Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34
  1. #1
    The Basketball Guy EricD's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Post Count
    347
    Jefferson Hill and McDyess for Stephen Jackson and Tyrus Thomas

    What do you think ST black and bold?

  2. #2
    Veteran Proxy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    4,095
    Jefferson Hill and McDyess for Stephen Jackson and Tyrus Thomas

    What do you think ST black and bold?
    I'd rather switch Hill with Blair, but I would be pretty happy if this went down... it would add toughness for sure. Tyrus is a dumbass though.

  3. #3
    Believe. 5in10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    628
    Cho, their new gm recently said that he's gonna try and build them in the same mold as okc, meaning he wants to aquire draft picks and talented young assets. Whos contract is longer Jefferson or Jackson? If they're gonna trade one of their young guys they'd probably want at least Hill and Blair, but I think they would make an easy trade partner because theyre probably gonna wanna tank next season for a chance at that #1 pick. Maybe they would take Jefferson because he does=tank.

  4. #4
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479
    Cho, their new gm recently said that he's gonna try and build them in the same mold as okc, meaning he wants to aquire draft picks and talented young assets. Whos contract is longer Jefferson or Jackson? If they're gonna trade one of their young guys they'd probably want at least Hill and Blair, but I think they would make an easy trade partner because theyre probably gonna wanna tank next season for a chance at that #1 pick. Maybe they would take Jefferson because he does=tank.
    Not sure but Jefferson will definitely get you the better draft pick.

  5. #5
    Believe. 5in10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    628
    Not sure but Jefferson will definitely get you the better draft pick.

  6. #6
    I Make Love To Pressure MR.SILVER&BLack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    1,118
    jeffersons only 30 and jacksons 33. RJ's contract is only 1 year longer than jacksons. they would get young talent and im pretty sure they would be willing to unload thomas because they want to draft one of the PF from UT. actually they want to unload some of there PF's so this is realistic. guaranteed trade if jordan gets involved.

  7. #7
    The Dude Buddy Holly's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    7,358
    Jefferson, Hill, Blair, Dice, 29th pick, future draft picks for Jackson, Thomas and the 19th pick?

  8. #8
    Veteran spurs1990's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    4,165
    Jefferson, Hill, Blair, Dice, 29th pick, future draft picks for Jackson, Thomas and the 19th pick?
    Great trade. Alack, the FO is probably too conservative or gun-shy to explore deals like these, for sooth.

  9. #9
    Veteran Russo21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    2,945
    I'd do that for sure. We've missed Jackson in san antonio. Both have very reasonable contracts for what they bring to the table. Like proxy said id rather switch hill with blair but yep i'd love it if that went down either way.

    Duncan
    Thomas
    Jackson
    Ginobili
    Parker

    Length, athleticism, offence and defense. That's a nice starting lineup.

  10. #10
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    144
    jordan is dumb but not that dumb. trading 2 of his top 3 players for our role players? a much more likely scenario is:
    Parker-Jefferson for Jackson-Augustine

  11. #11
    Veteran Russo21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    2,945
    Spurs wouldn't do that then. If the bobcats wanted Parker to get the deal done it would have to be Parker and RJ for Thomas Jackson and Augustin, he's a decent PG and we'd need that after getting rid of tony.
    Last edited by Russo21; 06-17-2011 at 12:50 AM.

  12. #12
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    Jefferson, Hill, Blair, Dice, 29th pick, future draft picks for Jackson, Thomas and the 19th pick?
    I would love that trade except the future draft picks...I would be willing throw in Neal though...draft Singleton if he's there

    Duncan/FA
    Thomas/Bonner/FA
    Jackson/Butler/SIngleton
    Manu/Anderson
    Parker/FA

    PG options: Earl Watson, Tracy Mcgrady?, Dragic(if there is a MLE option),Arroyo
    C options:Przybilla,Foster,Haddadi,Yao(if there is a MLE option),Nazr
    PF option:Kwame Brown?, Glen Davis(if there is a MLE option),McRoberts,Humphries(if there is a MLE option),Shawne Williams, Carl Landry(if there is a MLE option)

    I would of put Chandler up there but I think he will stay with the mavs, and the same for Nene,Oden also but would be nice if he came here, and was healthy so the Spurs can build around him for the future if he stays healthy somehow .

  13. #13
    I am not redwood DJ Mbenga's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    4,579
    jordan is cheap but this would go to another level

  14. #14
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    jordan is dumb but not that dumb. trading 2 of his top 3 players for our role players? a much more likely scenario is:
    Parker-Jefferson for Jackson-Augustine
    They're not in build mode, they're in destroy mode, and they're not going to want to rebuild around a 29 YO PG when they're done destroying. Just look at what they did last year. They traded their best player and All Star for a bag of chips from POR. IF they're truly following the OKC plan, they don't even want an AS PG to mess up their required 2-3 years of losing bad to get into the top 5 of the draft.

  15. #15
    Believe. 5in10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    628
    They're not in build mode, they're in destroy mode, and they're not going to want to rebuild around a 29 YO PG when they're done destroying. Just look at what they did last year. They traded their best player and All Star for a bag of chips from POR. IF they're truly following the OKC plan, they don't even want an AS PG to mess up their required 2-3 years of losing bad to get into the top 5 of the draft.
    This. This is why the trade isn't too far fetched.

  16. #16
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    I just love these "trade a non contender to get a non contender" suggestions.

    None of the Bobcats, or all of them in fact, would make us a contender for the ring. We need a legit center and a solid backup PG.

  17. #17
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    1,639
    duncan
    dalembert
    prince
    parker
    manu

    and try and get Sjax back.

  18. #18
    near awake, semi-coherent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,386
    I just love these "trade a non contender to get a non contender" suggestions.

    None of the Bobcats, or all of them in fact, would make us a contender for the ring. We need a legit center and solid backup PG.
    Disagree on the pg..... a back-up point guard is less needed than having a decent option with some size at small forward. Honestly a Hill-Ginobli platoon running point can be successful for 15 minutes or so per game which is all Parker should actually need. Jefferson is a declining player who is/was dependent on his athleticism for getting most of his points on fastbreaks or drives, and is something of a streak shooter. His defense was at best only moderately above average when he was interested playing with the Nets with Kid and has declined since. When interested he does a decent enough job nothing spectacular but when plays aren't being run for him 1 trip in 3 down the floor his concentration disappears and he can never seem to really get back into the flow of the game.

  19. #19
    near awake, semi-coherent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,386
    I'm no longer a big fan of getting Jackson back. Two years ago when he was on the market I really liked the idea, but there is a big difference in NBA career terms for 33 and 31. He's now an older player used to being the focal point of a team. Also after all this time and this many teams how much ins utional knowledge is likely to be left, which was one of the stronger arguments for him in the first place?

  20. #20
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    I'm no longer a big fan of getting Jackson back. Two years ago when he was on the market I really liked the idea, but there is a big difference in NBA career terms for 33 and 31. He's now an older player used to being the focal point of a team. Also after all this time and this many teams how much ins utional knowledge is likely to be left, which was one of the stronger arguments for him in the first place?
    Jack is one of those players who's age really doesn't matter. He's never been overly quick or athletic. What he has been is a cold blooded playoff shooting assassin. If you plug him in at SF, even his ball handling shortcomings mostly disappear. He's also like Neal, in that he doesn't need to shoot from the corner to be effective. The Grizz were giving us all we could eat on the high angle 3 pointers, they just shut down the corners.

  21. #21
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,971
    A couple deals are rumored with Char.

    TP for Thomas and Augusine and the 9th pick is the best value.

    TP and Dice and 29th for Jax and Thomas and 19th pick is also rumored.

    I like both deals.

    TP has also been tied to Atl for Josh Smith. I like the deal if we can find a good SG in FA.
    Link?

  22. #22
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    A couple deals are rumored with Char.

    TP for Thomas and Augusine and the 9th pick is the best value.

    TP and Dice and 29th for Jax and Thomas and 19th pick is also rumored.

    I like both deals.

    TP has also been tied to Atl for Josh Smith. I like the deal if we can find a good SG in FA.
    where is this rumoured?

  23. #23
    Lol Crews jjktkk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    6,420
    Its internal, like in his head.

  24. #24
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    They're not in build mode, they're in destroy mode, and they're not going to want to rebuild around a 29 YO PG when they're done destroying. Just look at what they did last year. They traded their best player and All Star for a bag of chips from POR. IF they're truly following the OKC plan, they don't even want an AS PG to mess up their required 2-3 years of losing bad to get into the top 5 of the draft.
    I would agree with this statement. That has to be Jordan's gameplan right now. Make a load of $$$ as much as possible in the next 3-4 years before the fans figure out the teams' goal is actually to lose and then cash in a bunch of picks and start the rebuilding process. Whether or not he'll actually start spending $$$ at that point is debatable however.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    3,313
    With the Bobcats looking for help at the guard position and they seem to like George Hill I would try for a Hill and Jefferson for SJax and a 1st round pick. SJax would be an excellent addition to the 3 plus with the Bobcats you may end up with a lottery pick at some point. In addition RJ would fit into their offense much better than ours. Augustin is more of a distributor than Tony.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •