Page 5 of 50 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 1242
  1. #101
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    According to Jim Buss, new acting decision-maker and the owner's son, Bynum WILL NOT be traded under any cir stances. After all, it was he who found Bynum in the first place and it is he who made Bynum is pet project. Buss is on record for declaring, on every occasion when this speculation starts, that the Fakers ARE NOT INTERESTED IN TRADING BYNUM.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182023

  2. #102
    I'm Spurtacus Spurtacus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,668
    This trade currently fails but it looks like the Raptors have a few expiring contracts. If it can work I wouldn't be opposed to it.

    Spurs get:
    Jose Calderon
    Ed Davis
    Linas Kleiza
    #5 pick

    Raptors get:
    Tony Parker
    DeJuan Blair
    Richard Jefferson
    #29 pick & #59 pick

  3. #103
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    No way Toronto does that deal.

  4. #104
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Tony/RJ for Bargnani/DeRozan/Calderon+pick

    Although I don't think Toronto would let go of DeRozan that easy.
    I don't want anything to do with Bargnani. Ed Davis would be far preferable.

  5. #105
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    I'd pull this:

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3skv2lo

    Leaves us with:

    Calderon/Hill
    Manu/Anderson
    #5 Pick/Kleza
    Duncan/Blair
    Andrea/Splitter
    Why would Toronto do that?

    Parker/Calderon is a lateral move for them.

  6. #106
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    I think there is no truth in parker
    maybe hill
    kings are wanting other teams to give them more for the picks that is why they threw out parkers name

  7. #107
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    if Adrian Wojnarowski says it then the talks are going on. rather it happens or not who knows but you can take it to the bank its legit
    ludden I would believe it

  8. #108
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135

  9. #109
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    Parker/Calderon is a lateral move for them.
    Say what?!

  10. #110
    I make love to pressure shyne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    1,961
    I'll take that got Demarcus Cousins, maybe Pop can whip his fat ass into shape.

  11. #111
    I'm Spurtacus Spurtacus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,668
    , this draft does suck. Looking at Chad Ford's top 10 in his latest mock there isn't anyone I would want as a Spurs besides Brandon Knight or Derrick Williams.

  12. #112
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473

  13. #113
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    tbh, what's really gonna suck is when the Spurs don't do on Thursday and everybody in here will be

  14. #114
    #21 timtonymanu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    34,838
    tbh, what's really gonna suck is when the Spurs don't do on Thursday and everybody in here will be

  15. #115
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479
    Why would Toronto do that?

    Parker/Calderon is a lateral move for them.

  16. #116
    Thanks Tim Vic Petro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,491
    Although there are a lot of unknowns with the new CBA, it seems a good chance an amnesty clause will be included. Even if RJ isn't included in a trade, there could be an out down the road.

    Obviously no one can have an opinion until a trade is agreed upon and we see official compensation. However in a vacuum, I think the idea of trading a speed-dependent PG entering his 11th NBA season is at least a wise consideration.

    That said TP for #5 or #7 straight up would be disgusting.

  17. #117
    I'm Spurtacus Spurtacus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,668
    tbh, what's really gonna suck is when the Spurs don't do on Thursday and everybody in here will be
    Most likely scenario. I'm already expecting we'll draft a Euro to stash him and dump our second round pick. Boring.

  18. #118
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    683
    Not sure if the Spurs pull the trigger, but if they get the 5th pick from Sacramento, I have no doubts that it's Vesely who they will select.

    The kid is 6'11 and is not your typical Euro. He's got an aggressive offensive game, and he played with Partizan, which is a really good club out in Belgrade.

  19. #119
    Kooler than Jesus Nathan Explosion's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    2,994
    You don't trade Tony Parker just to dump Richard Jefferson. That is beyond moronic.
    Wow, I'm not even involved in the conversation, but I can see that you're either being sarcastic or just not getting it.

    I'll take a stab at the latter.

    You don't trade Parker just to get rid of Jefferson. No way. But, if you're trading Parker, you better make damn sure Jefferson goes with him. At least, that's what the guy with the idea is saying.

    Repeat, don't just trade Parker. If a team wants Tony, then they have to take RJ too or no deal.

    And I don't see ANYONE in this draft that I'd want to trade Parker for. Not one. Parker may not be a franchise guy, but he's a former Finals MVP with 3 rings who knows how the win in the playoffs. There's not one single player in this draft that is going to be as good as Parker. Not one. It's THAT bad.

    Again, I'm not even sure I'd want Hill traded for just a pick, even a lottery pick at that. As someone else stated, this trade is about getting better now as well as long term, and there's not a difference maker that can be had for Parker or Hill. Hill's trade would need a solid role player that's going to prove to be better than Hill in a few years, and there really aren't that many options available in the late lottery picks that can provide that.

  20. #120
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    manu should get you a top 15 pick

    if you trade tp you trade manu and duncan

  21. #121
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    manu should get you a top 15 pick

    if you trade tp you trade manu and duncan

  22. #122
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    You don't trade Tony Parker just to dump Richard Jefferson. That is beyond moronic.
    Wow, I'm not even involved in the conversation, but I can see that you're either being sarcastic or just not getting it.

    I'll take a stab at the latter.You don't trade Parker just to get rid of Jefferson. No way. But, if you're trading Parker, you better make damn sure Jefferson goes with him. At least, that's what the guy with the idea is saying.

  23. #123
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    And I don't see ANYONE in this draft that I'd want to trade Parker for. Not one. Parker may not be a franchise guy, but he's a former Finals MVP with 3 rings who knows how the win in the playoffs. There's not one single player in this draft that is going to be as good as Parker. Not one. It's THAT bad.
    I would agree with that. I wouldn't want anyone after the top two instead of Parker, and maybe not even the top two players in this draft.

    I would only assume that if a Parker trade happened, it wouldn't be solely because of whoever they were targeting. I would assume there was behind-the-scenes grudge carrying going on and getting a pick for Parker would be an easy out. Maybe Parker's talking to the press got on the Spurs bad side hard enough to get them to look to move him? After all, this is the same franchise that pooped on Bowen, pooh-poohing his defense and benching him for an end-of-the-line scorer starving for points and gave some 10-day scrub his jersey number.

  24. #124
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    manu should get you a top 15 pick

    if you trade tp you trade manu and duncan
    Quack quack.

  25. #125
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    Wow, I'm not even involved in the conversation, but I can see that you're either being sarcastic or just not getting it.

    I'll take a stab at the latter.

    You don't trade Parker just to get rid of Jefferson. No way. But, if you're trading Parker, you better make damn sure Jefferson goes with him. At least, that's what the guy with the idea is saying.
    That is exactly what I said. The priority in any trade involving TP is getting back equal value for TP. Getting the trading team to take RJ is secondary.

    You should go back and read what was said before because you are the one who is "not getting it". Don't use my quote to springboard your point when you have no ing clue what I am talking about. Especially when the point you are trying to make has already been discussed . . . thoroughly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •