHI9NG IN TACKLE FOOTBALL. tROOF.
(double post)
With all the preconceived notion of me, I doubt taking that time would pay off. People still wish to insist they know my intent more than I do, so what good would it do?
Affirmative action, yes. Quota's no.
anybody see the goalpost?
You might have expressed it accidentally once or twice.
i think that's what you're trying to make the underlying message when i don't think there's enough evidence for it. they don't state anything about racial inferiority, only underrepresentation. underrepresentation doesn't mean that the group that is underrepresented is inferior.
Don't you ever wonder why everyone seems to tell you the same things? At what point do you stop thinking everyone else is wrong and actually realize the cause of the situation?
You've been here for years spewing off your BS so I don't think you're allowed to use this word to describe how people feel about you.
Well, this thread backfired rather quickly
Yeppers.......he screwed the op, couldn't adjust. It all went sideways.Well, this thread backfired rather quickly
Yes, you perceive them that way. Not everyone does.
Why would that enter his mind, if both people show equal amts of ap ude? Does it matter how one got there if they can both do the job equally well?
Surely, there's only a select few racists out there. We're probably down to the double digits by now.
Again, your perceptions are not universal. I don't know why you think they are.
So you think the playing field is level BEFORE affirmative action?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
